Skip to comments.
NJ Supreme Court Hearing Live Thread
New Jersey Public TV ^
| 10/02/02
| TonyInOhio
Posted on 10/02/2002 7:04:20 AM PDT by TonyInOhio
New Jersey Public TV is carrying this hearing live. Click on Watch Live Online, and post what you hear, here.
Tony
TOPICS: Breaking News; Politics/Elections; US: New Jersey
KEYWORDS: demonrats; election; fixisin; forrester; fraud; greasetheskids; igotyourparadigm; lautenberg; ratcrimes; steal; stealingelection; toricelli
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 941-960, 961-980, 981-1,000 ... 1,281-1,293 next last
To: Teacher317
Some boring guy who is getting bogged down in details. Hey... everyone opposed from this point forward should just keep reading the lib lady's speech. Over and over. She said it all ... very eloquently. Very harshly.. Very pointedly. Exactly what you and I would want said.
961
posted on
10/02/2002 9:42:07 AM PDT
by
kjam22
To: Wphile
I wish you could pass me a cig....I NEED it today!
962
posted on
10/02/2002 9:42:08 AM PDT
by
Dog
To: LisaFab
For what it is worth ....Rush thinks this will go to USSC I'm listening and hope he's right.
NJ.com reporting Sen. William Frist, chairman of the Senate GOP campaign committee, said Republicans would consider appealing to the U.S. Supreme Court if the New Jersey court rules in favor of Democrats.
To: wingnuts'nbolts
Is failure to recuse in the face of a conflict of interest grounds for impeachment?
To: jayef
We are in some SERIOUS trouble! Republican (little r) government is no longer understood by the citizenry Congratulations, jayef. You have gotten to the Heart of the Matter.
What is happening now in New Jersey is the ultimate triumph of democracy (aka, Mob rule) over republican government. Our understanding of history has been so degraded that our people no longer know the difference.
This is one of the reasons I shudder whenever some dimwit politician waxes poetic about "exporting democratic values" to benighted parts of the globe.
To: Eala
Just called and mentioned that.
966
posted on
10/02/2002 9:42:32 AM PDT
by
Wphile
To: Jimer
If it goes to the USSC, then it was probably intended to go to the USSC.Please explain.
967
posted on
10/02/2002 9:42:34 AM PDT
by
LisaFab
To: Wphile
lol
one of the beauties of self-employment is i get to refuse hiring/doing work for nico-nazis
968
posted on
10/02/2002 9:42:40 AM PDT
by
tomkat
To: TonyInOhio
index
969
posted on
10/02/2002 9:42:41 AM PDT
by
UB355
To: wingnuts'nbolts
Two of these Judges are contributors to Torch's campaign. They should recuse themselves. I believe one of them also contributed to Lautenberg awhile back.
970
posted on
10/02/2002 9:42:55 AM PDT
by
StarFan
To: XJarhead
This lawyer is not answer the question very well.
He should tell them the legislature did think of vacancies within the 51 days and the law intentionally does not provide a way to replace them.
971
posted on
10/02/2002 9:42:57 AM PDT
by
mlo
To: tomkat
I'm trying to figure out who this one Justice's vocie reminds me of...I think it's Mrs. Castanza (George's mother) from Seinfeld...someone call up and ask her to say "Oh my God"
972
posted on
10/02/2002 9:43:00 AM PDT
by
twyn1
To: Dog
LOL! I know you do. I'm thinkin' of ya though.
973
posted on
10/02/2002 9:43:12 AM PDT
by
Wphile
To: ambrose
The Republicans should ask if they can substitute Tom Kean if it appears that Forrester is losing to Lautenberg.The Dems would love it if it helps to destroy election law. Publically, they would denounce it.
974
posted on
10/02/2002 9:43:23 AM PDT
by
Consort
To: agrace
She (libertarian candidate) is very good! Her arguments are concise and correct.
To: tomkat
LOL....Im doing paint fumes instead.
I do have a question...has anyone made the point to the court that if Lautenberg's polls next week show he's 20pts behind, do the RATS get to pick another candidate?
To: TonyInOhio
The justice's argument that the statute only provided a procedure for 51 days and out but left open 51 days and in is moronic. The clear implication of the statute is that less than 51 days prior, you CAN'T name a new candidate.
If the legislator wanted to leave open the possiblity of substituting a candidate less than 51 days before, they would have said that.
Any judge who relies on this reasoning is nothing less than corrupt. This is truly depressing. It really seems that we are not a country of laws. This is purely political. Disgusting.
To: All
This lawyer just addressed what I said yesterday could happen.
To: Jimer; dead Question: Did he formally resigned as a candidate and has his resignation been made official?
Answer: He did not resign. He will finish his current term as Senator. He said he will not be a candidate in the election.
So the way I look at it, if they cannot get his name off the ballot, and with him going out in public saying don't feel sorry for me and crying, he will get the sympothy vote and win the election.(I sure hope not) So even though he said he wasn't a candidate he will say the people want him and accept the election.
25 posted on 10/1/02 8:00 AM Pacific by Spunky
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies | Report Abuse ]
978
posted on
10/02/2002 9:43:32 AM PDT
by
Spunky
To: jayef
We are in some SERIOUS trouble! Republican (little r) government is no longer understood by the citizenry. Even sadder, now it appears that it is not understood by our courts! Been a long time coming: How Tyranny Came To America"
979
posted on
10/02/2002 9:43:38 AM PDT
by
Eala
To: freeperfromnj
Republicans would consider appealing to the U.S. Supreme Court if the New Jersey court rules in favor of Democrats.Does Bill Frist really think they haven't already started writing the arguments? Does anybody here think that?
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 941-960, 961-980, 981-1,000 ... 1,281-1,293 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson