CHANDRA KILLING NOT A RANDOM ATTACK: D.C. DETECTIVES

NY Post ^ | May 26, 2002 | NILES LATHEM and ANDY GELLER

[stlnative]

May 26, 2002 -- Investigators believe Chandra Levy was lured to her death by someone she knew or slain by a predator who methodically stalked her, police sources said yesterday.

Evidence collected at the spot where her remains were found points away from her being killed in a random attack while she was jogging, the sources said.

[rvoitier]

He's got to be hiding something. I mean, he's a politician, after all.

[Spunky]

"find the watch, and you have found the killer!"

You know my husband has all kinds of watch boxes in his
dresser and no watches to go with them. So for Condit to
go to all the trouble he did to get rid of a watch box sure
does make it much more suspicious. Condit must
have been thinking: Oh my G-d! I've lost my watch. It must
have come off when I was struggling with Chandra. If by
chance the body is ever found and the watch with it,
this watch box can point right to me. Other than that
kind of thinking there would be no reason to have
done what he did with the watch box.

[jwalburg]

After reading Ann Rule books and seeing how psychopaths think and manipulate people, I believe you.

[RightOnline]

Gee. Golly. Wow. Slap my forehead.

So far, all the D.C. police have managed to do is to first avoid..........then clumsily state...........the bloody obvious.

D.C. cops are to law enforcement what D.C. city government is to city government.

[hoosiermama]

The information about meeting him without any id etc, was given by his former girl friendS. He had a bicyle in his office that he used to take breaks and ride though the park for relaxation. That information was released by his office or was public knowledge.

[hoosiermama]

I'm not familiar with Ann Rule books. More information please. Novels? Mysteries? Non fiction?

[Spunky]

If they dug up David Brock's medical records,

Are you sure they actually read his medical records or just found out
he was hospitalized for a mental breakdown?

[ET(end tyranny)]

You could be right. Be interesting to be a mouse in the corner watching the going's on at their house.

[Spunky]

(the lack of the victim's own fingerprints)

Are you saying that they didn't even find Chandra's fingerprints in her apartment or just on the keyboard?
I must have missed some of the information because I don't remember this.

[ET(end tyranny)]

I'd like to find some of those early reports from last year on this. I recall some comment the apartment ws clean and didn't enven yield much in the way of fingerprints, even Chandra's. And I do recall some comment about the computer keyboard.

[Pegita]

Thanks for adding to the pager info, Spunky. I've been working my way toward that bridge that's going over to the 21st century, but I haven't arrived yet.

[cake_crumb]

"I was married to an controlling husband who told me, what to think, wear, say, do. I've got a 140+ Iq, but was unable to resist the control"

Me too. I was not imagining it when he tampered with the breaks on my car because he didn't like the new, high paying jib I had just gotten in VA, and I was definitelt not imagining him following me, or sitting on the neighbor's property across from the house where I now live.

Women with high IQ's (I learned later when studying the phenomenon) are typical victims of long term control situations. The books and publshed papers that I read never said so in so many words (of course I haven't read them all) but I can explain the phenomenon in one sentence:

"Sometimes, a rational, orderd mind is NOT our friend."

Once we get PAST that relization, an ordered and rational mind is exactly what is needed in order to have a CHANCE at beating the controller at their own game.

[cake_crumb]

...my typing is WORSE than usual...please ignore the numerous typos.

[Eva]

I guess that makes sense, that a mugger would tie up a victim, but he wouldn't drag him a half mile off the trail. I think a quick get away would be more likely.

[hoosiermama]

Did a google on Chandra and finerprints. Found nothing on that but did find:
Condit did not have a car in DC. The reason he used bicyle or hitched a ride with employee.
and this posted July 2001.
Of all the possibilities (in descending order of likelyhood), it is more likely that
1) Chandra fell victim to a street crime while jogging in Rock Creek Park,
2)was a victim of a sociopath with more free time than the Congressman,
3) committed suicide,
4)stumbled while jogging, fell into a ravine, cracked her head and died; or
5)for whatever reason is off alive somewhere.

Well, we can cross out 5 but four is very interesting! As dense as the woods is there, she might have fallen a few feet, but NOT a 100 yards!

[hoosiermama]

YELP! That's it! Want to go into business together...We could write a self help book. With you typos and my spelling we'd get along fine. LOL
It also has to do with them targeting "powerful" people in order to feel more powerful.

[dogbyte12]

Condit did not have a car in DC.

Condit did have a car in DC. He had a Red Ford Escort leased to his staff. He had a set of keys. He didn't like driving himself, so he had the staff do that, but he did use the car for dates with Anne Marie Smith.

It's a red herring though. Chandra wasn't killed in a car.

[ET(end tyranny)]

I think you can also scratch off #3! Falling and hitting one's head is common, but it doesn't generally cause your legging to knot up. Interesting list though. Wish I had all the early threads. Didn't transfer them when I switched to a new browser. *sigh*

[ET(end tyranny)]

Perhaps the Condit proxy met her at the curb, hence the screams in from of the building???