Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

RUSSIA'S RADICAL NEW FIGHTER
Discover Magazine ^ | FR Post 9-30-2002 | By MALCOLM V. LOWE

Posted on 09/30/2002 2:30:23 PM PDT by vannrox


RUSSIA'S RADICAL NEW FIGHTER

Russia’s fabled Sukhoi Design Bureau builds the S-37,
a 21st century fighter to go
head-to- head with our F-22.

By MALCOLM V. LOWE
Photos by Katsuhiko Tokunaga/DACT and courtesy of R-Avix; Illustration by John Batchelor



A bold, new combat aircraft designed by the legendary Sukhoi Design Bureau and now undergoing tests in Russia has taken aim at America's next-generation fighter, the F-22. The Russian challenge comes in the form of the single-seat Sukhoi S-37, the world’s first combat aircraft to successfully exploit forward-swept wing (FSW) technology.

First word of the S-37 leaked to the West in 1997, and took Western defense analysts by surprise. Now, after more than 120 test flights at the secret Zhukovsky Flight Test Center near Moscow, it is clear that there is nothing like this bird flying anywhere in the world today. Its creator, the Sukhoi group, is considered to be Russia's premier combat aircraft producer. Sukhoi currently produces a family of topnotch operational fighters and fighter-bombers all based on the very agile and powerful Su- 27 air superiority fighter. These include such models as the Su-33 aircraft carrier-based air defense fighter and the thrust-vectoring Su-37, a fighter and ground-attack aircraft. The general director of the Sukhoi Design Bureau and the Sukhoi Aviation Military-Industrial Complex, Mikhail Pogosyan, is proud of his company’s success. But looking to the future, he sees the need to build a fifth-generation fighter and to find an eventual replacement for the Su-27. "The S-37 program [has] a critical importance for the development of our company," he tells POPULAR MECHANICS.

Named Berkut, which translates to mean Golden Eagle or Royal Eagle, the S-37 bears an "S" rather than an "Su" designation because it is an experimental rather than production aircraft. Design of the aircraft, originally known as the S-32, began around 1983, and drew on many years of FSW research that had commenced in the former Soviet Union during the 1940s—initially using captured Nazi technology. The Russians were also well aware of the Grumman X-29 FSW research aircraft, as two of these single-seat, single-engine planes were being tested in America between 1984 and the early 1990s (see "The Outer Limits").





The S-37, however, is almost twice the size of the X-29, with a markedly different configuration. It has a length of 74 ft. and a wingspan of 54 ft. 10 in., with a maximum takeoff weight of just under 75,000 pounds. Power comes from two Aviadvigatel (Perm) D-30F6 turbofans, each developing 34,177 pounds of static thrust with afterburners—but without a thrust-vector ring. Together the engines give the S-37 a respectable, if unspectacular, top speed of around Mach 1.6. The aircraft may be re-engined with Sukhoi's preferred option of two Lyulka (Saturn) AL-41F turbofans with thrust vectoring, when these formidable engines—which pour out 39,350 pounds of static thrust with afterburners—become available.

Unconventional Design

The real innovations in the S-37 lie within its unconventional design. The swept-forward wing is part of a so-called "tandem triplane" arrangement, blending all-moving forward canards with the swept-forward wing, a short-span broad-chord swept horizontal tail plus outward-canted vertical tailplanes. To speed up manufacturing, some parts of the S-37 were borrowed from the Su-27 series, including the undercarriage and vertical tails, but the main flying surfaces are all new. The S-37's FSW layout meets Sukhoi's desire to create a fighter with super-maneuverability—one capable of maintaining stability and control at almost any altitude and angle of attack. Critical to achieving this is the aircraft's computerized fly-by-wire control system, probably similar to that used in the Su-35 and Su-37, which allows for the basically unstable aerodynamics of the aircraft to be under control at all times. Vital in dogfights, this system, coupled with the FSW layout, helps the S-37 reach the optimum attitude for launching missiles at short- and medium-range opponents. Pogosyan, formerly the chief designer of the S-37, points out that agility was a top priority. "We were looking for the technical solutions to increase aircraft maneuverability in close combat."

The S-37's forward-swept, slightly tapered wing has leading- edge flaps and trailing-edge flaps and ailerons. Compared to a normal swept-back wing, the FSW potentially has better lift, good antispin and stall resistance, and allows a shorter takeoff run. At transonic speeds (around Mach 0.8 to Mach 1.3), it has a better lift-to-drag ratio than a conventional wing. During flight, airflow is directed inward across the wing’s section, thus preventing aileron and tip stall at higher angles of attack, and allowing better control response at high angles of attack. That’s great for dogfighting. The key to all this is the use of up to 90 percent composite materials in the wing’s structure. Sukhoi has made a major breakthrough in the use of advanced composites in the S-37's wing, and these have proven able to cope with the considerable bending and structural loading on this type of wing during close-in maneuvering across a wide speed range.



The FSW concept is very different from plans we’ve seen for the stealthy F-22 Raptor, its potential American rival (see "21st Century Fighter," Dec. 1999). Although the S-37 does have some stealth design features, and may be covered with radar-absorbent coatings, low detectability is secondary to the maneuverability created by the FSW.

Secret Flight Tests

The S-37 first flew in September 1997 at the Russian experimental base at Zhukovsky near Moscow. Test flights have been successful so far, with Sukhoi claiming that the S- 37 has made more than 120 flights. But many questions remain.

Will it remain simply as a proof-of-concept aircraft, with no actual production S-37 ever made? Will its radical technology be used in forthcoming Russian fighter designs, perhaps to meet the Russian air force’s future heavy fighter requirements? Or will it form the basis of the already-rumored S-54 light fighter, a possible Russian rival to America's Joint Strike Fighter? It can certainly be said that a production model of the S-37 would be a match for any Western fighter.

The S-37's big rival in Russia is the MiG 1.44. This experimental twin-engined fighter first flew, after many lengthy delays, in February 2000. Most Western observers believe that the MiG design, and not the S-37, will ultimately lead to a production fighter. However, Sukhoi has a possible trump card. The new Russian president, Vladimir Putin, is particularly friendly toward Sukhoi, and his planned reforms of Russia's aircraft industry could benefit Sukhoi. Pogosyan tells PM he is upbeat: "We have a good design and scientific organization, which enables us to successfully compete with the West."

Much of the S-37 program remains veiled in secrecy, but its potentially world-beating design truly extends the boundaries of state-of-the-art fighter technology.



TOPICS: Business/Economy; Crime/Corruption; Culture/Society; Extended News; Foreign Affairs; Government; News/Current Events; Russia
KEYWORDS: air; airforce; bureau; design; fast; military; missile; new; pilot; plane; s37; sukhoi; technology
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-57 next last
Interesting.
1 posted on 09/30/2002 2:30:24 PM PDT by vannrox
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: vannrox
Great. It can pull 10+Gs and do the funky chicken.

Missiles are getting to the point where they can pull 100+Gs, and the Air Force version of Lockheed-Martin's F-35 will eventually mount a 100-kilowatt laser with a 10KM range, and it will be stealthy to boot.

The only way to describe this is to compare it to the various cavalry arms of the European armies in July, 1914. Splendid troops, well-trained, well-equipped...and completely frickin' irrelevant in the era of the Maxim Gun.

2 posted on 09/30/2002 2:34:08 PM PDT by Poohbah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: vannrox; Poohbah
"The only way to describe this is to compare it to the various cavalry arms of the European armies in July, 1914. Splendid troops, well-trained, well-equipped...and completely frickin' irrelevant in the era of the Maxim Gun."

Bwahaahahaha!!

The revolving missle magazine is pretty neat though.

Just for kicks, should I ping stavka2?

3 posted on 09/30/2002 2:40:11 PM PDT by Vigilantcitizen
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Poohbah
For the first of its kind, it sure looks a lot like a rip off of this...

Two X-29 aircraft, featuring one of the most unusual designs in aviation history, were flown at the NASA Ames-Dryden Flight Research Facility (soon to be renamed the Dryden Flight Research Center), Edwards, Calif., as technology demonstrators to investigate advanced concepts and technologies. The multi-phased program was conducted from 1984 to 1992 and provided an engineering data base that is available in the design and development of future aircraft.

4 posted on 09/30/2002 2:41:28 PM PDT by Magnum44
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: vannrox
S-37 at FAS:

http://www.fas.org/man/dod-101/sys/ac/row/s-37.htm
5 posted on 09/30/2002 2:43:04 PM PDT by knighthawk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: vannrox
Garbage. This reporter obviously got some major kickback for this article. There is nothing radical about it. As stated in the article NASA tested a similar design almost twenty years ago. Gee, big surprise, the Ruskies stole the design and made it bigger. We all know bigger is better. The F-22 would kick major butt on this puppy. No stealth, Non-steering jets, No heat signature reduction equal major sitting duck.
6 posted on 09/30/2002 2:46:03 PM PDT by PushinTin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: vannrox
USA has messed around with this forward-swept-wing design, based on the F-5/T-38 airframe. I think the Germans also messed with it during the WW II era. If I remember right, it had triple-redundant computer systems to keep it stable, because it is literally "flying backwards", which makes it extremely maneuverable, due to its inherent instability. The problem is, if the computers were to fail, it's instant death for the pilot. Try throwing a dart backwards some time, then imagine a plane acting like that at 500 knots or better.
7 posted on 09/30/2002 2:48:02 PM PDT by FlyVet
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: vannrox
Too bad they only have enough money to build two of them. It'll be great for airshows.
8 posted on 09/30/2002 2:48:49 PM PDT by paddles
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: vannrox
This worries me. America must have a military that can destroy all enemies. Otherwise the world that hates us because we will free will be tempted to strike and might even win.
9 posted on 09/30/2002 2:53:28 PM PDT by adam stevens
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: vannrox
this is from a Popular Mechanics article from over a year ago ... is somebody else copying it and publishing it?
10 posted on 09/30/2002 2:53:57 PM PDT by Bobby777
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Poohbah
Right on.

I currently reading Tom Clancy's Red Rabbit. The over hyped and poor quality control of the Russians under the communists is the same today as back two decades ago. Clancy nailed the old Soviet PR bozos throughout this book. They couldn't even make enough panty hose with good quality to satisfy the Russian women let alone make planes to compete against ours.

This is just another old rip off of our out of date technology.

As someone posted, they will have enough money to build a couple and show them at air shows around the world. Those who still have nightmares of the Russians will have another reason to continue those nightmares.
11 posted on 09/30/2002 2:56:23 PM PDT by Grampa Dave
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Poohbah
There has to be a reason why the X-29 was abandoned.
12 posted on 09/30/2002 3:03:46 PM PDT by steveegg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: steveegg
The performance tradeoffs didn't give enough positive results for the price tag.
13 posted on 09/30/2002 3:06:00 PM PDT by Poohbah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: adam stevens
This worries me. America must have a military that can destroy all enemies.

Technology is great, but it will never replace training. To defeat all enemies, we need to worry less about the most advanced technologies and more about the most advanced training. People fight, not machines.

14 posted on 09/30/2002 3:08:49 PM PDT by templar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Poohbah
Sounded familiar. At least the vectored-thrust motor won't be in it (yet).
15 posted on 09/30/2002 3:11:28 PM PDT by steveegg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Magnum44
For the first of its kind, it sure looks like a rip off of this....

And of these earlier thoughts from the German firm of Blohm and Voss.

16 posted on 09/30/2002 3:13:40 PM PDT by archy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: steveegg
There has to be a reason why the X-29 was abandoned.

Built by Rockwell International I believe and now many years and many new developments later it is obsolete!
17 posted on 09/30/2002 3:15:11 PM PDT by e_castillo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: steveegg
There has to be a reason why the X-22 was abandoned.

And why the ordered fleet of Army Comanche helicopters has been cut in half....
And why the tanks are being replaced with wheeled armoured cars....
And why the Crusader Artillery Support System was cancelled....

But everyone gets new blu- I mean black berets....

18 posted on 09/30/2002 3:18:12 PM PDT by archy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Poohbah
Just so. Surely it will be replaced in service as soon as the Ekip developmental prototypes are type-classified into functional YAK and MiG designs...or maybe MiL or Ka models....


19 posted on 09/30/2002 3:32:35 PM PDT by archy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: FlyVet
Didn't our experiments with this design have problems with the wings wanting to twist off of the airframe under high-speed manuevering? Thought I read that was another reason we stopped pursuing it. It would then make sense that the Russians, to make it work would have to build such a beefy airframe to handle heavy-duty wing roots. The cutaway diagram seems to suggest this. Any thoughts?
20 posted on 09/30/2002 3:45:31 PM PDT by PsyOp
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-57 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson