Skip to comments.
Van Dam Trial Transcripts, Complete: Testimony continues to vary from previous statements.
San Diego Superior Court/Union Trib ^
| April 9, 2002
| San Diego Superior Court-Kristen Green
Posted on 04/09/2002 11:30:44 AM PDT by FresnoDA
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 301-320, 321-340, 341-360, 361-368 next last
To: ~Kim4VRWC's~
Just for your information, I did not accuse him of being a swinger... But nice try.
Infatuated = support/love
Your words kimbo...
To: FresnoDA
Hey Fres, when is the next important court date coming up? I need to re-finish my tin foil hat (just in case), clean my flame-retardant ensemb and lock and load my extinguisher. Oh and restock papertowels and diet coke.
342
posted on
04/10/2002 2:26:33 PM PDT
by
Jaded
To: ~Kim4VRWC's~
Maybe you think that his constant harping on it makes him a perv, but I don't think so.. Sheesh
Constant harping??? Uhmmm....I posted the Basic Rules of swinging...and the LuvSeat.....must I again do a kimbo audit....the last time an audit was performed, you had posted more than 28% of all the posts on numerous VD threads....and yea, many were about child abusers and pedophiles....
Remember, sharper than a two-edged sword......
FresnoDA
To: MizSterious;all
To: FresnoDA
NOOOOO..not the LUV seat post again!!! (big grins )...Luv, Nadia
sw
345
posted on
04/10/2002 2:31:19 PM PDT
by
spectre
To: rolling_stone
Ouch! We are dismayed. No TV? Poop!
sw
346
posted on
04/10/2002 2:35:02 PM PDT
by
spectre
To: rolling_stone
You win!! Wonder if Mudd will tell Court TV to, um, take a walk, too? He certainly runs a tight ship. Guess, now I'll have to go troll another forum.
347
posted on
04/10/2002 2:39:13 PM PDT
by
Jaded
To: rolling_stone
Ok, sorry, I am a law novice. Does this mean the entire trial is closed for TV coverage, or just the next set of hearings?
To: Politicalmom
So far just the motions, I believe the issue of televising the trial will be decided later...
Notice two items from the article
The court minutes from Tuesday also show that prosecutor Jeff Dusek met briefly with Judge Mudd to submit four sets of documents for review. The judge determined the defense was entitled to have two of the sets.
Private attorneys have speculated that possible motions could include a defense request to have the trial moved out of San Diego because of intense media coverage and a move by the prosecution to limit inquiries into the supposed "swinging" lifestyle of Danielle's parents, Brenda and Damon van Dam.
To: FresnoDA
The girl was told she could go wake up Danielle - - but she didn't - - she went to play with the boys. She went to her room - her door was all the way open - her bed had stuff on it - her beanbag, her dog. Note her door was all the way open. Brenda stated when she arrived home with her friends at 2:10 she went to make sure the kids doors were shut.
Ah, but did Brenda really close the door.
Wouldn't Brenda and Damon have noticed Danielle's bedroom door opened when they went by it in the morning to go downstairs?
Danielle was taken out of the home AFTER The Damon and Brenda went to sleep.
Why? Who says? The VD's?
Could Brenda have not noticed the door opened? If the door was opened, like the little girl said, why didnt Brenda notice?
What was it really like in the morning at the VD house.
350
posted on
04/10/2002 2:46:48 PM PDT
by
It's me
To: It's me
NEW THREAD..BREAKING NEWS....
To: FresnoDA
No no no no no no no! Doggone it!! Ya'll got yerselves cornfuuused Fres!
But rather than re-explain it..and trust me, I want to respond, but I also want vacrn to return, so I shall let this one just fade away!!
To: ~Kim4VRWC's~; FresnoDA; MizSterious; vacrn; spectre
Im with vacrn, all this squabbling has gotten ridiculous so that Ive stayed away, but I do want to respond to this comment of Kims:
BUT..if you are so inclined to continue to do so that is your choice. If I were you, in your outrage, I would contact Pierce (you can do it, you're all in the same state) and start a massive drive to get people to sue the van dam's for negligence in the civil court, prove your case and get the other kids removed from their home, instead of sitting on here, yelling at Me and Val. In fact, if you all win, you can make good ol damon pay for it. Yep, that's what I would do if my passion was a strong as yours.
As usual with the qualifier that California law can be quite different, I strongly, highly doubt that Kim's proposal is the least bit feasible. We here have no standing to sue the Van Dams. Their actions have caused no injury to us, or to anyone with which we are connected. Therefore, we have no cause of action.
353
posted on
04/10/2002 9:32:39 PM PDT
by
Amore
To: FresnoDA
Q: Did Danielle go to the dentist? A: Yes. Q: Do you remember the name of her dentist? A: No I don't. It's "A Poway Dental". Q: Dr.(garbled) does that name ring a bell at all? If it does fine if not that's fine too. A: No.Been out of town, but WHO is this dentist guy and why is Feldman so interested in him. Slipped him it right in after describing the layout of the 2nd floor (and what is on the doors)...maybe a "friend" of the VD's that had an "intimate" knowledge of the home and/or Brenda AND/OR DAMON.
354
posted on
04/10/2002 9:37:48 PM PDT
by
demsux
To: demsux;MizSterious
Agreed, not sure about the dentist...Miz??
To: FresnoDA
Boy, i'll tell you what...i haven't read the whole transcript yet, but Feldman definitely has an angle
356
posted on
04/10/2002 10:03:02 PM PDT
by
demsux
To: demsux
A: Keith was very interested in Barbara and he asked me he said you gotta make this happen for me and I said well you can come back to the house for a minute and talk to her and that's about all I can do. And Barbara and Denise had to come back to the house to get their car.That Brenda is one helluva buddy...
357
posted on
04/10/2002 10:17:20 PM PDT
by
demsux
To: demsux
Q: Went to the front door? A: To the front door. Q: Then what happened? A: I opened the door with a key and we all went in.So Damon had the presence of mind to lock the front door, but didn't even check the other doors...yeah right
358
posted on
04/10/2002 10:20:39 PM PDT
by
demsux
To: demsux
A: Because when we go on trips sometimes we'll leave very early in the morning and we will carry them down the stairs and put them into the car while they're sleeping. Q: Can you carry her?
A: Not anymore. Q: How about your husband? Is he big enough and strong enough to carry her? A: Yes. Q: He doesn't have to drag her? He's strong enough to carry her in his arms?So what about the drag marks by the garage?
359
posted on
04/10/2002 10:31:52 PM PDT
by
demsux
To: FresnoDA
Q: Did she sleep with anything on her feet
A: No. Q: ..... like slippers or socks? A: No. Q: so the skin would be exposed when she's sleeping on her feet? A: Yes.Could be interesting if they found her with socks/slippers on her feet!
360
posted on
04/10/2002 10:50:43 PM PDT
by
demsux
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 301-320, 321-340, 341-360, 361-368 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson