Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

MARTHA STEWART SAID TO SEE POLITICAL CONSPIRACY; REPUBLICANS PROBE 'SEX LIFE'
DrudgeReport.com ^ | August 18, 2002 | Matt Drudge

Posted on 08/18/2002 6:10:56 PM PDT by Paul Atreides

Embattled media mogul Martha Stewart is said to see a political conspiracy behind the deepening investigation into her questionable stock trades, the DRUDGE REPORT has learned.

"Martha really believes it is the Republicans who are behind this -- and they are chasing her for purely political reasons," a Stewart intimate said this weekend.

"Martha told me that she believes they are doing the very same thing to her, they did to President Clinton. What Ken Starr did. She believes it is nothing short of a witch hunt! They are even digging into her private e-mails! They are demanding to know who she's dated. Martha said to me, 'Can you believe they want to know who I'm dating?' Republicans on Capitol Hill are probing her sex life!"

MORE

The close Stewart friend, who demanded not to be named out of fear of being dragged into the investigation, spoke just hours after Justice Department officials sacked her stockbroker's offices - removing boxes of evidence related to the ImClone stock scandal.

"Who runs the Justice Department? Republicans. Who runs the House of Representatives, and these committees looking into Martha? The Republicans," said the Stewart friend. "Guess who is a major force in raising money and contributing to Democrats?"

[Last year Billionaire Stewart contributed $125,000 in soft money to Democratic accounts, records show.]

The close Stewart friend predicted Americans will rally behind Stewart the same way many did with President Clinton during his impeachment.

"Once all the facts come out about this abuse of power, about these subpoenas, which ask for every detail on Martha's very private life, people will come to her side."

A spokesman for the House Energy and Commerce Committee strongly denied congressional investigators are being motivated out of any political concern and noted questions about a subject's personal contacts with other individuals are standard.

Developing...


TOPICS: News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: bakefileinacake; insidertrading; itsabadthing; kmartdroppingher; marthastewart; marthastewartlying
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 201-220221-240241-260261-268 last
To: nopardons
I think Joy Angela's theory is interesting. Notice that The National Enquirer is leaking the story about the boyfriend and the news of more insider trading. It sounds to me like they are TRYING to get Congress to question her about her sex life.

I don't think that Martha is necessarily a substitute for Hillary, but I DO think that excessive investigation of her life will be used by the Rats as "proof" that the Republicans are mean-spirited, sex-obsessed, misogynists.

261 posted on 08/20/2002 2:28:38 AM PDT by Miss Marple
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 260 | View Replies]

To: Miss Marple
I don't think that Martha is necessarily a substitute for Hillary, but I DO think that excessive investigation of her life will be used by the Rats as "proof" that the Republicans are mean-spirited, sex-obsessed, misogynists.

I don't see how they can do that. This is an investigation into one phone call, and whether or not she was tipped off. Sex doesn't enter into it, unless she got hot and heavy with the commodities trader in that 11 minute call. And if she did, Martha Stewart being in the throes of passion is, as I say, not something civilised people want to know about.

Did she or did she get a tip she shouldn't have. If the Republicans stick to that, I don't see how the Democrats can spin it as being somehow mean-spirited. Meanwhile those of us who think Martha is just another Hillary, can watch the fun of her Gotterdammerung. ;)

Best Regards, Ivan

262 posted on 08/20/2002 2:32:10 AM PDT by MadIvan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 261 | View Replies]

To: MadIvan
That's the whole point. First there was the story from Drudge accusing the Republicans of investigating her sex life. The the Enquirer (arm of the Clintons) runs a story about a boyfriend who has more infor on insider trading.

The Republicans need to be very careful about this, in my opinion. If they stick to phone calls and documents, they will be ok.

263 posted on 08/20/2002 2:45:29 AM PDT by Miss Marple
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 262 | View Replies]

To: nopardons; All
Rush Limbaugh is saying today that the Democrats are probably setting Martha Stewart up to try to make the GOP look bad... Well, I also see Stewart as being sacrificed, but most likely to benefit Hillary ...

See post 257 for details how Martha may be taking the heat for Hillary....

264 posted on 08/20/2002 11:14:42 AM PDT by Joy Angela
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 260 | View Replies]

To: mountaineer
Why is this crap before congress? Where is Elliot Spitzer? Why not ask for an indictment?

If she was a white, male, comservative she would be in handcuff's all ready.

She should be convicted of stupidity.

And, of course, in everyone's rush to political correctness, she is STILL a member of the BOD of the NYSE.

265 posted on 08/20/2002 9:10:28 PM PDT by mcenedo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: mountaineer
If you can't stand the heat get out of the kitchen
266 posted on 08/20/2002 9:18:50 PM PDT by Crazymonarch
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Miss Marple
Joy's hypothosis is twaddle !

The Dems can NOT use this tactic; not now and NOT for Martha ! If they even try it, they'll be laughed at. Either Martha and ALL of those who had a hand in the insider trading are looked at, or they're not. If they're not, then the blame falls on the Dems !

Martha has had more than just this run in, with the Enquirer, and don't forget that she folded, the last time. It's not her " sex life " , which is the nub of their story. I read most of it, whilst waiting in line at the grocery store. They were chiding the Microsoft guy, who talked about it, BUT , and here's the INTERESTING part, spilling beans about yet MORE insider trading that he and Martha had been involved in. I doubt that the Republicans will even touch whatever she and he did sexually. One hopes that they get to the bottom of the insider trading matter, though. :-)

267 posted on 08/20/2002 10:18:59 PM PDT by nopardons
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 261 | View Replies]

To: Joy Angela
Rush is NOT always correct and in this instance, he is absolutely, 100 % wrong. The Enquirer had the story out PRIOR to Drudge. Guess where Drudge got it ? Guess where Martha got this ?

Martha is nuts ; has been for decades. This bald faced attempt to " pull a Hillary " , won't get her anywhere. WHY ? Well, first of all, Martha Stewart is NOT a politician , a politician's wife, holds NO elected office, and nether the committee, nor the SEC are looking into her sex life. There is NO " Special Prosicutor " and frankly, she just looks like a moron, for even bringing this up. This has NOTHING , whatsoever, to do with Hitlery, and anyone who imagines that it does, is falling for Martha's spin.

Now, don't you feel just a wee bit silly, for having fallen for such a palpable fraud, perpitrated by Martha, the high priestess of fraud ?

268 posted on 08/20/2002 10:26:42 PM PDT by nopardons
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 264 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 201-220221-240241-260261-268 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson