Posted on 07/19/2002 6:45:08 AM PDT by Stand Watch Listen
Now there´s a story that disappeared in a hurry. Earlier in the month, there was a two day media aneurysm over former Hollywood super-agent Michael Ovitz saying he was done in by the "Gay Mafia." If Elliot Ness were alive today, he would have little choice but to relinquish the title of his crimefighting unit, "The Untouchables" to the Gay Mafia.
There is no more powerful, media-savvy agenda, dominating print, TV and movies. The connecting adhesive that hardens its compelling influence is homosexual equivalency, intolerance of Judeo-Christian values and the concept of judgment. They advance on a moral relativism that argues that G-d, faith and all expressions of religiosity, be discredited, diminished and otherwise forsaken. Those who disagree are closed-minded, ignorant, and "outside of the mainstream," whatever that means.
What is the Gay Mafia and how is it defined? It is the systematic projection and defense of a position on homosexual conduct. It probes the public domain for any objections, isolating and accusing all opposition as bigots and homophobes. Gay rights activists employ rhetoric, psychology, the subtle persuasion of message repetition, and the media
all the elements of modern marketing to frame the discussion on their terms.
Michael Ovitz may have been the arrogant, egomaniac talent agent as has been described, but be absolutely sure that when he said there was a Gay Mafia, he was telling the truth. When his quote and explanation for using it, appeared in more detail in a Vanity Fair interview, Hollywood power brokers convulsed with righteous indignation. Demands for retractions, revenge, promises that "he´ll never work in this town issued profusely. David Geffen was beside himself.
Strange isn´t it? Deafly silent about suicide bombers, catastrophic Wall Street criminality, and rewriting scripts to eliminate references to Islamic terrorism, give the Left in Hollywood a "gay mafia" quote from an insider, and the spin machine goes ballistic. To prove the point, Ovitz immediately issued an apology. The damage was done, but the truth in his statement gave pause for reflection on what it all means.
The Gay Mafia operates like a machine in what is called the "free press," exacts punishment when denied its ultimatum in public schools, and on a global scale, defines AIDS as the most important issue on the planet. As the next aggressive phase of front page headlines screams across the marxian print media, with ever-burgeoning demands for millions and billions for research and cure, note the obliteration of any scrutiny into the sexual practices that cause the transmission of the disease in the first place.
The 14th International AIDS Conference began in Barcelona on Sunday July 7, with a goal of refocusing world attention on a scourge that has already killed 20 million. A record 17,000 registrants poured into the sprawling conference center. "We need to make people angry again," said the event sponsor. "HIV is a threat to the survival of countries."
Surely everyone wants to see a cure. But are the horrific consequences of sexual practices that cause the majority of infections to occur in the first place something you and I should pay for? What duty do those who have control over the spread have to the people they scream at for billions in support and treatment? Is this fundamental question even permitted? Will the Gay Mafia come down on you if you ask the questions?
In the July 9 Wall Street Journal article titled "Incoming Chief of AIDS Fund Irks Activists," Global AIDS fund chief Richard Feachem enraged many activists when he voiced the message they didn´t want to hear: "misspending money may be just as damaging as not spending enough." Meachem said that the fund had more than enough money to move ahead. He is the director of the Institute for Global Health at UC San Francisco.
Now with news of the HIV-muppet to be introduced in Africa, and the media storm this disclosure prompted, is there any doubt about the existence of a Gay Mafia? Or would you rather be convinced by Kermit and Miss Piggy?
When I objected in our town to having a young active homosexual man become an assistant scoutmaster in my sons' Boy Scout troop, I was denounced (along with a LOT of other people) as a 'hater', 'bigot', 'monster', 'homophobe.' Now that they've finished using the worst words they can think of, what next? It stings to be called a 'hater', but I know perfectly well that I'm not. There's no way an active homosexual man is going to force me into letting him take my impressionable teenage sons out into the night on camping trips. And after the thousands of homosexual molestations of teenage boys in my Church by active homosexual priests, I AM homophobic. Gays can lead their own lives however they want. I just want them to get their faces out of mine and my children's.
Billions and billions of dollars, put only the very few, the very brave, can actually find the courage to utter the words: Sexual promiscuity is the cause of this, and it's not a good idea. This is the message that we should be screaming from the rooftops.
It is a badge of honor to stand up for what you believe is morally correct.
Homosexuals should NEVER have positions of authority over children whether they are pedophiles or not.
Their lifestyle is dangerous, life shortening, filthy and perverted. Period. Children do NOT need to be exposed to it because of this fact.
Common sense will NEVER be defeated by the mafia homosexuals.
Someone once refered to those who engage in homosexual sex as 'rump rangers'-a term which carries honesty as well as humor. I suggest we call the activist homosexual mafia who attempts to trample anyone who is brave enough to call um for what they are-the RRM-or Rump Ranger Mafia. It fits. It's honest. And it would bring humor into the sordid life these very un-gay ( as in unhappy) people who have made the choice to have orgasms with those of the same sex - I don't think they would object-after all- they call those who oppose them, 'haters'. What could be worse?
You're damn right.
They're looking for our kids everywhere - scouts, school, church... They're making enemies out of everyone.
I know. I'm glad.
Unfortunately, those "mush for brains" without common sense will buy into their filth and perversion. Let's pray we outnumber them.
good post, Republic.
"Purtilo's data indicated that the most promiscuous men had the lowest CD4 [type of white blood cell] counts, while the monogamous participants in the study had normal numbers of the T-helper cells.
"The finding prompted Sonnabend and Callen [doctors] to speak out to New York's gay community, warning that continued promiscuity could be lethal. New York gay playwright Larry Kramer echoed their warnings, issuing pleas for a slowdown on the sexual fast lane. All three men were rewarded with cries of outrage, denounced as "anti-gay faggots," homophobes, fearmongers, and fools." (p. 292, emphasis mine)
This was around 1981 BTW. Haven't read far enough into the book, but this same attitude is still there in 1983 and some of the gays speaking up the most about AIDS are the ones most likely frequenting bathhouses.
In opera, all the male stage directors are gay. All the male make-up and costuming people are gay (This is especially galling because the dressers who assist males with the donning of costumes are gay. You won't find any male dressers for the female performers.) At places like San Francisco Opera, every male in a creative position (conductors, directors, coaches, make-up, costume, scenery) is gay. The only straight males at SFO are in administration or box office.
A great artform is being sacrificed on the altar of perversion. Opera fans should boycott attending modern opera performances and stick to listening to the Golden Age singers of yesteryear when sexual preference wasn't the main criterion for an artistic career.
Another poster came up with this term, "gay-stapo". I don't use it much because I call them homosexuals. Gay is too nice of a word to be associated with rump rangers.
We brought our kids to see 'My Fair Lady' in a local production (Millburn Playhouse) in New Jersey the other day. The play was chock full of homosexual men prancing around with each other. Goodbye, Millburn Playhouse. We never knew you.
Untouchable!? Who wants to touch them?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.