Congressman Ron Paul's TV Gaffe

By Congressman Ron Paul
The other day, I made a huge "gaffe" on national TV: I told the truth about the crimes of the U.S. government. As you can imagine, the ceiling fell in, and a couple of walls too. Congressman are supposed to support the government, I was told. Oh, it's okay to criticize around the edges, but there are certain subjects a member of the House of Representatives is not supposed to bring up. But I touched the real "third-rail" of American politics, and the sparks sure flew.

I was interviewed on C-SPAN's morning "Washington Journal," and I used the opportunity, as I do all such media appearances, to point out how many of our liberties have been stolen by the federal government. We must take them back. The Constitution, after all, has a very limited role for Washington, D.C.

If we stuck to the Constitution as written, we would have: no federal meddling in our schools; no Federal Reserve; no U.S. membership in the UN; no gun control; and no foreign aid. We would have no welfare for big corporations, or the "poor"; no American troops in 100 foreign countries; no Nafta, Gatt, or "fast-track"; no arrogant federal judges usurping states rights; no attacks on private property; and no income tax. We could get rid of most of the cabinet departments, most of the agencies, and most of the budget. The government would be small, frugal, and limited.

That system is called liberty. It's what the Founding Fathers gave us. Under liberty, we built the greatest, freest, most prosperous, most decent country on earth. It's no coincidence that the monstrous growth of the federal government has been accompanied by a sickening decline in living standards and moral standards. The feds want us to be hamsters on a treadmill--working hard, all day long, to pay high taxes, but otherwise entirely docile and controlled. The huge, expensive, and out-of-control leviathan that we call the federal government wants to run every single aspect of our lives.

Well, I'm sorry, but that's not America. It's not what the Founders gave us. It's not the country you believe in. It's not the country I believe in. So, on that TV interview, I emphasized not only the attacks on our property, but also the decline of our civil liberties, at the hands of the federal police. There are not supposed to be any federal police, according to the Constitution.

Then I really went over the line. I talked about the Waco massacre. Bill Clinton and Janet Reno claim those 81 church members, including 19 children, burned down their own church and killed themselves, and good riddance. So they put few survivors on trial, and threw them in prison for 40 years.

We're not supposed to remember that the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, and Firearms--talk about an unconstitutional agency--rather than arrest David Koresh on his regular morning jog, called in the TV stations for big publicity bonanza, and sent a swat team in black masks and black uniforms to break down his front door, guns blazing. They also sent in a helicopter gunship, to shoot at the roof of a church full of innocents.

The Branch Davidians resisted, and after a heartless siege of almost two months, and after cutting off food, water, and electricity, and playing horrible rock and roll through huge speakers 24 hours a day, the feds sent in the tanks to crush the walls of the church, and inject poisonous CS gas. Now, CS gas is banned under the Paris Convention on Chemical Warfare. The U.S. could not use it in a war. But it could and did use it against American civilians.

After the tanks did their work on the church, the place burst into flame, and all 81 people--men, women, children, and babies - were incinerated in a screaming horror. Did some feds set the fire? Did the flammable CS gas ignite, since without electricity, the parishioners were using lanterns? Did a tank knock over a lantern, striking one of the bales of hay being used against the thin walls as a "defense" against bullets? Or did the Davidians, as Clinton and Reno claim, kill themselves?

A new documentary- -Waco: The Rules of Engagement- may show, through FLIR infrared photography, FBI snipers killing the Davidians by shooting through the back of the church, where no media cameras were allowed. This film won a prize at the famed Sundance Film Festival. It was made by people who took the government's side, until they investigated.

Whatever the truth, there's no question that an irresponsible federal government has innocent blood on its hands, and not only from Waco. And the refusal of corrupt and perverse liberals to admit it means nothing.

In my r~interview, in answer to a caller's question, I pointed out that Waco, and the federal murders at Ruby Ridge- especially the FBI sniper's shot that blasted apart the head of a young mother holding her baby- caused many Americans to live in fear of federal power. Then I uttered the sentiment that caused the media hysteria: I said that a lot of Americans fear that they too might be attacked by federal swat teams for exercising their constitutional rights, or merely for wanting to be left alone.

Whoa! You've never seen anything like it. For days, in an all-out assault, I was attacked by Democrats, unions, big business, establishment Republicans, and- of course- the media, in Washington and my home state of Texas. Newspapers foamed at the mouth, calling me a "right-wing extremist." (Say, isn't that what George III called Thomas Jefferson?)

I was even blamed for the Oklahoma City bombing! And by the way, I don't believe we've gotten the full truth on that either. All my many opponents were outraged that a Congressman would criticize big government. "If you don't like Washington, resign!" said a typical big-city newspaper editorial.

But the media, as usual, were all wet. (Do they ever get anything right?) The average Congressman may go to Washington to wallow in power, and line his pockets with a big lobbying job for a special interest (so he can keep ripping-off the taxpayers). But that's not why I'm in Congress. It's not why I left my medical practice as a physician. It's not why I put up with all the abuse. It's not why I refuse a plush Congressional pension.

I'm in this fight for a reason. I want to hand on to my children and grandchildren, and to you and your family, a great and free America, an America true to her Constitution, an America worthy of her history. I will not let the crooks and clowns and criminals have their way. I'm in Congress to represent the ideas of liberty, the ideas that you and I share, for the people of my district, for the people of Texas, for the people of America. That's why I'm working to stop federal abuses, and to cut the government: its taxes, its bureaucrats, its paramilitary police, its spending, its meddling overseas, and every single unconstitutional action it takes. And not with a pair of nail scissors, but with a hammer and chisel. Won't you help me do this work?

Not much of the federal leviathan would be left, if I had my way. But you'd be able to keep the money you earn, your privacy would be secure, your dollar would be sound, your local school would be tops, and your kids wouldn't be sent off to some useless or vicious foreign war to fight for the UN. But Jefferson and the other Founders would recognize our government, and our descendants would bless us. By the way, when I say cut taxes, I don't mean fiddle with the code. I mean abolish the income tax and the IRS, and replace them with nothing.

Recently, I asked a famous Republican committee chairman-who's always talking about getting rid of IRS- why he engineered a secret $580 million raise for the tax collectors. "They need it for their computers," this guy told me. So the IRS can't extract enough from us as it is! The National Taxpayers Union says I have the highest pro-taxpayer rating in Congressional history, that I am the top "Taxpayer's Best Friend." You know I won't play the Capitol Hill games with the Capitol Hill gang, denouncing the IRS while giving the Gestapo more of your money. Or figuring out some other federal tax for them to squeeze out of you. I also want to abolish the Federal Reserve, and send Alan Greenspan out to get a job.

The value of our dollar and the level of our interest rates are not supposed to be manipulated by a few members of the power elite meeting secretly in a marble palace. The Federal Reserve is unconstitutional, pure and simple. The only Constitutional money is gold and silver, not notes redeemable in them. Not fed funny money. Without the Federal Reserve, our money could not be inflated at the behest of big government or big banks. Your income and savings would not lose their value. Just as important, we wouldn't have this endless string of booms and busts, recessions and depressions, with each bust getting worse. They aren't natural to the free market; they're caused by the schemers at the Fed. President Andrew Jackson called the 19th-century Fed "The Monster" because it was a vehicle for inflation and all sorts of special-interest corruption. Let me tell you, things haven't changed a bit. I also work to save our schools from D.C. interference. Thanks to the feds, new curriculums not only smear the Founders as "racist, slave-owning elitists," they seek to dumb down our students so they will all be equal. "Look-say" reading and the abolition of phonics has the same purpose, and so does the new "fuzzy" math, in which there are no right and no wrong answers. That must be what they use in the U.S. Treasury! It's certainly what they use in the U.S. Congress.

But ever since the beginning of federal aid to education and accelerating with the establishment of the rotten Department of Education, SAT scores have been dropping. Schools, with few exceptions, are getting worse every year. To save our kids, we must get the sticky fingers of the feds off our local schools, and let parents rule. That's what the Constitution says, and the Bible too.

And then there's my least favorite topic, the UN. World government is obviously unconstitutional. It undermines our country's sovereignty in the worst way possible. That's why I want us out of the UN, and the UN itself taking a hike. After all, the UN is socialist and corrupt (many votes can be bought with a "blonde and a case of scotch," one UN ambassador once said). It costs many billions, and it puts our soldiers in UN uniforms under foreign commanders, and sends them off to unconstitutional, undeclared wars. When Michael New, one of the finest young men I've ever met, objected to wearing UN blue, he was kicked out of the American Army. What an outrage! Not one dime for the UN, and not one American soldier! Not in Haiti, not in Bosnia, not in Somalia, not in Rwanda. I know its radical, but how about devoting American military efforts to defending America, and only America?

Such ideas, said one newspaper reporter, make me a maverick who will never go far because he won't go along to get along. Darn right! What does "go far" mean? Get a big government job? To heck with that. And I won't sell my vote for pork either. When I walked through the U.S. Capitol this morning, I got angry. The building is filled with statues and painting of Jefferson, Madison, and the other Founders. Those great men sacrificed everything to give us a free country, and a Constitution to keep it that way. When I was first elected, I placed my hand on the Bible and swore an oath to uphold the Constitution. That's exactly what I'm fighting for. But such ideas drive the liberals crazy. That's why I badly need your help. I've been targeted nationally for defeat. The Democrats, the AFL-CIO, the teachers union, big business PACs, the trial lawyers, the big bankers, the foreign-aid lobbyists, the big media, and the establishment Republicans want to dance on my political grave. The Fed, the Education Department, and the UN are anxious to join in. They can't stand even one person telling the truth. And they're terrified when that truth gains the people's support.

***Posted by Demidog to chantal7; OrthodoxPresbyterian On News/Activism Apr 28 10:19 PM #40 of 40 ~~~ I love my congressman. When the "war on terror" began, a friend of mine here at FR, who actually has read the constitution said: Hey....why don't we ask Ron Paul to draft legislation asking the President to issue letters of Marque and Reprisal since that is the only Constitutional remedy in this situation. Great Idea. It was the next day that Ron Paul was making a speach regarding letters of Marque and Reprisal.***

Next "working" day, anyway. The article advocating the issuance of letters of Marque and Reprisal against Al-Queda hit the FR News Forum on the Friday following 9/11; Ron Paul was advocating same in his floor speeches to Congress the following Monday and Tuesday.

***Since I was in his district, I was volunteered ( :) ) to make contact. Soon thereafter (within a week) the legislation was drafted and put into the record upon which it was completely ignored by the so-called conservative Republicans in Congress and the Senate. Bush certainly wouldn't touch that stuff with a ten-foot pole since his oil buddies wouldn't make a bundle on a new "war on terror."***

Exactly right. We got 2 Bills into the Congressional Hopper within 96 hours... which were, of course, summarily ignored, but it was an emotional time and we wanted to at least *try* to do our part.

For the record, while Arm-chair Hawks continue to advocate extending the War on Terrorism to all corners of the Islamic World, the one man who actually ordered the murder of 3 or 4,000 Americans is still at large, despite all "Big Gubmint's" best efforts. Some of us would have liked to see Private resources deployed alongside Government action to bring this madman to his deserved end, but hey -- what do we know....

All that said, I admit that I am Monday-morning quarterbacking. There's no guarantee that a general issuance of Marque and Reprisal would have served to hunt down Osama better than Government forces have; it's just an (expressly constitutional) idea that *wasn't even tried*, that's all. :-(

"The people cannot just leave it up to the governments. People have now to take responsibility." -- Mariane Pearl, widow of murdered American journalist Daniel Pearl.

You both say Ron Paul should be president. His ideas and integrity sound excellent. Just one question?...is he firm on immigration and deporting illegals?

And I have a "show me the money" attitude toward non-mainstream candidates. A lot of people would donate time and money if those who are fed up had a plan to win...so often (example: Carla Howe in Massacusetts) these people run to make a point and turn the mainstream parties to their ways of thinking. It didn't work for Carla Howe, it didn't work for Alan Keyes, it didn't even work for Ralph Nadar.

Serious people with a potential to get a big following...need to get together, bury some hatchets, decide what's really important to save the principles in the Constitution and save the other stuff until common sense prevails. (Example: I'm even willing to wait on the abortion issue...we've got a conservative president now, and we have to put up with Christine Whitman in a role model position...that's not good.)

And people who want to take the country back have to stop destroying each other...example Pat Buchanan destroyed Ross Perot's political structure, which would've been an excellent structure to win the election...in fact, it's still in place. I'm not convinced Pat Buchanan wanted to win anything except publicity for his speaking and writing. And going along with the mainstream joking about Ross Perot...hey, he's the guy who actually did something about stuff, more than once in his life.

If this is a rant, sorry. But it's serious stuff. I hope you guys who want Ron Paul (or someone of his caliber and integrity) as President are sitting in a dark room somewhere plotting your strategy to win, including some strange combinations of people who have one thing in common...the need to save the nation!

It didn't work for Carla Howe, it didn't work for Alan Keyes, it didn't even work for Ralph Nadar.

Carla Howell received 12% of the vote running for Senate and that was with both a Republican and a Democrat in the race. (The Democrat was Ted Kennedy).

She has almost single handedly gotten the MA repeal the income tax initiative on the ballot.

She, along with Michael Cloud have initiated the only lawsuit which intends to strike down all campaign finance laws (see http://realcampaignreform.org/).

She isn't finished. And she's running for Governor. We'll see what happens.

She isn't finished. And she's running for Governor. We'll see what happens.

I heard Carla Howe speak once, to a small group which is known for asking tough but fair questions. She did very well...although there was one ultra liberal Democrat who "got her" (on purpose, I thought) on a question she probably should've been able to answer. (Do you think the NTSB should be abolished?...she didn't know what it was. Suggestion...have her bring an advisor with a laptop when she speaks, to find things fast)

I really, really liked her and her commitment to her ideals. And she won the crowd over. But now, with Mitt Romney running as the Republican Governor candidate, I think it will keep people voting for the Republican or Democrat, as the campaign will probably get hot. (If the Democrats are smart, they'll nominnate a Catholic..with the church mess, the Catholics in MA need someone to rally around.) I wish she were running for a vulnerable Congressional seat...the Republican Party isn't trying real hard there.

While Limbaugh HAS (I THINK!) plugged more folks into the process, he has an unfortunate (engineered??) tendency to lead them in the direction of the Pubbie Party.

As anyone with half a brain OUGHT to know, the Dems want state socialism NOW; the Pubbies are content to wait a few days. Does the expression "Judas Goat" ring any bells?

The only national personality about whom Limbaugh listeners can be certain they'll hear is -- well -- Rush Limbaugh.

I REALLY wish Rush would take more vacations so we could hear more from Walter Williams.

Ron Paul is dead-on in his assessment of how overgrown and beyond it's legal authority our centralized federal government has grown. Unfortunately, most people have been bought-off with their own (or someone else's) money. For example, older folks bristle at how senseless and overbearing our government has become, but mention how, in reigning in the behemoth, Social Security and Medicare would have to go, and their eyes glaze over and the backpedaling begins.

"Few men desire liberty; most men wish only for a just master." -- Sallust

"Faced with the pain of freedom, man begs for his shackles." -- Gerry Spence

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.