Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 07/02/2002 6:35:02 AM PDT by Pokey78
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-22 next last
To: Pokey78
This ban is an affront to the homeless and will be struck down by the local judiciary in short order.
2 posted on 07/02/2002 6:39:00 AM PDT by PBRSTREETGANG
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Pokey78
JCDecaux public toilets...

These babies are EXTREMELY expensive. I'm amazed they shelled out for one, much less 25.

3 posted on 07/02/2002 6:39:41 AM PDT by Timesink
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Pokey78
This is just discrimination against the publicly incontinent!
4 posted on 07/02/2002 6:41:04 AM PDT by abishai
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Pokey78
Only in a place like San Francisco would this even be a subject for debate.
5 posted on 07/02/2002 6:41:15 AM PDT by wimpycat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Pokey78
The fact this wasn't already illegal speaks volumes about the state of San Fransisco.
6 posted on 07/02/2002 6:42:47 AM PDT by ContentiousObjector
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Pokey78
Violators could be fined $50 to $500.

As George Carlin once said, "Vommiting is free!"
7 posted on 07/02/2002 6:43:31 AM PDT by BikerNYC
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Pokey78
Ok, I have a question:

If a homeless person is on the street, and "has to go" and goes, how the he|| is he/she going to have money to pay the $50 to $500 fine? A homeless person probably has to "go" at least a few times a day. If a homeless person is walking around with an extra daily $600-700 to pay fines for peeing, etc., would they not be able to rent a home, thus no longer be homeless, thus not need to pee on the curb?

Oh, this is a liberal Board of Supervisors. Nevermind. [Slapping self for use of logic.]
8 posted on 07/02/2002 6:44:59 AM PDT by TomGuy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Pokey78
Gotta go, gotta go, gotta go right now,
Gotta go, gotta go, gotta go!
9 posted on 07/02/2002 6:46:02 AM PDT by Petronski
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Pokey78
I imagine that if a homeless person is fined, he or she will have to panhandle to pay the fine.

On the other hand the city could wind up with the cleanest windshields in the country.

10 posted on 07/02/2002 6:47:38 AM PDT by Focault's Pendulum
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Pokey78
San Francisco: The Paris of the United States.
11 posted on 07/02/2002 6:51:42 AM PDT by Paul Atreides
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Pokey78
I had heard San Francisco described as a sewer before, but I had no idea it was in a literal sense.
13 posted on 07/02/2002 6:57:33 AM PDT by maximus@Nashville
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Pokey78
"(A law) demonstrates we live in a civilized society," said Supervisor Tony Hall, who wrote the proposal in January when he discovered that San Francisco had no such ban.

And the rest of America issues a rather unenthusiastic golf clap for San Francisco. Welcome to 12th century...only 9 more to go...

14 posted on 07/02/2002 6:58:27 AM PDT by Chesterton
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Pokey78
What? No Incentive ? - Maybe we need to issue plastic gallon jugs to these folks and pay 'em by the gallon for using the jugs.
20 posted on 07/02/2002 7:26:54 AM PDT by NormsRevenge
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Pokey78
I thought I had it rough! I (seriously) am trying to talk my husband into agreeing to sell our house and move because, among other things, our neighbour spits off his porch.

I don't know what I'd think, do or say if I went out and saw him taking a 'krap' over the railing... !...!...*LOL*

21 posted on 07/02/2002 7:28:09 AM PDT by Minutes
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Pokey78
I used to live there. Left in the late '80's. Today its a completely different city. The streets reek of rancid, acidic urine. The 'homeless' are straight out of BladeRunner. Thanks WILLIE !!...you lying prick.
27 posted on 07/02/2002 8:03:37 AM PDT by Khurkris
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Pokey78
I'm sure that a few of Ozzy's defenders will oppose this measure...
30 posted on 07/02/2002 9:11:19 AM PDT by weegee
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Pokey78

Stop me!

...the complaints flooding in ...

"Could this get stretched ...

...after studing the ...

Daly agreed in the end...

31 posted on 07/02/2002 10:05:02 AM PDT by Elsie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Pokey78
Wait until the 9th circuit court of appeals hears this. They will overturn it so fast it will make your head spin. They will rule it is unfair to the homeless.
32 posted on 07/02/2002 10:28:58 AM PDT by Uncle Hal
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Pokey78
This is terribly insennnnnnsetive to the bums of the bay area!
33 posted on 07/02/2002 10:44:26 AM PDT by gwynapnudd
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Pokey78
Prime Time Bump!
35 posted on 07/02/2002 7:16:55 PM PDT by ContentiousObjector
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-22 next last

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson