On NOW at RadioFR!
7pm/10pm - The "Banana Republican", our own Luis Gonzalez, has a spirited interview with...none other than JACK THOMPSON!
This is a CALL IN SHOW! Talk to BATMAN JACK THOMPSON!
1-866-RadioFR! (866-723-4637)
Posted on 04/26/2002 9:05:05 PM PDT by chance33_98
The Salvation Army's refusal to comply with Portland's domestic partnership ordinance could jeopardize the only activity center and meals-on-wheels program that serves the city's elderly.
The organization received $60,000 a year from the city to operate its $400,000 meals program and the center for seniors.
But under the year-old ordinance, organizations that get federal funding through the city must provide health and employment benefits to domestic partners of employees.
Salvation Army officials have refused to comply with the ordinance, even if it means losing the money and having to scale back or close the senior programs.
The Bible-based, Christian organization, which believes that Scripture forbids sexual relations between members of the same sex, has asked the city for an exemption.
The issue surfaced in Portland four months after the Salvation Army took a stand against a similar domestic partnership law in San Francisco.
When the Portland City Council approved its ordinance last May, it voted 6-3 to reject an amendment that would have exempted religious organizations from compliance.
Councilor Philip ''Jack'' Dawson hopes to find a way to let the Salvation Army off the hook. He emphasizes the good the organization does by delivering meals to elderly shut-ins and providing a place for other seniors to participate in various activities.
''There's got to be a way to continue having them do what they have done so well for so long,'' Dawson said. ''Hopefully, we can do that without getting into their conscience or religious beliefs.''
Among those who question the Salvation Army's refusal to provide domestic partnership benefits is Mayor Karen Geraghty.
''I think the Salvation Army should be ashamed of itself for trying to decide who should get health care and who shouldn't,'' Geraghty said. ''That decision should cross over every religious line.''
The city is reviewing the ordinance at the request of the eastern territorial leadership of the Salvation Army, which is headquartered in New York. Local Salvation Army officials sought guidance from the territorial headquarters before signing this year's contract to receive $60,000 from the city.
The city provides domestic partner benefits to its employees and the Salvation Army's contract with the city stipulates that it must follow all ordinances related to human rights.
Hope the Salvation Army stands on its principles.
As I understand this, the SA can continue to do everything that they are currently doing, they just won't get $60,000 from the city to do it with. A budget cut of 15% would probably results in decreased services.
Sounds like it is time for private citizens to get out their check books if they believe in what the SA is doing.
I have no objection to spending the government's money for them, but always plan that it won't be there next year. Don't get dependent on it.
They should have thought of that in the first place, the dopes.
Is her nickname "Little Hillary"??? She should be ashamed of herself for making this ludicrous statement. Here's a solution, Ms. Geraghty: pull out your wallet and help the needy yourself, if you don't like how the SA does it! Sheesh!
No, B-bone, No.
The government has no money.
It is just a vehicle for re-directing how you spend your money.
On NOW at RadioFR!
7pm/10pm - The "Banana Republican", our own Luis Gonzalez, has a spirited interview with...none other than JACK THOMPSON!
This is a CALL IN SHOW! Talk to BATMAN JACK THOMPSON!
1-866-RadioFR! (866-723-4637)
How would they feel if the religious line was imposed on all of their decisions?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.