Free Republic
Browse · Search
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Van Dam Trial Transcripts, Complete: Testimony continues to vary from previous statements.
San Diego Superior Court/Union Trib ^ | April 9, 2002 | San Diego Superior Court-Kristen Green

Posted on 04/09/2002 11:30:44 AM PDT by FresnoDA

click here to read article

Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100 ... 361-368 next last
To: vacrn
You got 3 out of five wrong. Read a little closer, to what the judge says about Barb, Denise and the bartender, that their testimony did not indicate impeachement as stated by Feldman, who had to back up. Only Glennie's and Cherokee's statements were stipulated, and only for the purposes of speeding the PH. At Trial is where this issue will be duked out.
61 posted on 04/09/2002 4:21:18 PM PDT by Valpal1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 57 | View Replies]

To: Valpal1
Hi Val, do you mean this one or the transcript page?
62 posted on 04/09/2002 4:24:32 PM PDT by Freedom2specul8
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 59 | View Replies]

To: ~Kim4VRWC's~
It was the geocities one. Thanks.
63 posted on 04/09/2002 4:27:55 PM PDT by Valpal1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 62 | View Replies]

To: Lanza
Another thing that bothers me is this.

Whether or not they knew Westerfield previously, if they now felt that this man had harmed, molested, murdered their 7-year-old daughter, [even if he didn't, or even if they felt so only because the state had so charged him]...

THEY WOULD HAVE BEEN LIVID in the courtroom. They would have almost had to be restrained to prevent their tearing him limb from limb!

Instead, Mrs VD smiles at him, mouths "Hi, Dave" ... mentions him only in a kindly tone, then at the end refers to him at least once as "Dave" even though early in her testimony she was trying to say she didn't know him, had never danced with him, etc. Separated by that glass barrier, she still seems to melt, seems about to ask him over for drinks and dinner.

Note also that DAMON does not seem angry or upset with Mr Westerfield, does not view him as an enemy, seems to lack the hostility that a neighbor charging him with having a noisy nuisance of a DOG might have in some little city court matter...Again, actually seems to LIKE the guy, more than anything else.

This just isn't human nature, and it will not wash.

64 posted on 04/09/2002 4:30:32 PM PDT by crystalk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: ~Kim4VRWC's~

Here is one of the first reports about the F. B. I.....


Parents Plead For Daughter's Safe Return

7-Year-Old Girl Missing Since Friday Night

Posted: 7:46 a.m. PST February 4, 2002
Updated: 5:23 p.m. PST February 4, 2002
David WesterfieldSAN DIEGO -- Police said Monday that they believe 7-year-old girl Danielle van Dam -- who vanished from her suburban home on Friday -- was abducted.

Most of the volunteers who spent the weekend searching canyons for the girl have been replaced by investigators who said that they have no suspects and few leads.

"We have no reason to believe she walked away," San Diego Police Department spokesman Dave Cohen said. "We would have found her already if that was the case."

Danielle was last seen Friday night when her father put her to bed.

The girl with shoulder-length blond hair lives with her parents and two brothers in the suburb of Sabre Springs, near the city of Poway.

A corner park near the van Dam's home (pictured, right) was adorned Monday with pink and purple ribbons and a large banner reading: "Hurry Home, Danielle. We Miss You."

Neighbors found it hard to believe a stranger could have seized the girl from her bedroom.

Neighbor Adel Crawford-Laumer told 10News that she felt she had to do anything she could to help find Danielle. She spent Monday passing out flyers and talking to residents.

"Poway-Sabre Springs is a big community, but when something like this happens, it's a small community; it's a small town," Crawford-Laumer said. "I have three kids that go to school in this area, and they have just been very upset about what happened to this little girl, and want to do something. As a family, this is what we wanted to do."

Investigators so far have not ruled out that Danielle was abducted by a stranger. Law enforcement teams spent much of Monday interviewing Danielle's parents again and talking with neighbors.

Police said that the van Dams were not considered suspects.

altDanielle's distraught parents, Damon and Brenda van Dam, appeared briefly outside the home Monday and read a statement.

"Our hearts are aching for this very special girl," Damon van Dam said.

The couple displayed a set of pale blue pajamas with colored flowers like those worn by Danielle when she disappeared.

Authorities believe the girl left her two-story beige home between 10:30 p.m. Friday and 7 a.m. Saturday, when her older and younger brothers woke up.

Damon van Dam, told investigators he woke up around 1:30 a.m. Saturday to let out the family dog and noticed a burglar alarm light was blinking. He discovered a sliding glass door was open and he closed it.

Danielle's mother had spent the evening out with four friends at a local bar. She arrived home around 2:30 a.m. and stayed up for another hour with her husband and friends.

Brenda van Dam checked to make sure Danielle's bedroom door and that of her brothers' room were closed to keep from disturbing them, but didn't check in on the children.

It wasn't until around 9 a.m., when one of Danielle's friends came over to play with her, that the family realized she was gone.

The family had moved from Florida to the quiet neighborhood three years ago. Damon van Dam works for wireless technology firm Qualcomm.

Investigators questioned registered sex offenders in the area. The FBI was offering assistance but was not actively investigating because there was no evidence Danielle had left California, spokeswoman Jan Caldwell said.

Jenni Thompson, spokeswoman for the Polly Klaas Foundation in Petaluma, said that the most important task would be to get the word out about the case to as many people as possible. The more people who know, the greater the chance someone will have information that could give police a break.

The foundation, organized in the wake of the 1993 abduction and slaying of 12-year-old Polly Hannah Klaas, assists in searching for about 600 children each year.

The organization learned of Danielle's disappearance Monday morning and was preparing to work with police to help distribute information about the case and offer support to the family.

65 posted on 04/09/2002 4:34:48 PM PDT by FresnoDA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies]

To: MizSterious
Cute, but no Cigar.....We all have noticed that you conveniantly ignored my posts about gender/sex of JAMESON, and how HER user profile doesn't show her gender/sex....

Dats otay miz sterious. You are not being held accountable or anything like that.

66 posted on 04/09/2002 4:34:49 PM PDT by Freedom2specul8
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 60 | View Replies]

To: FresnoDA
Thanks..So the next question would be, what assistance did they provide? Do they oversee the investigation?
67 posted on 04/09/2002 4:36:24 PM PDT by Freedom2specul8
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 65 | View Replies]

To: FresnoDA
Hey fres, thanks for the Augusta for one of the practice rounds of the Masters...what a place!!!!!
68 posted on 04/09/2002 4:37:20 PM PDT by demsux
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: ~Kim4VRWC's~
Ok, let's put it this way. I did my homework. You didn't. Sometimes it takes more than looking up the user profile.
69 posted on 04/09/2002 4:40:02 PM PDT by MizSterious
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 66 | View Replies]

To: Valpal1
Val, I forgot about Patricia LePage also impeaching Brenda's testimony. Val, they will all impeach Brenda's testimony about events surrounding that night. At the PH, only the "dancing" issue was allowed in. You are right, though, the trial is going to be a humdinger.
70 posted on 04/09/2002 4:41:53 PM PDT by vacrn
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 61 | View Replies]

To: Valpal1
You're welcome!

Notice you seem to be the designated whipping boy these days.

yeah, you know their fascination for swinging stuff...whips, and chains. :)

71 posted on 04/09/2002 4:42:08 PM PDT by Freedom2specul8
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 59 | View Replies]

To: MizSterious
Ok, let's put it this way...there is a difference between researching valuable important and contributory topics and your kind of "homework"..why does her gender matter so much to you that we have to post about it so much? I didn't hurt her feelings. In her emails to me, neither she nor I felt a need to discuss each others gender. SO WHAT! I'm done talking about your trivial complaints. (which is usually what they are..trivial)
72 posted on 04/09/2002 4:45:17 PM PDT by Freedom2specul8
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 69 | View Replies]

To: ~Kim4VRWC's~
Kim, were all those words too big for you? Let's take this a few at a time:

"The FBI was offering assistance" (*In other words, they said they could help) "but was not actively investigating" (*but that they couldn't help a lot) "because there was no evidence Danielle had left California, spokeswoman Jan Caldwell said." (*this means, it's not their jurisdiction. Wait, that's a pretty big word. Let's just say it's not their JOB to help unless she'd been taken to another state.) Hope this helps.

73 posted on 04/09/2002 4:46:05 PM PDT by MizSterious
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 67 | View Replies]

To: ~Kim4VRWC's~
Short answer: her gender is not important to me. Longer answer: I read messages on the forum. Duhhhh!
74 posted on 04/09/2002 4:48:02 PM PDT by MizSterious
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 72 | View Replies]

To: ~Kim4VRWC's~
Kimbo....stick to the thread....WHO CARES if Jameson is a girl?????
75 posted on 04/09/2002 4:50:29 PM PDT by FresnoDA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 66 | View Replies]

To: FresnoDA
I'm really starting to seriously question your ability to tell the difference between truth and your opinion. Come on Fresno, for once, take off your blinders and tell that to your bud, MIZ STERIOUS. Who do you think BROUGHT IT UP.
76 posted on 04/09/2002 4:52:35 PM PDT by Freedom2specul8
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 75 | View Replies]

To: Valpal1;all

Just got back, so I can't reply to all the good comments, but Val you are assuming that Damon is telling the Truth, when you said "how would he have time to vacuum"? I am going under the suspicion that Damon or someone else, could have killed Danielle way before the 3:30am time table. Even BEFORE Brenda got home. Anything is possible. No one can vouch that the child was actually in her bedroom from 8:30 till she turned up missing, can they? You are believing the parents, this is where we part ways. I'm not giving them the benefit of the doubt here.

They have told too many conflicting versions of THAT night, to be trusted with what the truth is.

Now, to answer my own question, WHY would Brenda and Damon lie about their association with Westerfield? You say the transcripts don't prove they did. Forget the transcripts, go back to the interview on Larry King Live, or even John Walsh's report.

Brenda and Damon claimed they only knew him in passing, to merely wave at him and sell boxes of Girl Scout Cookies at his front door. It was the mere sight of Danielle that caused Westerfield to become infatuated with the child, the van Dams want us to believe.

But surprise! At the preliminary hearing, we find out that Brenda actually not only went into his house, but the children played out back, and it was then she made contact with Westerfield regarding their "adult parties".

So yes, Brenda lied.

Then we have her saying she went upstairs to wake Damon to come down and have Pizza with her and the friends. BUT WAIT, she left out that she actually went upstairs and interrupted the liason between Barb and Damon, in her own BEDROOM. She, left it out? Another lie.

Why? Because distancing themselves from Westerfield didn't fit into their alibi for what they want everyone to believe happened that evening. They want us to think that Westerfield was the perp...that he was stalking the little Danielle and they didn't really know or associate with him. Make everyone think that Westerfield wasn't interested in adult sex, noooo...focus on turning him into a man who was a child molester...a ped.

They have proven they are most capable of lieing.


77 posted on 04/09/2002 4:52:36 PM PDT by spectre
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 61 | View Replies]

To: MizSterious
Miz sterious, I no longer have interest in your pathetic attempts at humor and snottiness..GEE, I wonder why! LOL
78 posted on 04/09/2002 4:54:02 PM PDT by Freedom2specul8
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 73 | View Replies]

To: spectre
Yes, there are great comments in between the BS.. Hi Spec..
79 posted on 04/09/2002 4:54:42 PM PDT by Freedom2specul8
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 77 | View Replies]

To: ~Kim4VRWC's~
Kim wrote:

I have no clue why I wrote Jason and not Jameson

Asked and answered.........LOL

80 posted on 04/09/2002 4:59:37 PM PDT by FresnoDA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 72 | View Replies]

Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100 ... 361-368 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794 is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson