Skip to comments.
THE OKLAHOMA CITY -- 911 CONNECTION
http://twa800.com/news/mastalk-10-10-02.htm ^
| 10/13/02
| Michael Smerconish
Posted on 10/13/2002 4:03:40 PM PDT by JohnFiorentino
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-74 next last
To: JohnFiorentino
I think Oswald killed Kennedy, and that he acted alone.
LOL!
2
posted on
10/13/2002 4:04:55 PM PDT
by
cmsgop
To: JohnFiorentino
Thanks for posting this. This is info that needs to get out there in the public.
3
posted on
10/13/2002 4:06:41 PM PDT
by
ladyinred
To: cmsgop
I think Oswald killed Kennedy, and that he acted alone. Me to...Arlyn Spector showed me the bullet..on Tee Vee Good article nonetheless
4
posted on
10/13/2002 4:08:18 PM PDT
by
joesnuffy
To: JohnFiorentino
5
posted on
10/13/2002 4:15:06 PM PDT
by
TomServo
To: joesnuffy
You may want to read my forthcoming book on the Kennedy assassination entitled; "Return to Reason" scheduled for release in 2003. I am also not much for conspiracies, but I continue to look into Oklahoma City, and TWA Flight 800, among other things.
To: JohnFiorentino
David Schippers has been touting this investigation to anyone that would listen for several years. The part that I have never understood is why the Feds always have tried to swwep the entire thing under the rug.
The ugly secret is that it was the clinton administration that had to have McVeigh and Nichols as the only perpetrators. Otherwise, those people might have had to act in the interests of the US.
7
posted on
10/13/2002 4:15:34 PM PDT
by
stevem
To: JohnFiorentino
BTTT
8
posted on
10/13/2002 4:17:11 PM PDT
by
Gritty
To: stevem
Unfortunately, I find myself in agreement with you. I say unfortunately, for the country.
To: stevem
The ugly secret is that it was the clinton administration that had to have McVeigh and Nichols as the only perpetrators. Otherwise, those people might have had to act in the interests of the US.That would require Clinton to put down the pizza and zip up his pants.
A terrorist hit would require leadership. Not one of Clintons strong points.
To: stevem
The part that I have never understood is why the Feds always have tried to swwep the entire thing under the rug. The Feds take their lead from the guy in charge. Who was running the show back when this happened? 'Nuff said.
Comment #12 Removed by Moderator
To: JohnFiorentino
I always thought this similarity was fairly compelling.
To: JohnFiorentino
14
posted on
10/13/2002 4:20:42 PM PDT
by
backhoe
To: JohnFiorentino
. I think Oswald killed Kennedy, and that he acted alone. I saw a special on the History channel about this. They said 3 guys did it, and were captured and spending time in jail in another country. They said it was a Mexican hit crew. An American regime change, if you will.
American leaders were afraid of getting into a war with Mexico, so they let the Oswald story take the headlines.
Like the ME connection to the OKC bombing. Clinton found it easier to blame just 2 men, and let the real story slide. Otherwise, Clinton would have to be presidential - something Democrat politicians fear.
To: martin_fierro
Yes, so do I.
To: concerned about politics
There was no conspiracy to kill President Kennedy. My book will be out in 2003.
To: JohnFiorentino
There was no conspiracy to kill President Kennedy. My book will be out in 2003.How do you know? The History channel gave names of the killers and everything, and what jail they're in. Cuba was not being that friendly at the time, either.
To: concerned about politics
Well, over 15 years of research. 10 years spent on the book itself. Perhaps you should read it when it comes out. If you still have questions then we can address them.
To: stevem
The part that I have never understood is why the Feds always have tried to sweep the entire thing under the rug. The correct statement would be that this bombing did not fit Clintons agenda, therefore deny. No up side for Clinton and a big down side War with Iraq. Remember Clinton was cutting the military budget and using the funds for other social programs. Clinton did not want to change that direction. Whats a few hundred dead Americans when you have an agenda to complete.
20
posted on
10/13/2002 4:53:25 PM PDT
by
Lockbox
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-74 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson