Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Why Did Prohibition Require a Constitutional Amendment?

Posted on 07/23/2002 9:06:57 AM PDT by Maceman

I have been wondering lately how come the US Government needed a constitutional amendment to outlaw alcohol, but did not need one to outlaw marijuana and other drugs.

Can any scholarly Freepers explain this to me? As always, your briliant insights, cogent reasoning, encyclopedic historical knowledge and smart-assed remarks wlil be eagerly appreciated.


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Government; Philosophy
KEYWORDS: constitution; prohibtition; wod
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 141-144 next last
To: Maceman
I this day and time, the constitution doesn't matter if the gov't wants to do social engineering.

Can't ban guns? Make them very costly and hard to get, sue the manufacturers, work toward banning all but gov't approved firearms, throw up every roadblock you can.

Don't want smokers? Raise taxes, sue the tobacco makers, vilify and belittle smokers.........

Don't want SUV's?.............

21 posted on 07/23/2002 9:23:49 AM PDT by umgud
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Wolfie
When did Coca Cola take the "coke" out of Coke?
22 posted on 07/23/2002 9:25:27 AM PDT by ken5050
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: steve50
bump
23 posted on 07/23/2002 9:26:29 AM PDT by bassmaner
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: WindMinstrel
It appears I may have been more right than wrong. The Boggs Act of 1951 and the Daniels Act of 1956 were where MJ use was criminalized. From '37-'51 you merely needed tax stamps to posess it.
24 posted on 07/23/2002 9:27:57 AM PDT by AdA$tra
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: AdA$tra
posess = possess: There is your spelling error
25 posted on 07/23/2002 9:30:55 AM PDT by AdA$tra
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: ken5050
1903
26 posted on 07/23/2002 9:32:15 AM PDT by Wolfie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: AdA$tra
NOOOOOOOO! It doesn't count if you find the spelling error! I have to find it and loudly denounce you for it!
27 posted on 07/23/2002 9:32:55 AM PDT by WindMinstrel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: WindMinstrel
Nit wit, there's only one "O" in "NO".
28 posted on 07/23/2002 9:33:48 AM PDT by Wolfie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: Wolfie
LOL!!
29 posted on 07/23/2002 9:35:11 AM PDT by FreeTally
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: rhombus
Thanks,and a very good question. I'm looking forward to this thread,since accurate and cogent knowledge is always useful.
30 posted on 07/23/2002 9:35:44 AM PDT by sawsalimb
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Wolfie
You hurt my feelings! You made me sad. Don't you know I have a right to not be sad? Fie on you.
31 posted on 07/23/2002 9:36:05 AM PDT by WindMinstrel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: Maceman
MaryJane is legal under certain conditions in Alaska.
Where does the federal law kick in?
32 posted on 07/23/2002 9:38:09 AM PDT by Semper Paratus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Maceman
Because back then we still had a valid Constitution.
33 posted on 07/23/2002 9:43:14 AM PDT by brityank
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sawsalimb
http://www.druglibrary.org/schaffer/index.HTM

Lot of good info at schaffer if you want some reading
34 posted on 07/23/2002 9:43:29 AM PDT by steve50
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: WindMinstrel
Fie on you

Sicking those bastards on me, are you? Now I have to constantly keep watch for Frenchman with epees. I swear, I'll get you for this.

35 posted on 07/23/2002 9:47:15 AM PDT by Wolfie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: Maceman
Just a guess...

Because the teetotalers were getting nowhere at the local level?
36 posted on 07/23/2002 9:47:31 AM PDT by Desdemona
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Maceman
You can add the 19th ammendment to the list- Women's sufferage. Many States and Counties already gave women the right to vote before the ammendment was passed.

I also have questions about the need for the 24th. Preventing a poll tax could have been done via federal law.

Also the 26th, lower the voting age to 18. Not because federal law could have allowed this, it justed turned out to be a stupid idea.

37 posted on 07/23/2002 9:52:01 AM PDT by 11th Commandment
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Maceman
After FDR the government decided it didn't need to amend the constitution every time it wanted to make a stupid socialistic expansion of the government. With the recent revealation that even Reagan raised taxes I must conclude we haven't had a conservative President since Coolidge.
38 posted on 07/23/2002 9:52:04 AM PDT by weikel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: AdA$tra
The thing is you needed the marijuana in hand to get the stamps thus you were already breaking the law.
39 posted on 07/23/2002 9:52:59 AM PDT by weikel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: steve50
Thanks-need to do some research.
40 posted on 07/23/2002 10:06:06 AM PDT by sawsalimb
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 141-144 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson