Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Iraqi War Began Four Days Ago
DebkaFiles ^ | 10 Aug 2002 | DebkaFiles

Posted on 08/10/2002 9:05:25 PM PDT by greggy

US Iraq Campaign Has Its First Engagement
DEBKAfileSpecial Military Analysis

10 August: America’s offensive against Saddam Hussein’s regime in Iraq has begun as an exercise in gradualism rather than a D-Day drama. DEBKAfile ’s military sources report that tens of thousands of US, British, French, Netherlands, Australian troops may take part in the campaign, openly or covertly, but not in massive waves that fling themselves telegenically on Baghdad...

Tuesday August 6, at 0800 hours Middle East time, US and British air bombers went into action and destroyed the Iraqi air command and control center at al-Nukhaib in the desert between Iraq and Saudi Arabia. The center contained advanced fiber optic networks recently installed by Chinese companies. DEBKA-Net-Weekly’s military sources say the raid made military history. For the first time, the US air force used new precision-guided bombs capable of locating and destroying fiber optic systems. The existence of such weaponry was hitherto unknown. Following the destruction of the facility, about 260 miles (415 kilometers), southwest of Baghdad, waves of US warplanes swept in from the Prince Sultan air base in Saudi Arabia and from US aircraft carriers in the Gulf and flew over the Iraqi capital. The Iraqi air force and anti-aircraft system held their fire on orders from above. This deep air penetration told the Americans that the early warning radar system protecting Baghdad and its environs from intrusion by enemy aircraft and missiles was inactive...

Iraq’s military passivity in the face of US-led advances and strikes is beginning to worry the American, Turkish and Israeli high commands. They suspect that Saddam is playing the same fog-of-war game as Washington, so as to put them to sleep and then catch them unawares. Such sudden action could take the form of an Iraqi missile or bomber attack on Israel using warheads loaded with radioactive, chemical or biological materials, a combined missile-terrorist strike to sabotage Saudi oil fields, or a mass terrorist attack in the United States. The sharpest alert to a threat to Iraq’s southern neighbors came not from military intelligence but from international oil dealers, who warned that Saddam Hussein if attacked may well decide to set fire to Saudi and Kuwaiti oil fields, sending oil prices skyrocketing above US$ 40 per barrel....

(Excerpt) Read more at debka.com ...


TOPICS: Foreign Affairs; Government; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: america; bush; iraq; saddam; war
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 101-103 next last
To: Spiff
It wouldn't surprise me. We were all impressed with a smart bomb going down a residential chimney 12 years ago...
21 posted on 08/10/2002 9:38:38 PM PDT by ovrtaxt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: xzins
Interesting

My thoughts exactly

22 posted on 08/10/2002 9:39:04 PM PDT by P-Marlowe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: greggy
"if it is true" LET'S ROLL
23 posted on 08/10/2002 9:42:18 PM PDT by Sir Beowolf
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Dog Gone
Not trying to be argumentative, but the southern no-fly zone is actually the one that is closest to Baghdad.

Check this out.
 


24 posted on 08/10/2002 9:42:31 PM PDT by DoughtyOne
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: greggy
...They suspect that Saddam is playing the same fog-of-war game as Washington, so as to put them to sleep and then catch them unawares.

Yeah, right. Dream on. When the move against Iraq happens, it will be like sh*t through a goose.

25 posted on 08/10/2002 9:44:54 PM PDT by Mad_Tom_Rackham
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mad_Tom_Rackham
We couldnt get Saddam last time... what makes anyone think our goals will be different this time, with respect to killing the guy?
26 posted on 08/10/2002 9:47:12 PM PDT by Righter-than-Rush
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: greggy
very doubtful.
27 posted on 08/10/2002 9:51:28 PM PDT by rwfromkansas
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: umgud
I thought the Saudis wouldn't let us use their bases to to wage war with Iraq.

Well, not publicly.

If this article is true, it describes a good strategy. Not known to many is that Clinton bombed Iraq all through the late 90's, IIRC, but there was very little attention paid to it.

I'm not defending Clinton, but I'm saying that there would be no lack of precedent for taking out various targets there thoughout the years.

28 posted on 08/10/2002 9:53:23 PM PDT by Dec31,1999
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Righter-than-Rush
Well, my understanding is that we (= the coalition) wanted to leave him in power last time, ostensibly as a means of preventing an islamist takeover of Iraq. Methinks that post 9-11, the risk of allowing SWaddam Insane in power, in a position of unleashing chemical/biological/nuclear weapons against the West (through proxy fighters), is too great. I agree with the current proposition. He should be "replaced", the sooner the better. He could have been killed the last time. He will be killed this time. This is of course only my opinion.
29 posted on 08/10/2002 9:54:00 PM PDT by Mad_Tom_Rackham
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: ovrtaxt
That was quite impressive. We should do more of that, but in Saudi Arabia, which is also our enemy.
30 posted on 08/10/2002 9:56:12 PM PDT by Dec31,1999
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: Mad_Tom_Rackham
I agree. But it makes me wonder why we are not ready to attach Saudi as well at this time. Useful idiots?

We could use the oil cut-off as a signal to develop alternate sources.

31 posted on 08/10/2002 9:59:26 PM PDT by Dec31,1999
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: greggy
Oh Debka, if only you were right this time...
32 posted on 08/10/2002 10:03:12 PM PDT by Petronski
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Dog Gone
I like that phrase.
33 posted on 08/10/2002 10:09:14 PM PDT by Bogey78O
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Spiff
It may be possible. Unlikely though. Any piece of electronic equipment puts out an electronic signature. All you'd have to do is lock onto it with some sort of guidance system. Afte all a heat seeking missile locks onto the radiation on the Infra-red spectrum why not find a way to lock onto frequencies in other spectrums.
34 posted on 08/10/2002 10:11:31 PM PDT by Bogey78O
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: Dec31,1999
it makes me wonder why we are not ready to attach Saudi as well at this time.

Agreed. But it seems that diplomacy is generally conducted at an imperceptable level, except for the pronouncements that are intended to pacify the masses. I think that the message you mentioned has already been delivered loud and clear behind the scenes. The Saudi's have few friends since Sir Lawrence left town, excepting the corporate oil interests. And they really don't care who runs the country, as long as the oil flows west.

35 posted on 08/10/2002 10:12:00 PM PDT by Mad_Tom_Rackham
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: greggy
Doh! I've been Debka'd...
36 posted on 08/10/2002 10:13:32 PM PDT by TheDon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mad_Tom_Rackham
well said.
37 posted on 08/10/2002 10:21:16 PM PDT by spyone
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: Mad_Tom_Rackham
Also agreed. However, the Saudi family may be our best choice of useful idiots at this perilous time. It could be worse, what with all those Islamic fanatics there beaming with pride. And they are. Trust me on this one.

If there isn't a lot going on behind the scenes, there damn well should be.

They got to destroy the entire WTC and come out smelling like roses. This shall not stand.


38 posted on 08/10/2002 10:35:56 PM PDT by Dec31,1999
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: greggy
Debka is actually reporting on an trans-probablity extra-dimensional space. They actually do a terrific job of getting the alternate-facts straight. Its just a shame that it bears so little signifigance for our own spot in the space-time continuum.
39 posted on 08/10/2002 10:36:17 PM PDT by Arkinsaw
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: greggy
DEBKA should change their name to COMEDY CENTRAL!
40 posted on 08/10/2002 10:36:45 PM PDT by Cold Heat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 101-103 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson