Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Justice Thomas Slams Liberals in Voucher Opinion
Cornell Law Review ^ | 6/27/02 | Justice Clarence Thomas

Posted on 06/27/2002 11:38:41 AM PDT by frmrda

Here is a portion of Justice Thomas' opinion in teh voucher case that will have liberals blowing a gasket:

While the romanticized ideal of universal public education resonates with the cognoscenti who oppose vouchers, poor urban families just want the best education for their children, who will certainly need it to function in our high-tech and advanced society. As Thomas Sowell noted 30 years ago: “Most black people have faced too many grim, concrete problems to be romantics. They want and need certain tangible results, which can be achieved only by developing certain specific abilities.” Black Education: Myths and Tragedies 228 (1972). The same is true today. An individual’s life prospects increase dramatically with each successfully completed phase of education. For instance, a black high school dropout earns just over $13,500, but with a high school degree the average income is almost $21,000. Blacks with a bachelor’s degree have an average annual income of about $37,500, and $75,500 with a professional degree. See U.S. Dept. of Commerce, Bureau of Census, Statistical Abstract of the United States 140 (2001) (Table 218). Staying in school and earning a degree generates real and tangible financial benefits, whereas failure to obtain even a high school degree essentially relegates students to a life of poverty and, all too often, of crime.8 The failure to provide education to poor urban children perpetuates a vicious cycle of poverty, dependence, criminality, and alienation that continues for the remainder of their lives. If society cannot end racial discrimination, at least it can arm minorities with the education to defend themselves from some of discrimination’s effects


TOPICS: Front Page News; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: justicethomas; plantationliberals; scotus; scotuslist; supremecourt; thomassowell
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-77 next last
To: The Vast Right Wing
He's certainly one of mine.
21 posted on 06/27/2002 11:59:32 AM PDT by Eric in the Ozarks
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: frmrda
GMTA

I sent that exact passage to my favorite liberal, along with pointing out that the POOREST justices [Thomas and Scalia] voted to help poor kids, while the RICHEST [Breyer and Ginsburg] voted to hurt poor kids, by keeping them trapped in failing schools.

22 posted on 06/27/2002 12:00:17 PM PDT by NativeNewYorker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: The Vast Right Wing
Why this man is not a hero to blacks in America is a mystery to me.

Y'know, he could very well be a hero to them, but the press would never report it.

23 posted on 06/27/2002 12:01:24 PM PDT by NativeNewYorker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: frmrda
The failure to provide education to poor urban children perpetuates a vicious cycle of poverty, dependence, criminality, and alienation

...and many, many nanny-state liberal Democrat constituents. That's what it's all about, keeping the poor ranks dependant on government handouts.

24 posted on 06/27/2002 12:01:46 PM PDT by ElkGroveDan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: frmrda
I would agree but all that credit gets eaten up b/c King George the first also appointed David Souter.

He certainly screwed that one up.

25 posted on 06/27/2002 12:02:40 PM PDT by Hacksaw
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: onedoug
and his nibbling around the edges of the "poverty causes crime" bit.

That's not what he said. He said that lack of education leads to both.

26 posted on 06/27/2002 12:03:47 PM PDT by lepton
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: mhking
Bump for Mr. Justice Thomas and the good Dr. Sowell!

BTTT

27 posted on 06/27/2002 12:05:50 PM PDT by Gumlegs
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: mhking
I'm convinced he'll become chief justice before his tenure ends

I heard him give a speach to some kids in a bootcamp a couple of years ago on C-SPAN... very moving and inspirational, truly one of the greats!

I just hope his wife didnt take julianne malveux's advice about feeding him a high fat diet (encouraging assination by clogged arteries?).

28 posted on 06/27/2002 12:09:18 PM PDT by operation clinton cleanup
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: frmrda
To compel a man to furnish contributions of money for the propagation of opinions which he disbelieves is sinful and tyrannical. -- Thomas Jefferson


29 posted on 06/27/2002 12:10:37 PM PDT by ppaul
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: frmrda
Wonderful post. God Bless Justice Thomas and d*mn race baiting and poverty pimping....
30 posted on 06/27/2002 12:12:34 PM PDT by eureka!
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Comment #31 Removed by Moderator

To: Hacksaw
Whatever my fellow Freepers may think of King George the 1st, we should give him respect for appointing Clarence Thomas.

When George I nominated Thomas, I thought, "Wow, he's black and grew up poor, the only way the liberals can oppose him is with someone who is black, grew up poor, and female." Sure enough . . . .

32 posted on 06/27/2002 12:18:06 PM PDT by JoeSchem
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: frmrda
Thomas is brilliant: Whatever the textual and historical merits of incorporating the Establishment Clause, I can accept that the Fourteenth Amendment protects religious liberty rights. But I cannot accept its use to oppose neutral programs of school choice through the incorporation of the Establishment Clause. There would be a tragic irony in converting the Fourteenth Amendment’s guarantee of individual liberty into a prohibition on the exercise of educational choice.

That's it in a nutshell -- to exclude certain choices on Establishment grounds represents an establishment in its own right: "you can use this anywhere except at a religious school."

33 posted on 06/27/2002 12:20:36 PM PDT by r9etb
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: frmrda
If society cannot end racial discrimination, at least it can arm minorities with the education to defend themselves from some of discrimination’s effects

Powerful sentence. Bigotry and prejudice are a part of the human condition. We seek "our own" in order to belong. The stronger members of society may give special favors to disadvantaged groups, but often these advantages are mere crumbs, designed to keep the disadvantaged in a permanant dependent state.

One needs only to look at the welfare program or the call for reparations. A promise of something for nothing only perpetuates ignorance and poverty.

The goal is not to make up for past mistakes by tipping the power balance in favor of minorities, but to provide an opportunity for equal footing in the world today.

Armed with an education, minorities can rise above the crumbs. This country is strong because we always believed anything was possible. Capitalism works because anyone can succeed. Armed with an education, minorities have as much of a chance to succeed as anyone.

34 posted on 06/27/2002 12:21:35 PM PDT by Protect the Bill of Rights
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: frmrda
If society cannot end racial discrimination, at least it can arm minorities with the education to defend themselves from some of discrimination’s effects.

God Bless Justice Thomas!

This is also reminds me of President's Bush's comment about the 'soft bigotry' of system which keeps poor children in a failing school.

35 posted on 06/27/2002 12:25:46 PM PDT by JulieRNR21
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: B-Chan
Ping.

Read Thomas's full opinion to see a him fill out the details of your Modest Proposal of yesterday.

36 posted on 06/27/2002 12:27:03 PM PDT by r9etb
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: frmrda
It is, you have to read the whole opinion. Also, he joined Rehnquist's majority opinion, which discusses in great detail why this system does not violate the Establishment Clause.

Did the decision just come down? Vouchers won?!

37 posted on 06/27/2002 12:29:54 PM PDT by Aquinasfan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Hacksaw
And he admits he made a huge mistake on Souter! He should never have listend to the former Senator Warren Rudman from VT (?) who joined the mccain campaign as another slap in the face to the Bush Family AFTER he gave us Souter.
38 posted on 06/27/2002 12:30:42 PM PDT by PhiKapMom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: *SCOTUS_List
*Index Bump
39 posted on 06/27/2002 12:32:41 PM PDT by Fish out of Water
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: r9etb
It is, of course. I would presume it's based on the idea that powers not granted to the federal government (like education) are granted to the states. Further, it's based on the idea, one would guess, that there's been no infringement of the first amendment. Am eager to read his opinion in full.
40 posted on 06/27/2002 12:35:23 PM PDT by yendu bwam
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-77 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson