Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Bar owners may get jail time for allowing smoking
The Record.com ^ | June 18, 2002 | JEFF OUTHIT

Posted on 06/18/2002 12:12:08 PM PDT by SheLion

WATERLOO REGION -- Stubborn bar owners may face jail for letting their customers smoke in Waterloo Region. Health staff have proposed asking justices of the peace for orders prohibiting convicted owners from breaking the smoking bylaw.

Owners could then be jailed for contempt of court if they breach the order and permit smoking.

It's thought the jail threat may be what's needed to dissuade 28 hard core premises that continue to flout the smoking ban after two years.

"What we are doing is stepping up the process basically to the maximum," said Brian Hatton, the region's director of environmental health.

"What we want is compliance. We don't want anybody to go to jail."

Alternatively, the region could seek Superior Court injunctions compelling owners to obey the no-smoking bylaw, an approach being tried in Ottawa with six proprietors.

The injunction approach could result in an order to close down a bar, or a jail sentence for its owner.

Both approaches could see bar owners face fines exceeding the current maximum of $5,000 for violating the smoking bylaw.

But some think jailing offenders is going too far, even though they want better enforcement.

Coun. Jane Brewer of Cambridge said she's "not convinced it's one of those things" that requires a jail sentence.

"I think there are other remedies that need to be looked at before we get to that," Brewer said.

The jail threat seems like overkill to Paul Weber, a Maryhill tavern owner who contends he's losing business to bars that flout the smoking ban.

"I think it's a little bit much," Weber said.

"You don't go to jail for beating people up in the park any more, so I don't know why you should go to jail for not enforcing the smoking bylaw?"

The jail threat is part of a proposed enforcement crackdown aimed at 28 stubborn establishments.

Councillors have also been advised to reassign six public health inspectors to help police the ban.

They would target the holdout establishments with repeated plainclothes visits.

As well, it's proposed the region stop giving bar owners three warnings in advance of charges.

Health staff say the crackdown, to be considered by councillors today, addresses complaints that a few establishments are stealing business away from 99 per cent of the industry that complies with the ban.

It comes a week after council tightened its bylaw by banning smoking at private functions like weddings and corporate events.

The next step for future debate, health staff say, is for council to reconsider smoking in taxis, workplaces, and private clubs like Royal Canadian Legion halls.

Unlike other communities, Waterloo Region exempted these places from its smoking ban.

Health staff now contend that some private clubs are admitting members of the public to smoke.

Also, extending the ban to these places would meet the region's goals by protecting employees and others from second-hand smoke.

Extra enforcement would come by reassigning six of 26 public health inspectors away from duties like food inspection and infection control, on a part-time basis.

The smoking ban is enforced by two bylaw officers. But their effectiveness is limited because they are widely recognized by owners.

In the meantime, it's also proposed that the region:

Continue educating the public about the dangers of smoking.

Consider new ways to conduct anti-smoking investigations.

Ask courts to impose big fines against repeat offenders.

Publicize the names of convicted owners in reports to council, as is done with food-safety violations.

Continue to advise the province's liquor licensing agency of establishments that violate the bylaw, to put their liquor licence at risk.

SMOKING INFRACTIONS

Today, people can be fined but not jailed for illegal smoking in enclosed public places.

€ 898 individuals have been convicted of illegal smoking. Most have faced fines reaching $255.

€ 19 proprietors have been convicted of permitting smoking. The highest fine has been $3,000. Most fines have been $1,000 or more.


TOPICS: Activism/Chapters; Canada; Culture/Society; Editorial; Government
KEYWORDS: antismokers; butts; cigarettes; individualliberty; niconazis; prohibitionists; pufflist; smokingbans; tobacco
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 121-132 next last
To: tomakaze
It's the kind of crap you expect to run into in socialist Europe

Even the Europeans smoke a lot, and for the most part, anywhere they like.

A little travel will open your eyes to just how 'free' we really are.

21 posted on 06/18/2002 12:32:21 PM PDT by freeeee
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: SheLion
These are municipal politicians. I once knew one that had an original idea. He fainted!
22 posted on 06/18/2002 12:32:49 PM PDT by Snowyman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: bloodmeridian
Looks like bars will be closing up quickly in the Waterloo Region.

Too sad. Life's work down the drain. It makes me sick.

23 posted on 06/18/2002 12:33:26 PM PDT by SheLion
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: SheLion
RE:The jail threat is part of a proposed enforcement crackdown aimed at 28 stubborn establishments.
 
i.e. those owners who wont bend their knees to this absurdity.
24 posted on 06/18/2002 12:33:30 PM PDT by tomakaze
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SheLion
ned, why do you say this?!

I just think that tobacco smoking is going to go the way of poodle skirts. But smokers are good and decent folks and I would like to see the transition from smoking be as gentle and as peaceful as possible.

25 posted on 06/18/2002 12:35:08 PM PDT by ned
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: SheLion
I just returned from a meeting with a bar owner over the Delaware smoking ban -

They have a banner hanging on the outside of the establishment that states they are smoking in there now and will be come november (when it goes into effect)

I'm going back there tomorrow with the didgital camera to take a picture and post it all over the internet.

Now I'm off to talk with another owner (sheesh, people are going to start thinking I'm some kind of barfly or something!!!)

26 posted on 06/18/2002 12:35:58 PM PDT by Gabz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: tomakaze
Gawd, sometimes I just flat hate people

hell, i hate nazi bastards like that all the time.

the south was right.

too bad lincoln didn't get capped in '61.

27 posted on 06/18/2002 12:36:17 PM PDT by tomkat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: steve50
Have these idiots ever thought of just hanging a sign on the front door, designating the bar as either smoking permitted or non smoking, and letting the consumer make his choice which he wishes to support.

Sounds like they might fruitfully adopt the private club concept, wherein an establishment is no longer public and imposes a nominal annual membership fee (e.g. $5 US, which can be discounted from an initial cover charge, where applicable). The private clubs can allow smoking or not. Membership rules for smoking clubs can specify clearly that patrons must respect the smoking rights of other patrons, and waive claims to damages and other infringements on such rights. If customers choose to become members of non-smoking clubs, or choose to patronize public establishments, that is their prerogative.

28 posted on 06/18/2002 12:36:22 PM PDT by captain11
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: freeeee
Exactly. My summer in England taught me that. Fatty foods, smokers, and a pub on every corner. A nanny-statists worst nightmare.
29 posted on 06/18/2002 12:37:28 PM PDT by Bella_Bru
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: ned
I would like to see the transition from smoking be as gentle and as peaceful as possible.

I don't think you will ever see it gentle and peaceful, ned!

What are you going to do with us die hard Conservatives who are fighting for our rights? Answer me that one.

What are you going to do with we Americans who refuse to go "down under" just because the nazi few say it's going to happen? Please answer me on this.

30 posted on 06/18/2002 12:40:53 PM PDT by SheLion
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: SheLion
SheLion, I used to post this every week in the Smoker's Lounge:

Smoker's Creed

I smoke because I like to smoke.
I smoke because I want to smoke.
Smoking pleases me.
My life is better because I smoke.
I accept responsibility for all of my actions.
I want the freedom to choose to smoke.
I can choose how to make myself happy.
I own myself.
Smoking is my choice.

31 posted on 06/18/2002 12:40:53 PM PDT by Bella_Bru
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Gabz
Good luck, Gabz!

Your going to wear yourself out! I'm proud of you!!!

32 posted on 06/18/2002 12:41:53 PM PDT by SheLion
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: ned
I would like to see the transition from smoking be as gentle and as peaceful as possible.

And whose decision will it be for us to transition?? Certainly not the government's, but some folks seem to be pushing hard for that.

33 posted on 06/18/2002 12:42:49 PM PDT by Bella_Bru
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: Bella_Bru
I love that! I saved it for myself.

Thank you SO much, Bella!

34 posted on 06/18/2002 12:43:58 PM PDT by SheLion
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: steve50
Have these idiots ever thought of just hanging a sign on the front door, designating the bar as either smoking permitted or non smoking, and letting the consumer make his choice which he wishes to support.

ROFLMAO! You just tied two ideas together that the socialists and nico nazis hate. Capitalism and freedom.

35 posted on 06/18/2002 12:44:18 PM PDT by Bella_Bru
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Bella_Bru
I was in an English pub when a German Shepherd (and his owner) came in for a pint.

The dog poked his nose over the bar, politely barked, and got served two icecubes.

The weenies around here would suffer a panick attack if they ever saw such a thing.

36 posted on 06/18/2002 12:44:57 PM PDT by freeeee
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: tomakaze
It's the kind of crap you expect to run into in socialist Europe or Kalifornia.

To echo freeee's reply to you, they smoke like chimneys in many Euro countries. Also, Kalifornia is at least two states. There is the ultra-PC Bay Area + Hollyweird axis, and then there's the rest of the state. FR is based in the rest of the state.

37 posted on 06/18/2002 12:46:17 PM PDT by captain11
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: SheLion
I really despise the morons that imply smokers smoke out of need and not desire. There is nothing I like better after a hearty meal than a strong cup of coffee and a nice smoke. The only time I 'need' a smoke is to blow it in the face of the smug truth.com-esque nico nazis.
38 posted on 06/18/2002 12:46:37 PM PDT by Bella_Bru
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: SheLion
Time to "Lock and load".
39 posted on 06/18/2002 12:46:49 PM PDT by BARGE
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SheLion
bttt
40 posted on 06/18/2002 12:46:49 PM PDT by lodwick
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 121-132 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson