Posted on 07/19/2002 6:45:08 AM PDT by Stand Watch Listen
Now there´s a story that disappeared in a hurry. Earlier in the month, there was a two day media aneurysm over former Hollywood super-agent Michael Ovitz saying he was done in by the "Gay Mafia." If Elliot Ness were alive today, he would have little choice but to relinquish the title of his crimefighting unit, "The Untouchables" to the Gay Mafia.
There is no more powerful, media-savvy agenda, dominating print, TV and movies. The connecting adhesive that hardens its compelling influence is homosexual equivalency, intolerance of Judeo-Christian values and the concept of judgment. They advance on a moral relativism that argues that G-d, faith and all expressions of religiosity, be discredited, diminished and otherwise forsaken. Those who disagree are closed-minded, ignorant, and "outside of the mainstream," whatever that means.
What is the Gay Mafia and how is it defined? It is the systematic projection and defense of a position on homosexual conduct. It probes the public domain for any objections, isolating and accusing all opposition as bigots and homophobes. Gay rights activists employ rhetoric, psychology, the subtle persuasion of message repetition, and the media
all the elements of modern marketing to frame the discussion on their terms.
Michael Ovitz may have been the arrogant, egomaniac talent agent as has been described, but be absolutely sure that when he said there was a Gay Mafia, he was telling the truth. When his quote and explanation for using it, appeared in more detail in a Vanity Fair interview, Hollywood power brokers convulsed with righteous indignation. Demands for retractions, revenge, promises that "he´ll never work in this town issued profusely. David Geffen was beside himself.
Strange isn´t it? Deafly silent about suicide bombers, catastrophic Wall Street criminality, and rewriting scripts to eliminate references to Islamic terrorism, give the Left in Hollywood a "gay mafia" quote from an insider, and the spin machine goes ballistic. To prove the point, Ovitz immediately issued an apology. The damage was done, but the truth in his statement gave pause for reflection on what it all means.
The Gay Mafia operates like a machine in what is called the "free press," exacts punishment when denied its ultimatum in public schools, and on a global scale, defines AIDS as the most important issue on the planet. As the next aggressive phase of front page headlines screams across the marxian print media, with ever-burgeoning demands for millions and billions for research and cure, note the obliteration of any scrutiny into the sexual practices that cause the transmission of the disease in the first place.
The 14th International AIDS Conference began in Barcelona on Sunday July 7, with a goal of refocusing world attention on a scourge that has already killed 20 million. A record 17,000 registrants poured into the sprawling conference center. "We need to make people angry again," said the event sponsor. "HIV is a threat to the survival of countries."
Surely everyone wants to see a cure. But are the horrific consequences of sexual practices that cause the majority of infections to occur in the first place something you and I should pay for? What duty do those who have control over the spread have to the people they scream at for billions in support and treatment? Is this fundamental question even permitted? Will the Gay Mafia come down on you if you ask the questions?
In the July 9 Wall Street Journal article titled "Incoming Chief of AIDS Fund Irks Activists," Global AIDS fund chief Richard Feachem enraged many activists when he voiced the message they didn´t want to hear: "misspending money may be just as damaging as not spending enough." Meachem said that the fund had more than enough money to move ahead. He is the director of the Institute for Global Health at UC San Francisco.
Now with news of the HIV-muppet to be introduced in Africa, and the media storm this disclosure prompted, is there any doubt about the existence of a Gay Mafia? Or would you rather be convinced by Kermit and Miss Piggy?
The population is trained through our media to view things in a certain way, or being regarded as a backward/rednick! Blackmailing corporations into hiring decision makers from certain population groups, blackmailing businesses into donating money to AIDS foundations, and insuring homosexuals partners......The old mafia have given rise to the gay mafia, the feminist mafia, the environmental mafia, the black activists mafia, the liberal mafia....
"... Voltaire has been given credit for declaring, "I disapprove of what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it." The homosexual movement in America is marching under a banner that might as well read, "I disapprove of what you say, and will use any means to prevent you from saying it."
There is a reason for the campaign of censorship and vilification. It is required to keep alive the lies and myths about homosexuality that have been systematically introduced into the American mind-set..."
With the attacks on the Boy Scouts, and the thousands of teenage boy molestations by homosexual priests in the Catholic Church, the wall is crumbling...
Congratulations are also in order for the Boy Scouts for recognizing the problem of adult homosexuals seeking access to sexually mature young boys, and banning homosexuals as socutmasters. The Boy Scout policies are not discrimination, but rather they are in place to protect young boys from predatory homosexual adults.
Homosexuals are the most unhappy, if falsely happy, sorry group of sexually dysfunctional people going. The word gay refers to happy. They can't have it-as far as I am concerned.
What about "homo-stapo" or "homosexstapo" ? A bit more honest but not a play I gestapo, I know.
In addition to the initial post, take note of replies #23 and #56.
Also, roles sung by females in the modern era are being taken by counter-tenors, the modern equivalent of the castrati, males who had been castrated to preserve their treble voices. Gays are dizzy with excitement over the prospect of homoerotic performances where no women appear at all. In fact, this has already happened at some opera companies.
It has become stomach-turning to witness such modern performances and I am forced to choose shrewdly to avoid paying for a ticket that I later regret.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.