Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Salvation Army balks at domestic-partner law - seniors could suffer if city cuts funding
OurMaine ^

Posted on 04/26/2002 9:05:05 PM PDT by chance33_98

The Salvation Army's refusal to comply with Portland's domestic partnership ordinance could jeopardize the only activity center and meals-on-wheels program that serves the city's elderly.

The organization received $60,000 a year from the city to operate its $400,000 meals program and the center for seniors.

But under the year-old ordinance, organizations that get federal funding through the city must provide health and employment benefits to domestic partners of employees.

Salvation Army officials have refused to comply with the ordinance, even if it means losing the money and having to scale back or close the senior programs.

The Bible-based, Christian organization, which believes that Scripture forbids sexual relations between members of the same sex, has asked the city for an exemption.

The issue surfaced in Portland four months after the Salvation Army took a stand against a similar domestic partnership law in San Francisco.

When the Portland City Council approved its ordinance last May, it voted 6-3 to reject an amendment that would have exempted religious organizations from compliance.

Councilor Philip ''Jack'' Dawson hopes to find a way to let the Salvation Army off the hook. He emphasizes the good the organization does by delivering meals to elderly shut-ins and providing a place for other seniors to participate in various activities.

''There's got to be a way to continue having them do what they have done so well for so long,'' Dawson said. ''Hopefully, we can do that without getting into their conscience or religious beliefs.''

Among those who question the Salvation Army's refusal to provide domestic partnership benefits is Mayor Karen Geraghty.

''I think the Salvation Army should be ashamed of itself for trying to decide who should get health care and who shouldn't,'' Geraghty said. ''That decision should cross over every religious line.''

The city is reviewing the ordinance at the request of the eastern territorial leadership of the Salvation Army, which is headquartered in New York. Local Salvation Army officials sought guidance from the territorial headquarters before signing this year's contract to receive $60,000 from the city.

The city provides domestic partner benefits to its employees and the Salvation Army's contract with the city stipulates that it must follow all ordinances related to human rights.


TOPICS: Government; US: Maine
KEYWORDS:
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-40 last
To: chance33_98
The homosexuals destroy everything that they touch. What a truly pathetic group of self-centered and self-serving evil-doers.
21 posted on 05/14/2002 7:32:28 PM PDT by FormerLib
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Siobhan
They should not give in to Satan and should stick to their guns.
22 posted on 05/14/2002 7:43:14 PM PDT by Coleus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: chance33_98
''I think the Salvation Army should be ashamed of itself for trying to decide who should get health care and who shouldn't,'' Geraghty said. ''That decision should cross over every religious line.''

The Salvation Army has proved it is more than willing to help. It's the liberals who are stopping them. The liberals aren't willing to allow their Constitutional right to freedom of Religion.
Sorry, poor elderly, the liberals won't let them do it anymore unless they bow down to Satan. Sorry.
The liberals have decided who will get help, and who will not.

23 posted on 05/14/2002 7:47:16 PM PDT by concerned about politics
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Siobhan; carlo3b
I'll do my part. How sad that our society is taken hostage by a bunch of freaks--and that is what they are. It is totally unnatural to be gay.
24 posted on 05/14/2002 7:49:15 PM PDT by Angelique
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: chance33_98
Bump for the Salvation Army!

They have a mature conscience!

25 posted on 05/14/2002 8:12:59 PM PDT by Salvation
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: wife-mom
I agree hopefully they won't waiver....
26 posted on 05/15/2002 11:22:44 PM PDT by .45MAN
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Little Bill
The Salvation Army, my favorite couturier, has a right to make its own rules. The domestic partner law is stupid.
27 posted on 05/16/2002 3:32:54 AM PDT by rubbertramp
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: chance33_98;erizona;all
iThe Salvation Army's refusal to comply with Portland's domestic partnership ordinance could jeopardize the only activity center and meals-on-wheels program that serves the city's elderly.

PC vs religion, I pray that religion wins. The Salvation Army does good things, they should not be forced to feed the immorals. Everyone scream for the falacy of seperation of Church and State (which is a farce), but they don't scream it here where it the same issue.

28 posted on 05/16/2002 5:34:11 AM PDT by wwjdn
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: chance33_98
''I think the Salvation Army should be ashamed of itself for trying to decide who should get health care and who shouldn't,'' Geraghty said. ''That decision should cross over every religious line.''

I think the city of Portland should be ashamed for promoting homosexuality.

29 posted on 05/16/2002 8:17:36 AM PDT by kapn kuek
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: chance33_98
SAD = same-sex attraction disorder
30 posted on 05/16/2002 8:18:13 AM PDT by kapn kuek
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: chance33_98
''I think the Salvation Army should be ashamed of itself for trying to decide who should get health care and who shouldn't,'' Geraghty said. ''That decision should cross over every religious line.''

Should they be ashamed, Ms Mayor? Or should the city be ashamed for pushing an agenda that runs counter to the SA's sensibilities and beliefs? The SA does so much good for the city's elderly but that doesn't count much since there is an agenda at stake, right Ms. Mayor?

31 posted on 05/16/2002 9:33:07 AM PDT by hattend
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: chance33_98
More 'scorched earth' politics from the homosexual lobby.
32 posted on 05/16/2002 11:13:48 AM PDT by GSWarrior
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: chance33_98
Portland apparently does not care if they become a worldwide joke.

William Flax Return Of The Gods Web Site

33 posted on 05/16/2002 11:18:29 AM PDT by Ohioan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

My grandfather wasn't a particularily religious man.

However, he had a lot of time for the Salvation Army.

Ignorance aside, Salvation Army BUMP.

34 posted on 05/16/2002 11:21:04 AM PDT by Jakarta ex-pat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: chance33_98
''I think the city should be ashamed of itself for trying to decide who should get health care and who shouldn't,'' Geraghty said. ''That decision should cross over every politcally correct line.''

There ... that makes more sense than the original statement.

35 posted on 05/16/2002 11:25:34 AM PDT by BlueLancer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: wife-mom
Hope the Salvation Army stands on its principles.

I hope the federal government eliminates every penny of funding to Salvation Army. (And to every other charitable endeavor.)

As far as the Salvation Army standing on its principles...well, I don't really care.

Mark (Libertarian)

36 posted on 05/17/2002 9:54:27 AM PDT by Mark Bahner
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: chance33_98
''I think the Salvation Army should be ashamed of itself for trying to decide who should get health care and who shouldn't,'' Geraghty said. ''That decision should cross over every religious line.''

Of course, this is an outright lie from the homo mayor.

37 posted on 05/17/2002 9:57:43 AM PDT by Hacksaw
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Pushi
Except, of course, that the Salvation Army refused to take Second Amendment Sisters tee shirts to the volunteers working to search for survivors in the rubble of the twin towers, and were very nasty when they informed me that they are absolutely, totally, anti-gun, even for self-defense, no matter what the Bible says on the subject. They will never get another dime, or another minute of my time.

Why should they be receiving tax money, anyway? Weren't they supposed to be doing this out of the goodness of their hearts, as service to the Lord?

38 posted on 05/26/2002 7:22:49 PM PDT by MightyMouth
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: MightyMouth
Didn't know that. Strike another charity. Pretty soon we will be giving only to the animal shelter and the Church (a very conservative, Christian-extremist denomination).
39 posted on 05/26/2002 8:47:34 PM PDT by Pushi
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: Pushi
I know, it's very disappointing. I'm basically down to the local animal shelters (the HSUS has come out as anti-gun and anti-hunting), Second Amendment Sisters, 4H shooting programs, local food banks, some fundraising for supplies for home schoolers in the area, and then every pro-2A groups in existence. Of course, since I used to devote several hours a month and a fair amount of money to Salvation Army, that was all freed up for other things, including NRA instructor certification classes. One door closes, another opens... :o)
40 posted on 05/28/2002 10:38:18 AM PDT by MightyMouth
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-40 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson