Posted on 08/19/2002 11:15:10 AM PDT by Gargantua
RASH OF KIDNAPPINGS
The Bitter Fruit Of Liberal Society
and the Homosexual Agenda
When we take God out of our classrooms, we have found that we soon are forced to replace Him with metal detectors, just to keep our kids from knifing and shooting each other to death.
The latest and most bitter fruit our society as a whole must swallow is that of the Liberal push for the Homosexual Agenda. As Dr. Alan Keyes made the point of during the last Presidential debates, when we excuse, and preach acceptance of, perversions of sexual deviancy, we open the door to making all forms of sexual perversion acceptable. After all, who is to judge?
If its okay him to to be queer, then why cant I be a pedophile? a necropheliac? a hamster humper?
The point being made here is that all of us have sexual urges. Sometimes they occur in the marketplace, or at our jobs, or on the beach. We as citizens of a civilized and moral society, however, are encouraged and expected to refrain from acting on these urges. Why? Because it is wrong to grab a cute girl at the checkout counter and start feeling her breasts, no matter how tempting they may appear.
Oddly, for the people in our society possessed of the male-female heterosexual norm, there are all sorts of things we cannot do, merely on the basis of right moral consideration. But should an individual desire homosexual deviancy, well then all of us should not only tell them that we think thats just swell, we have to allow our teachers to preach this Neo-Liberal-Gospel to our kids in our public classrooms.
When our teachers start telling our kids that once taboo lifestyle choices such as homosexuality or lesbianism are now accepted as just differences of personal choice which should be respected by all, then we as a society are saying that sexual perversion, and consequently predation, have become a protected right.
The door is open. Our slide down the slippery slope accelerates geometrically.
The problem here is that whether one is a Liberal or a Conservative, we all are forced to take this one up the backside. And that is wrong, it is evil, and it has no place in this country but for one sad fact: we are all to blame for this hideous re-definition of what America is, and what we all stand for.
It is our job, as a society, to discard the plastic notion of reluctance to speak out due to our having been programmed by the Liberals to respect that which is deemed (by them) to be Politically Correct. There is no Politically Correct.
There is in fact only right and wrong, and anyone who needs them explained has no place in a serious discussion where the lives and well-being of our children are concerned. Wake up, America. Smell the river. It stinks.
Read it three times... still doesn't make much sense to me.
(but I guess I'm not looking for a reason to bash homosexuals)
Maybe.... just maybe... the scummy bastards who kidnapped, raped, and killed those little girls are the ones responsible... and not homosexuals...
Ya think?
OWK is not from Oklahoma.
Ahhh.... Most think it... therefore it is so.
Stunning.
No, you kookie! Broad societal acceptance of sexual perversion emboldening more serious sexual criminals. Wait and see. I say this is just the tip of the iceberg.
And I thought that steroids were the big problem in MLB. Now you tell me homos are going to vote overwhelmingly to strike.
(any scoop on who is gay and which teams have the most?)
I see you've been drinking from the fount of political correctness and liberal-speak. You're obviously part of the problem.
Or perhaps he simply "remembered" something out of thin air.
Damn-straight.
If you don't blame the homos for the kidnapping, rape, and murder of young girls... you're part of the problem.
It's giving me some trouble as well. Tell you what, I'll ping a few logicians.
Can you please cite the statistics on this assertion? Also, please break it down by thread and length of membership. Thank you
Hmmm. As are the apparent fruits of a lax and permissively decaying moral fiber.
Try Bork's "Slouching Toward Gommorrah" if you really can't make the connection without being dragged to it by the ring(s) through your nose.
Homosexuals Molest Children At A Far Higher Rate Than Heterosexuals
Homosexuals account for only 1-2% of our population based on current surveys. The National Opinion Research Center in 1992 found that 2.8% of men and 1.4% of women identified themselves as homosexual or bisexual. A 1995 survey of 18-49-year-old men published by the Journal of Sex Research indicated that 2.6% of them had engaged in homosexual sex within the prior 12 months; 4% had had homosexual sex within the past five years. In other words, at least 98-99% of our population is heterosexual in orientation.
Homosexual activists routinely claim that most child molesters are heterosexual males, thus shifting the focus away from their own very high rates of molestation. Since 98-99% of the population is heterosexual, it is technically correct to say that most molestations are done by heterosexuals. However, statistics indicate that homosexuals pose a far more serious threat to children than do heterosexuals.
For example: In 1987, Dr. Stephen Rubin of Whitman College conducted a ten-state study of sex abuse cases involving school teachers. He studied 199 cases. Of those, 122 male teachers had molested girls, while 14 female teachers had molested boys. He also discovered that 59 homosexual male teachers had molested boys and four female homosexual teachers had molested girls. In other words, 32 percent of those child molestation cases involved homosexuals. Nearly a third of these cases come from only 1-2% of the population.
Dr. Judith Reisman, in her book, Kinsey, Crimes & Consequences, describes the research done by Dr. Gene Abel. This researcher compared the molestation rates of self-confessed homosexual and heterosexual child molesters. In a sample of 153 homosexual molesters, they confessed to a total of 22,981 molestations. This is equivalent to 150 children per molester. Self-admitted heterosexual molesters admitted to 4,435 molestations. This comes to 19.8 victims per molester. Dr. Abel concluded that homosexuals sexually molest young boys at an incidence that is occurring from five times greater than the molestation of girls.
This high rate of molestations by homosexuals is consistent with other studies conducted during the past several decades. Here are just a few studies that show homosexuals molesting children at epidemic rates:
The Los Angeles Times conducted a survey in 1985 of 2,628 adults across the U.S. Of those, 27% of the women and 16% of the men had been sexually molested. Seven percent of the girls and 93% of the men had been molested by adults of the same sex. This means that 40% of child molestations were by homosexuals. (Los Angeles Times, August 25-6, 1985)
In 1984, a Vermont survey of 161 adolescents who were sex offenders found that 35 of them were homosexuals (22%). (Wasserman, J., Adolescent Sex OffendersVermont, 1984 Journal American Medical Association, 1986; 255:181-2)
In 1991, of the 100 child molesters at the Massachusetts Treatment Center for Sexually Dangerous Persons, a third were heterosexual, a third were bisexual, and a third were homosexual. (Dr. Raymond Knight, Differential Prevalence of Personality Disorders in Rapists and Child Molesters, Eastern Psychological Association Conference, New York, April 12, 1991)
Drs. Freund and Heasman of the Clark Institute of Psychiatry in Toronto reviewed two studies on child molesters and calculated that 34% and 32% of the sex offenders were homosexual. In cases these doctors had handled, 36% of the molesters were homosexuals. (Freund, K. Pedophilia and Heterosexuality vs. Homosexuality, Journal of Sex & Marital Therapy, 1984; 10:193-200)
From these studies and many more, it is evident that homosexuals molest children at a far greater rate than do their heterosexual counterparts. While they comprise only 1-2% of the population, they are responsible for upwards of a third or more of all sexual molestations of children.
LINK
I'll see what else I can find.
Hampster humper, I love it. Reminds me of the thread a couple weeks back about the guy who put the tube up his lover's rear and then sent their pet gerbil up the tube. When the gerbil would not come out, the friend lit a match to try to attract the gerbil to the light. Instead he ignited gasses in the guy's intestines and literallly burned his butt.
Please cite the proof that OWK has rings in his nose.
Nipples maybe,,but nose? No way.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.