Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Immigration Amnesty Passes House
Fox News ^ | 03/13/02

Posted on 03/13/2002 3:24:46 AM PST by Enemy Of The State

Edited on 04/22/2004 12:32:49 AM PDT by Jim Robinson. [history]

House Minority Leader Dick Gephardt said he would support the bill with the border security provisions.

WASHINGTON

(Excerpt) Read more at foxnews.com ...


TOPICS: Breaking News; Front Page News; Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: geopolitics; govwatch; michaeldobbs; nwo; wodlist
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 341-349 next last
Comment #41 Removed by Moderator

To: Tennessee_Bob
this law only applies to people who filed for residency. Nobody is talking about letting anyone come here for nothing.
42 posted on 03/13/2002 4:07:11 AM PST by arielb
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: Enemy Of The State

Bush is pushing Congress to pass a Section 245(i) extension before he goes to Mexico on March 22. Section 245(i) is rolling amnesty. Mexico is demanding amnesty as part of its goal of occupation and conquest of parts of America.

 

WHAT IS Section 245(i)?
Section 245(i) would restore a provision allowing illegal aliens to pay the INS $1000 and remain in the country, subject to only a cursory U.S. police record check, before receiving green cards. If Section 245(i) is not revived, these illegal aliens will instead be required to return to their country of origin where their application for an immigration visa would be subject to a far more vigorous home country background investigation. The legal procedure for entering the U.S. involves a background check performed in the country of origin to ensure that the immigrant or visitor does not pose a security threat. These laws were put in place for the precise reason of protecting our homeland and preventing a national tragedy like September 11th.


FINAL VOTE RESULTS FOR ROLL CALL 53

(Republicans in roman; Democrats in italic; Independents underlined)


      H RES 365     2/3 YEA-AND-NAY     12-MAR-2002   6:58 PM
      QUESTION:          On Motion to Suspend the Rules and Agree
      BILL TITLE: Providing for the concurrence by the House with amendments in the amendment of the Senate to H.R. 1885.

 

  YEAS NAYS PRES NV
REPUBLICAN 92 123   6
DEMOCRATIC 182 13   16
INDEPENDENT 1 1    
TOTALS 275 137   22


 

--- YEAS    275 ---
 
Abercrombie Hall (OH) Olver
Ackerman Harman Osborne
Allen Hart Ose
Andrews Hastings (FL) Otter
Armey Hastings (WA) Owens
Baca Hill Oxley
Baird Hinchey Pallone
Baldacci Hobson Pascrell
Baldwin Hoeffel Pastor
Becerra Holden Paul
Berkley Holt Payne
Berman Honda Pelosi
Berry Hooley Petri
Biggert Houghton Phelps
Bishop Hoyer Pomeroy
Blumenauer Hyde Portman
Boehlert Inslee Price (NC)
Boehner Israel Pryce (OH)
Bonilla Issa Quinn
Bonior Jackson (IL) Radanovich
Bono Jefferson Rahall
Borski John Rangel
Boswell Johnson (CT) Regula
Boucher Johnson (IL) Reyes
Brady (PA) Johnson, E. B. Reynolds
Brown (FL) Jones (OH) Rivers
Brown (OH) Kanjorski Rodriguez
Buyer Kelly Roemer
Calvert Kennedy (MN) Rogers (KY)
Cannon Kennedy (RI) Ros-Lehtinen
Capps Kildee Ross
Capuano Kilpatrick Rothman
Cardin Kind (WI) Roybal-Allard
Carson (OK) King (NY) Rush
Castle Kirk Ryan (WI)
Chabot Kleczka Sabo
Clay Knollenberg Sanchez
Clayton Kolbe Sanders
Clyburn Kucinich Sandlin
Condit LaFalce Sawyer
Conyers Lampson Schakowsky
Costello Langevin Schiff
Cox Lantos Scott
Coyne Larsen (WA) Sensenbrenner
Cramer Larson (CT) Serrano
Crowley Latham Shaw
Cummings LaTourette Shays
Cunningham Leach Sherman
Davis (CA) Lee Simmons
Davis (FL) Levin Simpson
Davis, Tom Lewis (CA) Skeen
DeFazio Lewis (GA) Skelton
DeGette Lofgren Slaughter
Delahunt Lucas (KY) Smith (NJ)
DeLauro Luther Smith (TX)
DeLay Lynch Smith (WA)
Deutsch Maloney (CT) Snyder
Diaz-Balart Maloney (NY) Solis
Dicks Markey Souder
Dingell Mascara Spratt
Doggett Matheson Stark
Dooley Matsui Stenholm
Doyle McCarthy (MO) Strickland
Dreier McCarthy (NY) Sununu
Dunn McCollum Tanner
Edwards McDermott Tauscher
Ehlers McGovern Tauzin
Ehrlich McHugh Terry
Engel McIntyre Thomas
English McKeon Thompson (CA)
Etheridge McKinney Thornberry
Evans McNulty Tiahrt
Farr Meehan Tiberi
Fattah Meek (FL) Tierney
Filner Meeks (NY) Towns
Fletcher Menendez Turner
Foley Millender-McDonald Udall (CO)
Ford Miller, George Udall (NM)
Fossella Mink Velazquez
Frank Mollohan Walsh
Frost Moore Waters
Gephardt Moran (VA) Watkins (OK)
Gibbons Morella Watson (CA)
Gilchrest Murtha Watt (NC)
Gillmor Nadler Watts (OK)
Gilman Napolitano Waxman
Gonzalez Nethercutt Weller
Goss Ney Wilson (NM)
Green (TX) Northup Woolsey
Green (WI) Nussle Wu
Grucci Oberstar Wynn
Gutierrez Obey  
--- NAYS    137 ---
 
Aderholt Goodlatte Pitts
Akin Gordon Platts
Bachus Graham Pombo
Baker Granger Putnam
Ballenger Graves Ramstad
Barcia Greenwood Rehberg
Barr Gutknecht Riley
Bartlett Hall (TX) Rogers (MI)
Bass Hansen Rohrabacher
Bereuter Hayes Roukema
Bilirakis Hayworth Royce
Blunt Hefley Ryun (KS)
Boozman Herger Saxton
Boyd Hilliard Schaffer
Brady (TX) Hoekstra Schrock
Brown (SC) Horn Sessions
Bryant Hostettler Shadegg
Burr Hulshof Sherwood
Callahan Hunter Shimkus
Camp Isakson Shows
Cantor Istook Shuster
Capito Jenkins Smith (MI)
Chambliss Jones (NC) Stearns
Clement Kaptur Stump
Coble Keller Stupak
Collins Kerns Sullivan
Combest Kingston Tancredo
Cooksey LaHood Taylor (MS)
Crane Lewis (KY) Taylor (NC)
Crenshaw Linder Thune
Cubin LoBiondo Thurman
Culberson Lucas (OK) Toomey
Davis, Jo Ann Manzullo Upton
Deal McCrery Visclosky
DeMint McInnis Vitter
Duncan Mica Walden
Emerson Miller, Dan Wamp
Everett Miller, Gary Weldon (FL)
Ferguson Miller, Jeff Weldon (PA)
Flake Moran (KS) Whitfield
Forbes Myrick Wicker
Frelinghuysen Norwood Wilson (SC)
Gallegly Pence Wolf
Ganske Peterson (MN) Young (AK)
Gekas Peterson (PA) Young (FL)
Goode Pickering  
--- NOT VOTING    22 ---
 
Barrett Eshoo Ortiz
Barton Hilleary Sweeney
Bentsen Hinojosa Thompson (MS)
Blagojevich Jackson-Lee (TX) Traficant
Burton Johnson, Sam Weiner
Carson (IN) Lipinski Wexler
Davis (IL) Lowey  
Doolittle Neal  



43 posted on 03/13/2002 4:07:53 AM PST by Enemy Of The State
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Comment #44 Removed by Moderator

To: arielb
Sure.... as long as you pay $1,000 for the privilege. How wonderful!
45 posted on 03/13/2002 4:09:25 AM PST by goldstategop
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: goldstategop
depends what kind of criminal. If the govt decided to ban guns and you were caught owning a gun, I'd support amnesty for you too :)
46 posted on 03/13/2002 4:09:54 AM PST by arielb
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: 2Trievers
What message does this send to all who enter legally and go through the process legit?

If they are here, already, then they should applaud this bill as well. The Object of lowering the threshold of scrutiny on this particular brand of illegals is to Clear out the INS backlog created by the previous administration.

Simply put, in deference to your gender, Which would you rather have the INS doing, (Choose one only)
A.Expanding to chase down those that are already here, and closely screen those coming in.
B. Staying the same size, and screwing around with people that may be illegal but have demonstrable ties to the community (Families/Jobs) and not being as effective screening those coming in.
C. Clearing the previous administrations backlog,and concentrating on those coming in; going forward.

47 posted on 03/13/2002 4:10:46 AM PST by hobbes1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: majordivit
especially immigration of third world hordes who hate western civilization

Oh really? Probably 90% of the immigrants come from countries that are predominatly Catholic and Christian. Are you going to tell me that the Catholic church hates Western civilization?

48 posted on 03/13/2002 4:11:19 AM PST by Dane
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

Comment #49 Removed by Moderator

Comment #50 Removed by Moderator

To: arielb
depends what kind of criminal. If the govt decided to ban guns and you were caught owning a gun, I'd support amnesty for you too :)

Same as when the speed limit was raised, millions of Americans weren't criminals anymore.

It comes down to whose ox is being gored and it seems that a lot of people on FR hold an animus to people who try to make a better honest life for themselves.

51 posted on 03/13/2002 4:15:07 AM PST by Dane
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

Comment #52 Removed by Moderator

To: arielb
You talking about an amnesty for wrongful conduct by the govt vis a vis an amnesty for wrongful conduct on the part of individuals. The two situations are far from comparable. Illegal entry into the United State is wrongful conduct on the part of an individual against this country. Its a danger and even people granted permission to enter this country by our government have been revealed to be dangerous. The last thing we need is to relax supervision over aliens in the U.S. If anything we need to watch all foreigners here with the greatest possible vigilance. Just think 9-11 to understand why we can no longer afford an amnesty for illegal aliens period.
53 posted on 03/13/2002 4:16:40 AM PST by goldstategop
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: VA Advogado
George Washington was an illegal alien? VA Advogado= History professor
54 posted on 03/13/2002 4:16:40 AM PST by sausageseller
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: Dane
people who try to make a better honest life for themselves.

There we go, back to honest. What do you propose we do with all the folks who have entered the country illegally??

55 posted on 03/13/2002 4:17:37 AM PST by Tennessee_Bob
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies]

To: VA Advogado
We are still a melting pot!

more like a witches brew ...

56 posted on 03/13/2002 4:20:08 AM PST by CFW
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

Comment #57 Removed by Moderator

Comment #58 Removed by Moderator

To: goldstategop
You talking about an amnesty for wrongful conduct by the govt vis a vis an amnesty for wrongful conduct on the part of individuals.

Just like the millions of Americans of who committed wrongful conduct by going faster than 55. Their "criminal" behavior was validated when the speed limit was raised.

Just using your logic to another everyday situation.

59 posted on 03/13/2002 4:20:36 AM PST by Dane
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies]

To: goldstategop
He came on a visa. It expired. That makes him an illegal immigrant. He is paying for residency paperwork. He's trying to be part of the system-not trying to hide from it. His wife is already part of the system. He is trying to do the right thing. Should we kick him out just because the INS is too slow? We let him in in the first place. It was legal. This isn't your stereotypical immigrant sneaking in a bus
60 posted on 03/13/2002 4:21:01 AM PST by arielb
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 341-349 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson