Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Doctors close offices in protest
Aberdeen American News ^ | April 8, 2002 | LYNN BREZOSKY AP writer

Posted on 04/08/2002 12:07:09 PM PDT by jwalburg

Doctors close offices in protest


Associated Press

Hundreds of doctors and other medical professionals closed their offices Monday to protest malpractice lawsuits that they say have led to skyrocketing insurance premiums.

Many of them descended on the Hildago County Courthouse Monday for a "day of awareness."

Dr. Jose Igoa, a 47-year-old psychiatrist who held a picket sign, says he paid $28,000 for medical malpractice insurance last year - three to four times what he paid five years ago. Now, he can't find a renewal policy at all.

Like other doctors here, he says he has been the target of frivolous lawsuits that take time out of his practice and are emotionally stressful.

He says the problem is getting worse.

"We're doctors. We train more than half of our lives to help people. We don't want to cause harm to anybody," he said. "We understand that when we cause some damage we want people to be fairly compensated. But when it comes to legal extortion ... it changes the way we practice medicine."

Up the coast in Nueces County, where 63 percent of doctors had claims filed against them in the last 13 years, doctors planned simultaneous activities to show support.

Emergency services at hospitals will not be stopped.

"They see this as a plea for survival for doctors and patients," said Jon Opelt of Citizens Against Lawsuit Abuse, which helped organize and publicize the protest.

Critics of the walkout say doctors are being misled by groups backed by big business and seeking limits on jury awards. They say there's no guarantee insurance companies will pass savings from such limits onto policy holders. Meanwhile, they say, tort reforms give patients less recourse against medical errors that kill more people than car accidents, cancer or AIDS.

"Instead of marching on a courthouse, turning their backs on patients, they ought to be marching on the governor's office and joining with constituents to try to do something about skyrocketing insurance rates," said Craig McDonald, director of the lobbying group Texans for Public Justice.

In Texas and nationwide, the insurance industry has been rocked by the stock market slide, the aftermath of the Sept. 11 terrorist attacks and lawsuit expenses.

Since 1999, seven of 17 malpractice insurance carriers serving Texas have either left or gone belly up, according to the Texas Department of Insurance.

"Over the last couple of years, we have been paying out more in claims than we have taken in in premiums," said Julie Pulliam of the National Insurance Association. "Claim costs have gone through the roof. The primary reason is the cost of lawsuits. That's why insurers are very supportive of tort reform."


TOPICS: Breaking News; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: doctors; insurance; malpractice; protest
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 101-109 next last
Aeh, who needs doctors anyway?
1 posted on 04/08/2002 12:07:09 PM PDT by jwalburg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: jwalburg
Somehow I think legal and illegal immigration from Mexico is a factor here. There have been immigrant insurance scam rings in other cities. Mostly automobile insurance though.
2 posted on 04/08/2002 12:15:42 PM PDT by dennisw
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dennisw
Its about a history of excess jury awards and frivolous lawsuits. South Texas is known as a hotbed of both. In fact for years lawsuits for accidents anywhere in the world would be brought to S. Texas if the company had any business dealings at all in Texas. Its a huge cry for tort reform. Those 'critics' noted in the article are trial lawyers. There's a special place in Hell reserved for most of them.
3 posted on 04/08/2002 12:21:27 PM PDT by Diddle E. Squat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: dennisw
Its the plaintiff's bar at work here. The good doctors should spell it out.
4 posted on 04/08/2002 12:22:26 PM PDT by Eric in the Ozarks
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: dennisw
This is going on all over the place. The skyrocketing cost of being in business as a doctor encourages the shady "padding" of insurance claims.
5 posted on 04/08/2002 12:23:22 PM PDT by NotJustAnotherPrettyFace
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: jwalburg
Hey, I've got a great idea--let's nationalize health care! Then you couldn't sue the doctors and everyone gets quality health care for free! Wheeeeeeeeee!!
6 posted on 04/08/2002 12:24:23 PM PDT by randog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jwalburg
This is a huge problem in south Texas. Doctors are moving away or choosing early retirement. The mal practice suits are incredibly corrupt, with Judges and juries awarding 100s of thousands of dollars to plantifs even if there is no liability at all by doctors or hospitals. Its like a huge lottery for sick people.

It is affecting everything from hospital charges, which have almost doubled in the last year, to ordinary medical insurance, which is also up almost 100%. Soon the insurance industry is going to collapse in south Texas. It simply cannot continue to function with all the frivolous law suits.

7 posted on 04/08/2002 12:24:50 PM PDT by monday
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dennisw
I don't know about Texas .. but doctors up North are having problems also

Face it .. we live in a sue happy society ..

8 posted on 04/08/2002 12:25:03 PM PDT by Mo1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Diddle E. Squat
Thanks for info. Do you think poor immigrants might be the ones most likely to respond to the flashy adverts by the trial lawyers? The ones who advertize "Hablamos Espanol"?
9 posted on 04/08/2002 12:27:27 PM PDT by dennisw
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: dennisw
Well I don't know about TX but in CA the insurance fraud losses are astronomical. We have clinics where "doctors" pay individuals to "claim" injuries in auto accidents that are totally fraudulent. The last time I went to my doctor for a physical I had to sign a waiver that I would not sue but would allow an arbitrator to settle a claim if one was made against my doctor (don't know how legal or binding the waiver was but it was a first for me). Why couldn't these doctors just insure themselves with a bond? Is that not possible?
10 posted on 04/08/2002 12:28:05 PM PDT by kellynla
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: dennisw
Northern NM has lost many of its doctors over the last few years. Mostly this is due to the practice of malpractice suits. Governmental regulations have encouraged several MDs in the area to retire out of frustration. It's not just a Texas thing.
11 posted on 04/08/2002 12:30:15 PM PDT by Doctor Stochastic
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: jwalburg
I don't know if things have changed in recent years, but there used to be a strong tendency among doctors and their malpractice carriers to simply settle out of court rather than go through a costly and time consuming trial, which would only give the doctor bad publicity. I always thought that this served to increase the number of suits filed......patients stood a good chance of being "paid to go away" even if their cases had little merit.
12 posted on 04/08/2002 12:34:31 PM PDT by freedox
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jwalburg
Doctors: reap what you sow... AMA... Medicins sans Frontiers... APA...
13 posted on 04/08/2002 12:38:26 PM PDT by Sloth
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jwalburg
The solution is to cap all legal fees, like Medicare does doctor's fees on the elderly.
14 posted on 04/08/2002 12:40:58 PM PDT by thinktwice
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NotJustAnotherPrettyFace
Excessive malpractise insurance is a big problem in PA too. In fact, only DC has higher malpractise insurance.

Some doctors are leaving Pennsylvania to practise elsewhere. Some are just leaving the profession.

15 posted on 04/08/2002 12:41:49 PM PDT by NEPA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: jwalburg
It's about time.
16 posted on 04/08/2002 12:43:30 PM PDT by ppaul
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mo1
Malpractice insurance has become cost prohibitive in many medical specialties, I've been told that the one neurosurgeon left in my county has an insurance bill upwards of $200,000 every year.

Med students are choosing "safer" specialties, and sick or injured people have to choose from smaller and smaller pools of specialists. The demand for specialists therefore becomes greater and market forces push the costs of surgery up. Fewer specialists means that less talented surgeons are used more often, and more malpractice cases occur, raising rates even further. Insurance companies have to charge higher rates to cover expenses and settlements because the pool of specialists is becoming smaller each year. The only people making out on this deal are a few bloodsucking lawyers who may even see themselves as ultimately making society a better place.

17 posted on 04/08/2002 12:50:18 PM PDT by jz638
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: freedox
I can speak from experience here. I am involved in a malpractice suit. I can not discuss the case. Suffice it to say, my husband's health has been permanently damaged. He will live in pain for the rest of his life. He has a choice take narcotics or live with the pain. He hates to take pain pills. It has been nearly four years during which the insurance company played "hardball" with us. Finally, we will get our day in court this month. It will be a "directed verdict" most likely. This means the judge says their is overwhelming evidence of the defendent's guilt. The only question the jury will be involved in is the size of the judgement. We attempted to settle this case four years ago and have tried periodically since then. The insurance company has refused to offer a fair amount. In court, we will ask for five times the amount, we offered in settlement talks. If we win and the jury award us anywhere close to this figure monetarily, this case will be used as an example of the need for malpractice "reform". Yet, we offered to settle years ago for a much lesser amount. Our lawyer told us, Insurance companies have refused to settle lately, the judgements are higher than they would have been in settlement, but the goal is reform. A few million here or there is a small price to pay to reduce the number of malpractice lawsuits permanently. I used to be in favor of reform: not anymore. The cards are stacked against the average citizen. Doctors do make mistakes that can destroy a person's health and ruin their life and their families' lives. We must find a way to discourage "frivolous" lawsuits while protecting the average honest person.
18 posted on 04/08/2002 12:58:08 PM PDT by nyconse
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Sloth
Doctors: reap what you sow... AMA... Medicins sans Frontiers... APA...

Those groups do not speak for most doctors, although you wouldn't know that judging by the media, who rushes to the more liberal physician's groups whenever they want a quote. Somehow we've reached a point where the right to sue for any reason for as much as possible is considered sacred, while at the same time many other health care rights are being taken away.

19 posted on 04/08/2002 1:01:01 PM PDT by Randjuke
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: jwalburg
This is great.

The problem is not nearly this bad in Indiana, where we have had reasonable reform of medical malpractice laws for the past fifteen years or so.

Lots and lots of refugee physicians from New York Pennsylvania, Massachusetts, and elsewhere, coming to Indiana to have a life.

Many suits are baseless and, most sickening of all, is the type of suit where some patient has some chronic disease state, often due to smoking, drinking, lack of exercise, or overeating, and he basically blames the MD for it.

Plus, as amazing as it seems, many patients are in total denial about how life is finite.

Once I had this elderly patient come in for an elective large abdominal surgery. I was going to do the anesthetic. Horrible lungs, room air sats of 85 percent (bad), bad hypertension, potassium of 2.9 (bad) and no clear reason for that.

I canceled the case and talked to the old lady, who was fairly angry.

"What do you mean, my lungs are no good. First I ever heard about it...Nobody ever told me that I was in bad physical condition...Yes, I used to smoke...I quit a year ago!"

That's what you're dealing with.

Totally disingenuous, passive aggressive patients.

Tell them a million times to quit smoking. They just smile at you.

Tell them to lose weight and get exercise. They just smile at you.

Tell them you want to do a rectal exam for occult blood, maybe detect cancer. They refuse. They don't want no rectal exam.

If you do a procedure on them, say, take out their gallbladder, you can find them on postop day 2 walking down the main hallway of the hospital to have a cigarette outside.

When you tell them that they are jeopardizing the circulation in the wound you just made, by smoking, they just chuckle.

You can warn them all about blood clots in the legs and heart attacks after surgeries, and how smoking makes all that more likely, they don't care.

This is the typical patient in an urban environment.

It is also the typical plaintiff in a lawsuit, who, probably, has no insurance and wants to cheese out of his hospital bill by suing the doctor because he got a wound infection following surgery.

Seen a lot of that type of thing. Makes you sick.

Every state should have a look at Indiana's system, by no means perfect, but better than this Texas crap.

Make it illegal for attorneys to have any contingency arrangements with medical plaintiffs. Let them bill several hundred dollars per hour as they will, but do away with the mega-incentive of a multi-million award, and their 30-40 percent take of it.

Make the loser pay in the lawsuit.

20 posted on 04/08/2002 1:05:04 PM PDT by caddie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 101-109 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson