Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Seeking info on FDR
Vanity, Research assistance request

Posted on 09/06/2002 10:12:51 AM PDT by Andrew Lanz

Hello FR folk,
My daughter (12th Grade) is writing a paper on why FDR was among the worst political influences on our Constitutional Republic. ( Papa gushes with pride )

She's found plenty of info on the New Deal, Social Security, and the Minimum wage, but most of these references speak glowingly of the policies and the man. She's got some good information on why his policies were harmful and an absurd distortion of the enumerated federal powers. She needs info on FDR's political scheming and quotes demonstrating his obvious disregard for individual liberty.

Pointers to any URLs, publications, or other resources will be cheerfully accepted! Feel free to email me to save FR bandwidth, or post in this thread. I'll post her paper here if anyone is interested.

Thank you all!
- Drew



TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Miscellaneous; Philosophy; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: fdr; minimumwage; newdeal; packingcourt; roosevelt; socialsecurity
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-31 next last

1 posted on 09/06/2002 10:12:51 AM PDT by Andrew Lanz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Andrew Lanz
You're looking for facts to support your conclusions?
2 posted on 09/06/2002 10:17:14 AM PDT by cruiserman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Andrew Lanz
I would recommend James Bovard's Lost Rights as a good counterweight to the pro-FDR side.
3 posted on 09/06/2002 10:18:02 AM PDT by Poohbah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Andrew Lanz
#1 He failed to end the depression. He never understood the cause of depression and never took action to correct it.

#2 He failed to recognize the growth of fascism and Japanese militarism as a threat to the US.

#3 He did not prepare the country for war until after we were attacked, despite the ample warning we had from 1933 on. The US military was in dismal shape, the guys were training with sticks for rifles and had no ammo.

#4 He never acknowledged the slaughter of Jews taking place in Europe, although he knew about it. He sent Jewish refugees back to the Nazis who then executed them.

#5 He did not recognize the threat that Stalin posed, and consigned half of Europe to Soviet control.

He was charismatic, and people loved him, and he was an utter disaster.
4 posted on 09/06/2002 10:23:13 AM PDT by marron
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Andrew Lanz
Give them this FDR quote:

"The lessons of history confirmed by the evidence immediately before me, show conclusively that continued dependence upon relief induces a spiritual and moral disintegration fundamentally destructive to the national fiber. To dole out relief in this way is to administer a narcotic, a subtle destroyer of the human spirit. It is inimical to the dictates of sound policy. It is in violation of the traditions of America. Work must be found for able-bodied but destitute workers. The federal government must and shall quit this business of relief."

5 posted on 09/06/2002 10:28:11 AM PDT by dfwgator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dfwgator
Obviously what he said, and what he did were two completely different things.
6 posted on 09/06/2002 10:30:09 AM PDT by dfwgator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Andrew Lanz
A working title: "FDR, Father of American Socialism"
7 posted on 09/06/2002 10:30:37 AM PDT by AdA$tra
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Andrew Lanz
Find a copy of the book "The Roosevelt Myth" by John T. Flynn, it was written in 1948.
8 posted on 09/06/2002 10:33:21 AM PDT by dakine
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Andrew Lanz
He tried to stack the Supreme Court because some of his acts were ruled unconstitutional. There is also a union decision during the FDR years that was way out of line, but I can't recall what it was.
9 posted on 09/06/2002 10:33:47 AM PDT by KC_Conspirator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Andrew Lanz
If I answer does that mean I get to ship my daughters homework to you?
10 posted on 09/06/2002 10:34:54 AM PDT by Non-Sequitur
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dfwgator
I Use Paul Johnson's "History of the American People" as the main text for my U.S. II survey class. Johnson's treatment of Roosevelt is quite good. Also good is Johnson's section on Roosevelt in "Modern Times." The nice thing about Johnson (in addition to the fact that he writes well) is that he footnotes everything and has great bibliography. Your daughter should find him a great lead to other sources.

Johnson's books, by the way, should be on every conservative's "must read" list.

11 posted on 09/06/2002 10:36:19 AM PDT by ancientart
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Andrew Lanz
Try this URL:

http://www.sierratimes.com/archive/files/jul/24/nyquist.htm

12 posted on 09/06/2002 10:43:12 AM PDT by Doug Loss
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Andrew Lanz


The Challenge to Liberty

Also check out what Alfred Smith (who FDR spoke of glowing in the 20s!) had to say about the "New Deal". Neither Smith or Hoover were hard core conservatives, in fact they ran against each in 1928 with Hoover running on a center-right message and Smith running as the center-left candidate.

When BOTH major candidates from the 1928 Presidential election say the 1932 winner is a kooky socialist, you better believe it!

13 posted on 09/06/2002 10:52:15 AM PDT by BillyBoy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Andrew Lanz
He also forecast the rhetorical mode by which "community" could loom over individual liberty. "If we call the method regulation, people hold up their hands in horror and say ‘un-American,’ or ‘dangerous,’" Roosevelt pointed out. "But if we call the same identical process co-operation, these same old fogeys will cry out ‘well done’.... cooperation is as good a word for the new theory as any other."

For those who claim that FDR's New Deal socialist policies were driven by economic necessity, note that this is from a speech he made in 1912.

More here.

14 posted on 09/06/2002 11:02:21 AM PDT by tacticalogic
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Andrew Lanz
I agree with the previous poster - John T Flynn's "The Roosevelt Myth" is awesome and excellently documented. He incurred the wrath of FDR more than once! It may be hard to find. Try the all the libraries and online search engines. Its worth it!
15 posted on 09/06/2002 11:20:51 AM PDT by DrLiberty
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ancientart
[Paul] Johnson's books, by the way, should be on every conservative's "must read" list.

Seconded.

16 posted on 09/06/2002 11:25:12 AM PDT by dighton
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Andrew Lanz
Here's a site you might find helpful. http://www.barefootsworld.net/srwep.html
17 posted on 09/06/2002 11:32:15 AM PDT by Chewy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Andrew Lanz
The "Roosevelt Myth" book is online: http://www.hazlitt.org/e-texts/fdrmyth/hbzfrm.htm
18 posted on 09/06/2002 11:32:25 AM PDT by sampai
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Andrew Lanz
www.rooseveltmyth.com has much of what she'll need, including books by John T. Flynn, Garet Garrett and others, and links to other sites.

FDR was quite a liar and manipulator, but when you look at what was going on in other countries at the same time, things could have been far worse. FDR's policies were expedients designed to end the depression. In fact they didn't work. Nor did Hoover's policies, some of which paved the way for the New Deal. The great objection I have to him, though, isn't so much what he did domestically, but that he didn't treat his policies as temporary necessities, but strove to institutionalize them and make his rule and that of bureaucratic government permanent.

In foreign policy, his embracing Stalin was horrible. Roosevelt liked Stalin too much and conceded too much to him. But would any President have held Stalin wholly at arm's length once the war had begun? Willkie certainly wouldn't have. Beware of taking Churchill and FDR as good and evil, as Churchill was not less anxious to satisfy the tyrant. Churchill was smarter and more undeceived about Stalin, but certainly no model of anti-communism during the war, nor, given the circumstances, could he have been.

19 posted on 09/06/2002 11:33:41 AM PDT by x
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Andrew Lanz
Look up the St. Louis incident, where FDR sent a boat load of poor Jews back to Europe so they could be murdered in Nazi death camps.
20 posted on 09/06/2002 11:43:43 AM PDT by jmaroneps37
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-31 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson