Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Elkiejg
Ijaz also charged that Clinton officials deliberately went out of their way to stifle FBI anti-terrorism probes.

Clinton didn't want to make waves among the Arabs. If he alienated the Arabs he would lose his chance to settle the Mid-East problem and lose his chance to win the Nobel Peace Prize.

11 posted on 05/17/2002 1:00:39 PM PDT by syriacus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: syriacus
NO American president since before FDR has wanted to ruffle the feathers of the perfumed princes. There's too much money involved. Both parties are up to their necks in Arab money. Why do you think we aren't taking on the Saudis? Why do we defer to them so much?
18 posted on 05/17/2002 1:03:26 PM PDT by swarthyguy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies ]

To: syriacus
"Clinton didn't want to make waves among the Arabs. If he alienated the Arabs he would lose his chance to settle the Mid-East problem and lose his chance to win the Nobel Peace Prize."

The pattern he set in his international dealings while in office suggest otherwise. He supported terrorists because he supports them---period. They are of the same ideological bent. They're continuing his war on America. Worldwide, thugs and two-bit dictators have benefitted from his having been in office. From the distribution of security secrets to legislative relaxation, to arming and supporting (KLA), to defanging the INS, CIA, FBI, etc...This isn't about any nobel prize.

63 posted on 05/17/2002 1:38:51 PM PDT by monkeywrench
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson