Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

SKYSCRAPER CRASH IN MILAN ITALY
Fownews

Posted on 04/18/2002 9:06:38 AM PDT by Bommer

Just reported that a small engine plane crashed into a Skyscraper in Milan Italy


TOPICS: Breaking News
KEYWORDS: smallplanecrash
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 981-1,0001,001-1,0201,021-1,040 ... 1,201-1,208 next last
To: mad_as_he$$
:O)
1,001 posted on 04/18/2002 12:28:10 PM PDT by MeekOneGOP
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 949 | View Replies]

To: codebreaker
How about Pilot remote control into the building after disabling the pilot?

Huh? If you mean sneak on board, take out the pilot, then install a remote control device and bail out of the plane while some other conspirator(s) take control from the ground, I'd say you've watched too many James Bond movies.

How about...suicide bomber charters a flight, kills the pilot (or IS the pilot, having rented the plane), and drives it into a building? Think that one is more plausable? (Hint: 9/11, teenage pilot, dozens of suicide bombers in Israel, ...)

We're not dealing with a particularly high-tech group here. We're not dealing with people who want to live a long life, and who have money and training and motivation to construct complex high-tech devices & schemes reminiscent of James Bond. These are people who are content to live in caves and kill themselves in the hope that they might take someone with them.

1,002 posted on 04/18/2002 12:28:42 PM PDT by ctdonath2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 960 | View Replies]

To: EternalHope
>...pilot suicide for personal reasons is your best bet

In the absence of anything better at this time, that is the most likely explanation.

1,003 posted on 04/18/2002 12:28:46 PM PDT by LostTribe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 662 | View Replies]

To: Utopia
One of the WTC planes went in on a bank, I believe.
1,004 posted on 04/18/2002 12:30:13 PM PDT by ecomcon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 916 | View Replies]

To: codebreaker
That must be the third or fourth time his age has changed.

C'mon! It has only been 3 hours since it happened! Proper fact-gathering takes longer than a shower.

1,005 posted on 04/18/2002 12:31:28 PM PDT by ctdonath2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 989 | View Replies]

To: aristeides
Going for the Vatican would p*** too many people off, and it would start a lot of people thinking more seriously about Mecca and Medina.

True...much better statement (and less costly) to take out a tire manufacturer. That's a bold statement in and of itself. A symbol of the wheels that the economy runs on, signifying they are taking down the economy.

Hey, if everybody else is going to have a conspiracy, I must have one as well!

1,006 posted on 04/18/2002 12:31:51 PM PDT by texlok
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1000 | View Replies]

To: Maitre_Z
Das Gebäude liegt nicht auf der Flugroute

No kidding? Maybe he was just a tad low on his glidepath.

1,007 posted on 04/18/2002 12:33:03 PM PDT by RightWhale
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 821 | View Replies]

To: Bommer
You obviously have a hard time reading between the lines. There is a difference between "READING" and "COMPREHENDING" posts...thankfully, other people here can do that. Of COURSE I know that the pilots that killed the original pilots on 911 were MEMBERS of the Al Qa'eda network, fool. What I was saying was that the ORIGINAL PILOTS were not, which is what could have happened here.

And don't even tell me that that is not likely, because you would be dead wrong.

1,008 posted on 04/18/2002 12:33:15 PM PDT by DJ88
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1000 | View Replies]

To: ctdonath2
At least I know from Google that this guy is a pro boxer in 1950, that would make him at least 65 or 70..
1,009 posted on 04/18/2002 12:34:02 PM PDT by codebreaker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1005 | View Replies]

To: texlok
That was NOT the main business that was conducted in that building. For the 100th time. It was used by GOVERNMENT agencies and was THE financial symbol of Italy.
1,010 posted on 04/18/2002 12:34:43 PM PDT by DJ88
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1006 | View Replies]

To: texlok
WTC were symbols for us that got the world's attention. Crashing a plane into any building in Italy...hrmmm..what is a big symbol in Italy, that would get the attention of the world, and make a point....hrmmm... ...oh yeah, the VATICAN!

This building is reported to be "a symbol of Milan, Italy’s financial capital"... sort of like the WTC in NYC. It is also the tallest building in Italy... sort of like the WTC in NYC. If you want to make a statement in Italy like you did in the U.S.A. - it sounds like this is the building to hit.

1,011 posted on 04/18/2002 12:37:04 PM PDT by PrivateIdaho
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 997 | View Replies]

To: DJ88
Calm down, I was just making a little joke about an airplane crash (tacky I know) and all of the symbolism being read into everything.
1,012 posted on 04/18/2002 12:38:11 PM PDT by texlok
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1010 | View Replies]

To: DJ88
Feelin Foolish so I will lash out at others to take the focus off of me.....That diagnosis will cost you 15 dollars.
1,013 posted on 04/18/2002 12:39:14 PM PDT by Delbert
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1008 | View Replies]

To: expatriot
I don't see any sign of an aircraft, ergo; it is a hoax!

AH HA! Look at these.

In pictures: Milan plane crash



Wreckage from the plane, which had been flying from the town of Locarno in Switzerland, lay in pieces.



The Italian interior minister said it was "probably an accident".

1,014 posted on 04/18/2002 12:39:39 PM PDT by michigander
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 303 | View Replies]

To: texlok
Do they waste a good-sized airplane on a 30 story concrete tower in Milan, or go for the Vatican?

It's the tallest building in Italy, so it sure would get the attention of Italy. (Why Italy? That's the part I don't understand.)

The Vatican is not a tall, easily-hit item. May also be hard to see from a distance. Consider that the DC 9/11 plane flew right over the White House - a likely and distinctive target, yet hard to see from the air. Instead, they went for the Pentagon: a huge unmistakable building with wide open spaces around it. The Vatican is likely not quite so large, distinctive, visible, or surrounded by low open spaces.

Also - so far - Bin Laden & Co.'s rhetoric has said nothing about religious differences, i.e.: Islam vs. Catholicism. They're not after devout Christians, they're after agnostic/athiestic capitalists - hence the focus on places of business and politics.

1,015 posted on 04/18/2002 12:39:45 PM PDT by ctdonath2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 997 | View Replies]

To: PrivateIdaho
This building is reported to be "a symbol of Milan, Italy’s financial capital"... sort of like the WTC in NYC. It is also the tallest building in Italy... sort of like the WTC in NYC. If you want to make a statement in Italy like you did in the U.S.A. - it sounds like this is the building to hit.

According to this thread, Islamics want to wipe out all non-Islamics, and start a holy war, etc. etc. etc. etc. So they hit a government building instead of the Vatican - okay, if it were terrorists, which nobody on this thread knows, even if they slept in a Holiday Inn Express or played a flight sim, why would they pass up the chance of taking out a spiritual symbol for almost a billion of the world's population?

1,016 posted on 04/18/2002 12:41:27 PM PDT by texlok
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1011 | View Replies]

To: Utopia
Whether or not it was terrorism, it at the very least indicates a pilot with serious psychological problems. I can't think of any reason for a competent pilot to slam into a building even with engine trouble.

I'm wondering if the pilot hadn't passed out by the time he hit the building. If there was fire aboard as some reports are saying, there was probably a lot of smoke and he may have lost consciousness.

1,017 posted on 04/18/2002 12:43:22 PM PDT by texasbluebell
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 541 | View Replies]

To: codebreaker
this guy is a pro boxer in 1950

Hey, HEY, I think you're on to something here...wait a minute...wasn't there some kind of boxer rebellion I read about in school?!?

1,018 posted on 04/18/2002 12:43:28 PM PDT by Sender
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1009 | View Replies]

To: ctdonath2
Also - so far - Bin Laden & Co.'s rhetoric has said nothing about religious differences, i.e.: Islam vs. Catholicism. They're not after devout Christians, they're after agnostic/athiestic capitalists - hence the focus on places of business and politics

I have a hard time accepting this, according to many at FR, Islamics are out to wipe out Christians and Jews.

Being a capitalist doesn't make you an atheist or agnostic btw.

1,019 posted on 04/18/2002 12:43:29 PM PDT by texlok
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1015 | View Replies]

To: Sender
Hey, HEY, I think you're on to something here...wait a minute...wasn't there some kind of boxer rebellion I read about in school?!?

We are definitely on to something!!!!! The Chinese were involved weren't they??????

1,020 posted on 04/18/2002 12:44:14 PM PDT by texlok
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1018 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 981-1,0001,001-1,0201,021-1,040 ... 1,201-1,208 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson