Posted on 09/19/2002 1:38:31 AM PDT by Dallas
AMERICA will NUKE Baghdad if Saddam Hussein dares unleash weapons of mass destruction, it emerged last night.
The chilling warning to Iraq was revealed by former Tory Premier John Major, who led Britain in the 1991 Gulf War.
During that conflict, allied forces were armed with battlefield nuclear weapons and prepared to use them in a counter attack, he said.
Saddam was privately warned his capital would be obliterated if he used weapons of mass destruction against allied troops or Middle East targets including Israel.
And senior security sources last night confirmed Saddam has been warned AGAIN of the consequences if he breaks the ban on using terror weapons.
Mr Major wrote of the Gulf War: In private, Saddam Hussein received an unmistakable warning about the immediate and catastrophic consequences for Iraq of any such attack on civilians.
I knew that if he did use these diabolical weapons we would have to escalate our response to bring the war to a speedy and conclusive end before too many of our troops were exposed to them.
Mr Major yesterday supported renewed action but raised questions about the way a cornered Saddam might lash out.
He said: On this occasion we will specifically be going to war in order to replace the Iraqi regime. Saddam will be gone.
He will be dead, he will be in prison, or he will be in exile. Would he try to create maximum chaos? Would he seek to use weapons of mass destruction?
Would he use them on oil fields in the Middle East to create economic chaos? Would he pass them to terrorist groups, would he perhaps the worst nightmare of all try to use them on an adjacent capital?
We can largely protect against that, do not press me on how, we can protect against that.
Saddam targeted Jerusalem with 39 Scud missiles in 1991 killing two and injuring hundreds in an attempt to drag Israel into the fighting.
He had chemical and biological warheads too but chose not to use them in the face of Americas warning.
Yesterday Israeli forces moved Patriot missile launchers which take out incoming rockets into position in case Saddam targets them again.
Pressure was building on Iraq as a British ex-UN official warned that sending in weapons inspectors is a no-win move because Saddam would hide his arsenal.
Tim Trevan, an expert on biological weapons, said: I dont think sending in weapons inspectors is a good idea, but it may be a necessary thing to do because of the political situation.
We know he had anthrax and botulinum toxin and we know he had nerve gases.
We never found all his equipment and hes had four years to build new production facilities underground. The job of finding them would be nigh on impossible.
Maybe neutrons can find them.
(steely)
Protege of Maggie Thatcher. If I got to share a fox hole, give me a Brit or an Israeli.
Otherwise, I prefer my own company.
Saddam you have BEEN warned
Wonder what that means?
You've obviously never met an Australian or a Kiwi.
By whom?
The chilling warning to Iraq was revealed by former Tory Premier John Major, who led Britain in the 1991 Gulf War.
This Brit butthole needs to shut his trap. Since when does the US need some whiny, unemployed Brit politician to go deliver warnings for our government?
Saddam, himself, personally, cannot launch a WMD missile if he is cornered. He would have to order someone else to do it.
If the person so ordered is more rational than Saddam and has a good idea that this order is in desperation (Saddam is near death), "some failure" will probably happen to prevent the launch.
He was gone...."
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.