Skip to comments.
BIN LADEN-GATE WITNESS DARES DEMS: "DEPOSE ME ON CLINTON 9-11 COVER-UP"
NewsMax (1:38 pm EDT) ^
| 5/17/02
| NewsMax
Posted on 05/17/2002 12:50:42 PM PDT by Elkiejg
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 101-120 next last
This guy is going to be on FoxNews (Hannity's show) tonight - should be watched. I've heard him before and HE KNOWS WHAT HE'S TALKING ABOUT!!
1
posted on
05/17/2002 12:50:44 PM PDT
by
Elkiejg
To: Elkiejg
Mansoor is of Pakistani descent. I have seen him quite a few times last fall on CNN. He definately knows what he is talking about.
To: Elkiejg
A bit of backround: Ijaz still identifies himself as a Democrat. As far as I know, he still donates money to the Party. This isn't a conservative engaging in a partisan attack. He's one of their's coming clean.
3
posted on
05/17/2002 12:54:53 PM PDT
by
Redcloak
To: Elkiejg
Mansoor Ijaz
To: Elkiejg
Be careful! HE's slippery and slimy. He's the one who setup Daniel Pearl's appointments in Pakistan. He's in a self-serving, CYA mode. He knows that former government employees/appointees would never come out the way he's challenging them. Methinks he's protesting a little too loudly. I bet Sean did NOT ask him about his knowledge of the Danny Pearl case.
To: Elkiejg
bump
6
posted on
05/17/2002 12:58:15 PM PDT
by
timestax
To: BrooklynGOP
Agree. He's been on many talk shows and seems very credible.
To: Elkiejg
Mansoor better hide his cat, stay out of airplanes, and avoid jogging in secluded areas.
8
posted on
05/17/2002 12:58:34 PM PDT
by
Henchster
To: Elkiejg
Mansoor is highly intelligent, well-informed and thoroughly credible. Let's see if the other spin -- I mean "news" -- networks invite him on. Yeah right!
9
posted on
05/17/2002 12:58:53 PM PDT
by
inkling
To: Redcloak; psyops; Colorado Tanker; Libertina; pissed off janitor; happygrl;Dennisw;sjackson...
Bump, Ping!!!
To: Elkiejg
Ijaz also charged that Clinton officials deliberately went out of their way to stifle FBI anti-terrorism probes.Clinton didn't want to make waves among the Arabs. If he alienated the Arabs he would lose his chance to settle the Mid-East problem and lose his chance to win the Nobel Peace Prize.
11
posted on
05/17/2002 1:00:39 PM PDT
by
syriacus
To: Elkiejg
What does Hillary have to say about this?
12
posted on
05/17/2002 1:01:02 PM PDT
by
onedoug
To: Elkiejg;ALL
To: Elkiejg
I wonder how long he has to live.
14
posted on
05/17/2002 1:01:25 PM PDT
by
Bahbah
To: Elkiejg
There is no comparison to the Clinton administration."True on so many levels, thank god.
To: swarthyguy
Why was he shilling for Sudan? A wonderful genocidal government there.
16
posted on
05/17/2002 1:02:50 PM PDT
by
Shermy
To: sleavelessinseattle
Another dumb move by the Dims. There's a mountain of paper in the files from 1992-2000, and the Pubbies are now in charge of the files. Notice how fast the 1999 report of possible hijackings came our?
To: syriacus
NO American president since before FDR has wanted to ruffle the feathers of the perfumed princes. There's too much money involved. Both parties are up to their necks in Arab money. Why do you think we aren't taking on the Saudis? Why do we defer to them so much?
To: Elkiejg
Don't need to wait on DEMS to depose him - R's in the House can call him to testify.
To: Elkiejg
I'm pretty sure this Mansoor guy has a PhD in physics too.
20
posted on
05/17/2002 1:04:02 PM PDT
by
blam
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 101-120 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson