[TomGuy]

Ok, I have a question:

If a homeless person is on the street, and "has to go" and goes, how the he|| is he/she going to have money to pay the $50 to $500 fine? A homeless person probably has to "go" at least a few times a day. If a homeless person is walking around with an extra daily $600-700 to pay fines for peeing, etc., would they not be able to rent a home, thus no longer be homeless, thus not need to pee on the curb?

Oh, this is a liberal Board of Supervisors. Nevermind. [Slapping self for use of logic.]

[Tennessee_Bob]

How will they get the money to pay the fine? Well, heck, they've got two kidneys....

[Cultural Jihad]

If a homeless person is walking around with an extra daily $600-700 to pay fines for peeing, etc., would they not be able to rent a home, thus no longer be homeless, thus not need to pee on the curb?

Many of the aggressive panhandlers are indeed richer than you or I. You'd be surprised how many homeless say: "It's not so bad being homeless. At least I don't have to work for a living as the fools do!"

[Khepera]

This will allow them to be put into jail and no longer be homeless. It's brilliant.