Skip to comments.
U.N. Security Council votes 15-0 to demand Israel's withdrawal "without delay."
CNN
Posted on 04/04/2002 3:49:02 PM PST by newsperson999
Well it looks like we voted against Israel once again..I don't care what you say..Bush and the US are hypocrites when it comes to the war on Terrorism,you Bush lovers crack me up...I have lost major respect for the man today...You people are in denial
TOPICS: Breaking News; Israel; Your Opinion/Questions
KEYWORDS:
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 141-156 next last
To: newsperson999
2
posted on
04/04/2002 3:50:12 PM PST
by
cmsgop
To: newsperson999
Do you get paid to come on here and post that crap? Who do you work for?
3
posted on
04/04/2002 3:51:43 PM PST
by
Howlin
To: newsperson999
According to the other thread the US even sponsered the damn thing..what a shame!!...did the UN ever demand Arafat to crack down on terrorist or pass anything denoucing the suicide bombings?(I'm asking I don't know)
To: newsperson999
God told israel that He will bless those who bless Israel, and curse those who curse Israel. we're gonna deserve what we get. bush, the self proclaimed Christian, needs to open up his Bible to learn what to do.
5
posted on
04/04/2002 3:52:38 PM PST
by
pro-life
To: Howlin
what are you talking about its not crap it's breaking news..whats wrong? if I have something to say about the all mighty Bush I get flamed..First campaign finance then this
To: newsperson999
Bush and the US are hypocrites when it comes to the war on Terrorism,you Bush lovers crack me up Informative news article you've posted here. Of course, I guess that is part and parcel for CNN to display such bias.
To: newsperson999
For what it's worth, "without delay" was a victory of sorts, language substituted for the originally proposed "immediately". The former language might be interpreted as "without unreasonable delay" or "as quickly as is practicable", and that could mean at least several days. Israel wants to get things as quiet as it can get them by the time Powell arrives. I have gained respect for Bush. I interpret him as calling the Arabs bluff by giving Arafat one more (thousandth) last chance. If Arafat responds as he has before, then Bush can back Israel anyway. If Arafat turns out to be clever enough to go against his past record, then who knows? I doubt that he will.
8
posted on
04/04/2002 3:54:37 PM PST
by
Stirner
To: newsperson999
It was just announced on Fox News that Al Queda fugatives were in the west bank...
9
posted on
04/04/2002 3:54:56 PM PST
by
bert
To: Republican Wildcat
It's on their website and thats is what it says..
To: Howlin
Who do you work for?
Good Question
11
posted on
04/04/2002 3:55:57 PM PST
by
cmsgop
To: pro-life
Ditto for me!!
12
posted on
04/04/2002 3:57:11 PM PST
by
Clifdo
To: newsperson999
Actually, you mischaracterized Bush's speech today in your haste to get a thread up, so I'm not inclined to take your word for anything.
13
posted on
04/04/2002 3:57:16 PM PST
by
Howlin
To: newsperson999
UN Council backs Powell mission to Middle East |
|
|
|
|
UNITED NATIONS, April 4 (Reuters) - The U.N. Security
Council endorsed on Thursday President George W. Bush's
initiative to send Secretary of State Colin Powell to the
Middle East and also demanded Israel withdraw from Palestinian
cities "without delay."
The vote was 15-0, with the United States for the third
time in a month voting for a Middle East resolution after
blocking such measures for more than a year.
Even Syria, which had split from Arab nations by abstaining
or walking out of the council during the two previous votes,
approved Thursday's resolution, which the United States had
revised from a draft from Syrian Ambassador Mikhail Wehbe.
The resolution demands implementation "without delay" of
the council's resolution 1402, adopted last Saturday. It called
for a "meaningful cease-fire" and Israeli troop withdrawal from
Palestinian cities, including Ramallah where Palestinian
President Yasser Arafat is surrounded by Israeli tanks and
troops.
At the suggestion of U.S. Ambassador John Negroponte, it
welcomes the mission of Powell to the region next week as well
as efforts of envoys from Russia, the European Union and the
United Nations "to bring about a comprehensive, just and
lasting peace in the Middle East."
((UN bureau, +1 212 355 7424, fax +1 212 355 0143))
05 APR 2002 00:33:08
UN Council backs Powell mission to Middle East
14
posted on
04/04/2002 3:57:47 PM PST
by
RCW2001
To: newsperson999
It has the force of warm flatulence directed in Israel's direction.
15
posted on
04/04/2002 3:59:08 PM PST
by
Lent
To: cmsgop; terilyn
Here's the WHOLE story:
U.N. Endorses Powell Mideast Mission Thu Apr 4, 7:47 PM ETBy EDITH M. LEDERER, Associated Press Writer
UNITED NATIONS (AP) - The U.N. Security Council on Thursday unanimously endorsed the Mideast mission of Secretary of State Colin Powell (news - web sites) and demanded an Israeli withdrawal from Palestinian cities "without delay."
Diplomats said the council resolution would add weight to President Bush (
news -
web sites)'s effort to end the Mideast crisis. Secretary-General Kofi Annan (
news -
web sites) urged the international community to persuade Israel and the Palestinians to draw back from violence which is threatening the region.
Bush announced Thursday he was sending Powell to the Mideast next week. He urged Israel to halt its military incursions and start pulling its troops and tanks out of West Bank cities it entered in the past week in a search for Palestinian extremists.
The intesified U.S. mediation effort was announced while Security Council members were discussing an Arab-backed resolution demanding an immediate Israeli withdrawal from Palestinian cities, including Ramallah where Palestinian leader Yasser Arafat (news - web sites) is surrounded by Israeli tanks.
Frustrated over Israel's disregard of a council demand on Saturday to pull back its forces, Palestinian supporters demanded a new resolution including the word immediate which wasn't in Saturday's call for Israel's military withdrawal.
The United States objected to the word "immediate" because it has been pressing for a cease-fire to come ahead of an Israeli troop withdrawal, a position supported by Israel.
After Bush announced his new initiative, U.S. Ambassador John Negroponte proposed new language for the Arab-backed draft resolution demanding that Israel pull out its tanks and troops "without delay" and welcoming Powell's Mideast mission. Arab and non-aligned nations agreed to those words.
The resolution calls on "both parties to move immediately to a meaningful cease-fire; calls for the withdrawal of Israeli troops from Palestinian cities, including Ramallah; and calls upon the parties to cooperate fully with (U.S.) Special Envoy (Anthony) Zinni" to work to get a cease-fire and start negotiations for a political settlement.
It also expressed "grave concern" over the recent Palestinian suicide bombings in Israel and the attack on Arafat's headquarters in Ramallah.
The resolution adopted Thursday night demands the implementation of Saturday's resolution "without delay."
16
posted on
04/04/2002 4:00:07 PM PST
by
Howlin
To: Howlin
if you say so...you are in denial...the big news of the day was the bush told Israel to stop its mission and to pull out...not him calling having bad things to say about ARAFAT like he has done many times before...so tell me why would the US not only vote for the UN measure but sponser the thing?
To: newsperson999
I have to agree that a vote from us is a major insult. The UN should be demanding that Aarafat be taken to the gallows pole.
18
posted on
04/04/2002 4:00:57 PM PST
by
Mixer
To: cmsgop
This is what is says on the CNN website
U.N. Security Council votes 15-0 to demand Israel's withdrawal from Palestinian towns "without delay." Details to come.
To: newsperson999
The terrorists must be stopped, but do you think that Israel can be left to continue without restraint? Do you think Israel is without partial blame? If so, then you need to consult the UN map of the Palestiaian terrirories to see how extensive the Israeli occupation has been.
The terrorists must be stopped and Israel has the right to defend itself, but once the violence is contained, the ball will be in Israel's count to negotiate and then pull out of the occupied territories.
If the terrorism doesn't stop, then to hell with the Palis.
Obviously negotiations and comprises must be made for issues such as security, but in my opinion I have to say is "WHAT THE HELL IS ISREALI PUTTING ALL OF THESE SETTLEMENTS RIGHT IN THE MIDDLE OF PALESTINE TERRITORY"? Are they asking for it or what?
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 141-156 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson