The ugly secret is that it was the clinton administration that had to have McVeigh and Nichols as the only perpetrators. Otherwise, those people might have had to act in the interests of the US.
I always thought this similarity was fairly compelling.
I saw a special on the History channel about this. They said 3 guys did it, and were captured and spending time in jail in another country. They said it was a Mexican hit crew. An American regime change, if you will.
American leaders were afraid of getting into a war with Mexico, so they let the Oswald story take the headlines.
Like the ME connection to the OKC bombing. Clinton found it easier to blame just 2 men, and let the real story slide. Otherwise, Clinton would have to be presidential - something Democrat politicians fear.
Yahoo TWA800 forum - April 12, 2002
From: John Fiorentino
Subject: Re: [twa800] Kabofovic revisited
[excerpt][quote][emphasis added]
Most here are convinced a "missile" did the dirty deed. I'm not, not yet at least. The initial assessment was "bomb". I thought so to. I still do.
[end quote]
According to this, TEN metallurgists (four from the NTSB, three from Boeing, two from the FBI Laboratory, and one scientist consultant) found no evidence of a bomb (or missile) in the wreckage of TWA 800. Since you apparently disagree, do you believe they were incompetent or part of a coverup conspiracy?
I also believe Flight 800 was knocked down by a missle.
And I believe that JFK was murdered by 3 or more people and that Oswald was nothing more than a patsy. Watching the Zapruder film I find it impossible to believe that those last gruesome frames were the result of a shot from above or behind.
But I have an open mind on the subject, and if you have a book that makes a convincing case I'd probably read it.
Good luck with it.
as for hawking your 'book', i suppose if jim let's it slide that's his call,
but it's hard to see the difference 'tween that and one of us self-employed types posting our wares here ...
$0.02