Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Van Dam Trial Transcripts, Complete: Testimony continues to vary from previous statements.
San Diego Superior Court/Union Trib ^ | April 9, 2002 | San Diego Superior Court-Kristen Green

Posted on 04/09/2002 11:30:44 AM PDT by FresnoDA

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 361-368 next last
To: ~Kim4VRWC's~
Thanks for today and yesterday's ping!
41 posted on 04/09/2002 3:35:42 PM PDT by Lanza
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: FresnoDA
You weirdo...


42 posted on 04/09/2002 3:39:56 PM PDT by Freedom2specul8
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: FresnoDA
Maybe you can answer today...the following question:

Do you know what role the FBI played when the first 13 hours?

43 posted on 04/09/2002 3:46:53 PM PDT by Freedom2specul8
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: ~Kim4VRWC's~
when = during..
44 posted on 04/09/2002 3:47:55 PM PDT by Freedom2specul8
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: Lanza
Hi lanza! It's getting to be a long wait until the trial.
45 posted on 04/09/2002 3:49:24 PM PDT by Freedom2specul8
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: ~Kim4VRWC's~
OK...this is one of the following:

a)    Diversion from what so far has been a fast past and information packed thread.

b)    Personal shot, in the hope that FDA will hit the abuse button, (taint going to happen).

c)    Weirdness by a textbook example of a VD apologist.

d)    ALL OF THE ABOVE

46 posted on 04/09/2002 3:50:15 PM PDT by FresnoDA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: vacrn
Anyone who could walk upright?
47 posted on 04/09/2002 3:50:56 PM PDT by Jaded
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: All

Sorry for that commercial interruption, now, back to the thread.....


48 posted on 04/09/2002 3:52:23 PM PDT by FresnoDA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: FresnoDA
Well, since you had to lower IQ level of one of your posts a notch.. (you know which one I refer to) it was simply a must to put a face with it. ::giggle::
49 posted on 04/09/2002 3:56:20 PM PDT by Freedom2specul8
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: Jaded
eeeewww!!
50 posted on 04/09/2002 3:58:01 PM PDT by vacrn
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: FresnoDA
If you don't like personal shots, don't give them
51 posted on 04/09/2002 3:58:49 PM PDT by Freedom2specul8
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]

To: ~Kim4VRWC's~
"Do you know what role the FBI played when the first 13 hours?"

Do you? Please share with us, if so.

52 posted on 04/09/2002 3:59:14 PM PDT by MizSterious
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: all
Why lie indeed?

It has not been established that she lied. Read the PH. Prosecution stipulated only that Feldman had affadavits from two witnesses to "impeach" Brenda, not that they were true and correct. AND the prosecution stipulated them only for the PH and specifically not for trial. Meaning, prosecution reserved the right to dispute them at trial and possibly "impeach the impeachers".

The stipulation was procedural to speed the PH, and indicates nothing about the truth of the matter.

The defense is going to have to show that the witnesses knew DW and Brenda well enough to identify them, don't have axes to grind, and are credible witnesses of the truth. That they arrived at the bar before DW left and after the dancing started. Brenda claims to have danced with an older gent whom she knew slightly, but couldn't remember his name (I couldn't quite understand if she meant at the time of the hearing, or at the time she danced with him, and it wasn't pursued). This leaves doubt about what the "witnesses" saw, or what they think they saw. What if they don't know DW, really, but claim to recognise him as the man she danced with from t.v. coverage, but it's really the other guy.?

53 posted on 04/09/2002 4:00:41 PM PDT by Valpal1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: FresnoDA
D! D!

Did I pass the test?

54 posted on 04/09/2002 4:02:20 PM PDT by MizSterious
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: ~Kim4VRWC's~
For someone who got it so very wrong on the transcript location (place--wrong: not Jameson's; name--wrong: not "Jason's"; Jameson--wrong: not male) I don't think you're quite the one to talk about IQ! You're a laff-riot tonight, Kim! Ever think of auditioning for one of the late night talk show guests?
55 posted on 04/09/2002 4:09:16 PM PDT by MizSterious
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]

To: MizSterious
The photo of Brenda Van Dam on top of this thread is disturbing. She looks to be sixty years old. I think she wears fake eyelashes. That is not the reason why I distrust her and that Damon guy. But, it could be enough.
56 posted on 04/09/2002 4:11:06 PM PDT by Lauratealeaf
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies]

To: Valpal1
It has not been established that she lied. Read the PH.

You're right Valpall, it has not been established that she lied. I've read the PH transcripts.

The bartender will impeach Brenda's testimony, Cherokee Youngs will impeach Brenda's testimony, Glennie Nasland will impeach Brenda's testimony and as far as the transcripts indicate, Barbara Easton and Denise will also impeach Brenda's testimony. Could it be that Brenda is telling the truth and everyone else got it wrong?

57 posted on 04/09/2002 4:12:54 PM PDT by vacrn
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies]

To: MizSterious

Yes...you pass the test....AND, you get to collect Two Hundred Dollars.

Kimmie, pay Miz.......LOL!!


58 posted on 04/09/2002 4:16:21 PM PDT by FresnoDA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies]

To: ~Kim4VRWC's~
Notice you seem to be the designated whipping boy these days.

Could you repost the link to your info page again. THX.

59 posted on 04/09/2002 4:17:17 PM PDT by Valpal1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies]

To: ~Kim4VRWC's~
"If you don't like personal shots, don't give them"

If you don't like it when people think you're ignorant, don't post without knowing what you're talking about. What's the old saying? "Before posting, find brain, then engage same." Or words to that effect.

60 posted on 04/09/2002 4:18:42 PM PDT by MizSterious
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 361-368 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson