Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Smallpox Apocalypse
The Strategy Page ^ | July 22, 2002 | Tom Holsinger

Posted on 07/24/2002 3:14:24 PM PDT by spycatcher


Smallpox Apocalypse
by Tom Holsinger
July 22, 2002

A major smallpox attack on America would spiral overseas into the greatest catastrophe in history unless we resume preventive vaccinations. The epidemic would probably kill a tenth of the human race.

This is, fortunately, unlikely as the perpetrators would gain nothing. America would suffer among the least, while Muslim countries would suffer among the most. Terrorist states and extremist Islam will be annihilated, and not merely at American hands.

Smallpox is violently contagious with an unvaccinated 30% fatality rate. Survivors are disfigured. We have just enough vaccine for all Americans, Mexicans and Canadians. Perhaps one in a million will die from vaccination, while more will be disabled. Newer vaccines are safer. Rapid production of less effective vaccine using raw cowpox might be possible, but distribution in undeveloped countries during a world epidemic is problematic.

Last ditch protection is "variolation" - deliberately infecting people with smallpox pus - to create a less dangerous form of smallpox. This kills 1-2 per hundred. Speedy variolation of whole populations requires many existing victims plus great social discipline, and is least likely to work in undeveloped countries most in need of it.

The immune-impaired are far more vulnerable to infection but cannot be safely vaccinated. All infected will die.

Terrorists could start a smallpox epidemic here, without suicide volunteers, if Iraq helps or they obtain xSoviet smallpox. Weaponized smallpox powder reportedly drifted from an abandoned xSoviet biowar facility to infect the crew of a fishing vessel passing downwind. The unvaccinated crew died while all the vaccinated contracted smallpox, but survived. Smallpox powder is the nightmare scenario.

The best defense is mass pre-attack vaccination because the attack wouldn't happen due to being obviously futile. Voluntary pre-attack vaccination of just 10-15% of adults would vastly facilitate post-attack inoculation of everyone else. The vaccinated could maintain order and essential services while the unvaccinated hide in their homes pending inoculation.

The federal health establishment opposes even voluntary vaccination, contending it would kill too many people. Some other agenda is clearly involved given that the whooping cough vaccine mandatory for infants is as dangerous as existing smallpox vaccine.

That agenda is denial. They've spent their whole lives trying to eradicate smallpox, and can't adjust to 9/11. Obstructing vaccination lets them continue to deny that their life's work was wasted. Their institutional cultures and individual agendas mean they'll come up with other reasons against voluntary inoculation with emerging safer vaccines, and obstruct orders to permit it.

President Bush will have to spend too much of his time making a balky bureaucracy obey. Voluntary vaccination can only work if implementation responsibility is taken from federal health authorities, possibly by delegation to the states with funding. That would require Presidential involvement only once.

But the nightmare could start before then. Federal planners, excepting FEMA's Office of Emergency Preparedness, are clueless about public behavior in emergencies. They assume, as in Cold War plans, that people will act normally during the apocalypse instead of fleeing to the hills in panic, all without needing food, fuel, etc. Comical examples exist.

Post-attack inoculation will be additionally disrupted by 50+ million Mexicans surging here seeking vaccine not available in Mexico. That would magnify America's own panic, violence and collapsing civil infrastructure. All this is ignored so the federal health establishment can pretend their plan will work.

Worse, knowledge that they made the epidemic possible by obstructing pre-attack vaccination, repeated displays of politically correct federal stupidity concerning terrorism, and the arrival of millions of perceived infected Mexicans, will shatter public confidence. Americans will feel they must save themselves in defiance of a government whose incompetence caused the disaster. This is a prescription for chaos.

Fortunately the federal government is not our only government. State and local governments have always been our bulwark against disasters, and smallpox will be no exception. Additionally the American people will spontaneously organize themselves - consider Flight 93. We'll muddle through somehow, at higher cost, because we have enough vaccine, even for Mexico.

The rest of the world won't be so lucky. A significant outbreak here would unavoidably spread, including to countries where it would be unstoppable for lack of vaccine and social cohesion.

The leading disaster area will be sub-Saharan Africa due to AIDS. At least half its 500 million people will die. 10-15% fatalities of the 1.7 billion in India, Pakistan and the Arab world is not unreasonable. These areas' probable fatalities total 400-500 million, so 100-200 million more fatalities among the world's other 3.9 billion, mostly in Southeast Asia and South America, make 10% total smallpox fatalities worldwide quite possible. Most American dead - several million is reasonable if it starts here - will be immune-impaired, assuming most of the latter avoid infection. They might not.

There'd be hundreds million more dead from secondary causes - social collapse, genocidal nuclear attack on terrorist states, etc. The economic consequences would be ghastly. Most of the world participates in the money economy, unlike the 1930's, so the worst and longest depression in history would start.

Social effects would be awful too, notably here. Watching millions of us die horribly, with more millions disfigured, will scar America's psyche and self-image. Civil liberties and immigration would be savagely affected. Almost all Muslim immigrants would be deported - some would be lynched.

The American people will have a reckoning with Washington for wrecking the country by giving its games priority over our survival. Few in Congress will be re-elected, and President Bush would likely be removed earlier for "failure to perform his office".

Worse, public rage at all things federal would make significant Constitutional changes quite possible. Even an all-new Congress might not be trusted to propose suitable amendments. This could result in the states calling a second Constitutional Convention.

We might not be Americans afterwards, which would be terrorism's ultimate victory. The Bush Administration risks America's future by not letting us volunteer for smallpox vaccinations.

But that has its own risks. Next: DOING IT TO OURSELVES - Vaccination and the Immune-Impaired.

Tom Holsinger is a California attorney and wargaming grognard. He began writing for Strategy Page in April 2002 when Jim Dunnigan asked him to rewrite an email for publication.



TOPICS: Anthrax Scare; Culture/Society; Editorial; Extended News; Government
KEYWORDS: biologicalwarfare; biologicalweapons; bioterror; biowar; plague; smallpox; vaccination
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081 next last
To: Travis McGee; Thinkin' Gal; Jeremiah Jr; babylonian; Crazymonarch; crystalk; happygrl; Yehuda; ...
2Th 2:9 Even him, whose coming is after the working of Satan with all power and signs and lying wonders,
10 And with all deceivableness of unrighteousness in them that perish; because they received not the love of the truth, that they might be saved.
11 And for this cause God shall send them strong delusion*, that they should believe a lie:
12 That they all might be damned who believed not the truth, but had pleasure in unrighteousness.

This is the "Smallpox Vaccination" *Strong DelusionBeware.

Don't drink the government Kool-aid regardless of how tasty it is advertised.

Check out "bio-war" on Google.  Also check out "population control."

41 posted on 07/25/2002 1:42:40 AM PDT by 2sheep
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: spycatcher
...post-attack inoculation will be additionally disrupted by 50+ million Mexicans surging here seeking vaccine not available in Mexico. That would magnify America's own panic, violence and collapsing civil infrastructure....

We don't need 50 million Mexicans to magnify America's panic, Holsinger.

All we need is the constant procession of alarmist scum like you, who have found there's a media dollar to be made by yelling 'fire!' in a crowded theatre. As far as I'm concerned people like you should be arrested- the charge, needlessly sowing concern amongst the public, for personal advantage.

42 posted on 07/25/2002 1:52:42 AM PDT by Byron_the_Aussie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: spodefly; Paid4This; spycatcher; wardaddy
If anyone here has any links to the latest thought from viroligists on the efficacy of the vaccine 30+ years later, I am interested to read it.
And Now, the Good News about Smallpox...
...data from a 1902-1903 smallpox outbreak in Liverpool, England, strongly suggests otherwise. A study analyzed the impact of the disease on 1,163 Liverpudlians, 943 who received the vaccine during infancy, and 220 who were never vaccinated. The study further separated people by age and by the severity of their disease. In the oldest age group, 50 and above, 93 percent of the vaccinated people escaped severe disease and death. In contrast, 50 percent of the unvaccinated in that age bracket died, and another 25 percent had severe disease. To put it plainly, the vaccine offered remarkable protection after 50 years.
LINK



43 posted on 07/25/2002 2:02:50 AM PDT by Sabertooth
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: wardaddy
...this stuff is like chicken pox on steroids.

Actually, Chicken Pox is not a true pox at all, but a herpes virus.




44 posted on 07/25/2002 2:06:21 AM PDT by Sabertooth
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: gg188
You were not supposed to see that word. It is kind of like seeing the fnords.

Actually, it means "experienced war-gamer."

45 posted on 07/25/2002 4:15:10 AM PDT by eno_
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: EternalHope
Smallpox is LESS useable as weapon because its spread would be uncontrollable. You do not blow up somebody if the bomb will get you too.

Somehow I don't think that line of reasoning applies to Muslim jihadists -- at least not to the kind that engaged in 9/11 and the various Israeli bombings

The kind of people who would use smallpox as a weapon have had some time to produce at least some vaccine for their own people. I think some would think it worth killing half the worlds population in order to take down the US

46 posted on 07/25/2002 4:41:59 AM PDT by SauronOfMordor
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: EternalHope
Russia has offered us her vaccine, I think for free. We could certainly buy it.
47 posted on 07/25/2002 4:55:56 AM PDT by aristeides
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: EternalHope; The Great Satan
'Course, all bets are off if you are insane. Is Saddam insane?

Not insane if you have the vaccine to immunize your population. Do we know that Saddam does not have the vaccine? (Remember, we know the Iraqis have been experimenting with camelpox. If you can be immunized against smallpox with cowpox, I would imagine camelpox will also do the job.)

48 posted on 07/25/2002 4:58:41 AM PDT by aristeides
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: gg188
Does anyone know what a "grognard" is?

I thought I knew French, but I had to look this word up. It means "grumbler," but it was also a slang term for veterans of Napoleon's armies.

49 posted on 07/25/2002 5:00:28 AM PDT by aristeides
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: wardaddy; Squantos; maica; Freee-dame; pocat
Re: Smallpox supposedly in October 2001 the order was placed for enough smallpox vacine to fully vacinate the American population. The delivery was to take place over the next twelve months so that by October 2002 this nation would have sufficient new full strength vacine to provide coverage for every American. The fact that they are discussing the strategies for providing the vacine to the population means that a large part of the new vacine is on hand.

IF Iraq has powdered small pox then perhaps they would trigger release of that viral agent upon the institution of a mass vacination program. Clearly there would be many who would blame the vacine for the outbreak and the resultant chaos would be worse.

As to the effect of the old cacinations - they have some marginal effectiveness but are one is probably not completely immune. The more booster shots one has had for smallpox the more likely one is to be immune. Sometimes with second and third vacinations the oozing sore and the scar are almost negligable. The cowpox vacination method is 18th Century technology and George Washington agreed to be vacinated with this vacine as a means of encouraging others to get their shots. Yes, he was immune due to an earlier case of smallpox he had sufffered while traveling in the West Indies.

Most interesting is the analysis of the inertial that is so rampant throughout the establishments in DC. So many of these functionaries still do not understand the rules should have changed as of 9/11. If Al Qaeda is intentionally waiting for a follow on major attack then it is a brilliant strategy. They are presuming the natural disputatiosness of American politics will paralyze the USA in retatialtory action within a short time and given the Democrats behavior recently they may well be correct.

Stay well - Stay safe - Stay armed - Yorktown

50 posted on 07/25/2002 7:13:03 AM PDT by harpseal
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: aristeides
Saddam does not care if his people are vaccinated or not. In his mind (IMO) his people are pawns, useable goods to be manipulated as he sees fit to achieve his insane religous, fanatical goals. The man is a lunatic who is smart enough and evil enough to create a situation that kills 100's of millions of people.
51 posted on 07/25/2002 7:51:56 AM PDT by Rebelbase
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]

To: Rebelbase
Pawns are more useful if they stay alive.

I was not aware that Saddam's goals were religious. The man is an admirer of Stalin, after all.

52 posted on 07/25/2002 7:55:40 AM PDT by aristeides
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies]

To: Byron_the_Aussie
"All we need is the constant procession of alarmist scum like you, who have found there's a media dollar to be made by yelling 'fire!' in a crowded theatre. As far as I'm concerned people like you should be arrested- the charge, needlessly sowing concern amongst the public, for personal advantage. "

I disagree. The scenarios laid out in the article are highly possible and probable.

My good friend who passed away last year used to tell me he did not like reading articles about terrorism because, as he said, "I'd rather think about nicer stuff, like reading People Magazine". To to many Americans have their heads buried in the sands of delusion and live in fear of knowing the truth.

It is time the American people stop living in denial and face up to the harsh reality of the world we are now living in.

53 posted on 07/25/2002 8:03:09 AM PDT by Rebelbase
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: aristeides
IMO, Saddam uses religion as a vehicle to further his goal, which is the complete destruction of Israel and by assoication, the USA.
54 posted on 07/25/2002 8:04:41 AM PDT by Rebelbase
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies]

To: harpseal
IF Iraq has powdered small pox then perhaps they would trigger release of that viral agent upon the institution of a mass vacination program. Clearly there would be many who would blame the vacine for the outbreak and the resultant chaos would be worse.

Smallpox can't be triggered by the vaccine, since it's cowpox. Much of any potential hysteria can be pre-empted with that information.




55 posted on 07/25/2002 8:11:04 AM PDT by Sabertooth
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: EternalHope
'Course, all bets are off if you are insane. Is Saddam insane?

From his standpoint, it's not insane to threaten to bring the house down if we take him out -- as Bush has now promised to do. In principle, this is no different from the MAD policy which the nuclear powers have subscribed to for decades.

56 posted on 07/25/2002 9:39:11 AM PDT by The Great Satan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: Sabertooth
While most people who are informed about medical matters understand this we do have enviro wackos who would insist on blaming the vacine. I know it is not rational but the Democrats would of course pander to them as they make up a large part of the enviro-wacko support they get. On the plus side we may presume large numbers of these enviro wackos who so abhor any modern technology but live in cities will abjure vacination and suffer a much higher infection/death rate.

Stay well - Stay safe - Stay armed - Yorktown

57 posted on 07/25/2002 10:00:10 AM PDT by harpseal
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 55 | View Replies]

To: harpseal
"If Al Qaeda is intentionally waiting for a follow on major attack then it is a brilliant strategy."

I don't think they're so well organized. But they could be with Iraqi help.

58 posted on 07/25/2002 11:21:24 AM PDT by Thud
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: Sabertooth
"Smallpox can't be triggered by the vaccine, since it's cowpox."

Smallpox vaccine is not based on cowpox. It uses a different virus. The article implied it would be pretty easy to make a bunch of cowpox and use that to protect against smallpox in the absence of special-purpose vaccine, but that cowpox wouldn't work as well as the special-purpose vaccine designed for use against smallpox.

59 posted on 07/25/2002 11:26:02 AM PDT by Thud
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 55 | View Replies]

To: Thud
Smallpox vaccine is not based on cowpox. It uses a different virus.

That doesn't concur with anything I've read, nor statements from some of the FReeper docs in this forum.

Gotta source for that?

The article implied it would be pretty easy to make a bunch of cowpox and use that to protect against smallpox in the absence of special-purpose vaccine, but that cowpox wouldn't work as well as the special-purpose vaccine designed for use against smallpox.

I looked in the article for where you took this inference, and I'm guessing this is it...

Perhaps one in a million will die from vaccination, while more will be disabled. Newer vaccines are safer. Rapid production of less effective vaccine using raw cowpox might be possible, but distribution in undeveloped countries during a world epidemic is problematic.

I don't believe this is saying that the newer vaccines aren't cowpox-based, just that they're a safer form of it. The distinction being made is between cowpox-based vaccines and raw cowpox inoculation.




60 posted on 07/25/2002 12:03:11 PM PDT by Sabertooth
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 59 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson