Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Easy Link to this article:

Enron Called Bush Cabinet Officers Before Bankruptcy
http://dailynews.yahoo.com/h/nm/20020110/ts/bush_enron_dc_7.html

1 posted on 01/10/2002 4:30:08 PM PST by MeekOneGOP
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: MeeknMing
Everybody INCLUDING WAXMAN took donations from Enron. Every company has the right to succeed or fail. With the exception of food or defense the GOV usually stays away from the situation. Evidently the Whitehouse did not pay special attention to Enron nor any other company. So far there is no problem as far as the Whitehouse is concerned.

It's terrible that the officers sold their stock first if it was illegal. I wait to hear what was illeagal. It does merit investigation though.

2 posted on 01/10/2002 4:38:26 PM PST by A CA Guy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: MeeknMing
". . .thousands of documents were destroyed. . ." Well, soon as Slickass clinton produces the thousands of missing emails and hands over all his records of Chi-Com nuclear secret payoffs and money they gave to Gore and the DNC, well, m-a-y-b-e a few scraps of Enron paper might be found. In the meantime, I'd rather not hear the demoncraps who covered and excused clintons' fat butt for 8 years open their yaps about THIS deal.
4 posted on 01/10/2002 4:42:43 PM PST by D2BAH
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: MeeknMing
Bush ordered reviews of pension and corporate disclosure rules of the company, which was a key contributor to the Bush presidential campaign. (Win McNamee/Reuters)

Excuse me whilst I call B$ on this part of the article.

7 posted on 01/10/2002 4:45:00 PM PST by Centurion2000
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: MeeknMing
Here is the thing that people is missing, Enron would be still in buisness if it had special favors from Bush! If a company was in buisness the Government, it would still be in buisness and making money. Enron went belly up! Plain and simple!
8 posted on 01/10/2002 4:45:15 PM PST by KevinDavis
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: MeeknMing
The media is so excited about this! They are trying their level best to tie Bush to this somehow. With headlines screaming that "Enron contacted Bush administration officials". Then you have to get a lot further down in the story before you realize that their contact with O'Neill at Treasury was near the END, not the beginning of their troubles. And the thing about Arthur Anderson destroying documents is HUGE, but again, it has nothing that I can see to do with Dubya!

The media wants so desparately for there to be something like Whitewater that they can tie on to Bush. Sorry folks, you're dealing with a different character than x42. For example, Dubya HAS character, x42 didn't.

9 posted on 01/10/2002 4:46:00 PM PST by SuziQ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: MeeknMing
Hey..... so what? Did these good ole boys kiss a** in both parties... I'll bet I know the answer.
10 posted on 01/10/2002 4:47:03 PM PST by pointsal
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: MeeknMing
What happened to the employees is terrible, but as Larry Kudlow said, there is a bright spot in this whole thing. It reminds us that we have a capitalist, free market, and when you screw up, you screw up, and you can't expect any one to help.
11 posted on 01/10/2002 4:49:04 PM PST by July 4th
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: MeeknMing
So what exactly is Bush charged with?
I still haven't seen anything.
14 posted on 01/10/2002 4:56:13 PM PST by Jorge
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: MeeknMing
The press is trying to equate Enron and Whitewater. There are too many differences to enumerate, but here are a few.

1. Whitewater was primarily HILLARY. They needed cash. They actively participated in a scheme to defraud people - including their friends. Many people in Arkansas never heard of Whitewater until it became a scandal.

2. Enron has been and is in the public eye for years. SEC, the press, stockholders, board of directors, anyone and everyone had access to their activities. GWB did not take any money from Enron except as a perfectly legitimate and legal campaign contribution - recorded in the proper fashion.

3. Whitewater had limited players - all taking a virtual vow of silence and covering up for each other - until Jim McDougall decided to spill the beans. But by that time, he was ill - making him the male equivalent of 'nuts and sluts' - except this was 'sick and senile'.

4. Someone at Enron will talk - probably a lot of someones. They will turn on each other like rats. There's not going to be a Susan McDougall - (not) pretty in orange - willing to go to the slammer as a favor for Bill.

5. GWB will cooperate, but he will not be a patsy. He also will not lie. This is where his straight-shooting type of talk will pay off. He will get the benefit of the doubt from all but the most rabid left-wingers, and of course, the press. In the past month, he has exhibited a very savvy approach to taking on his enemies in a field where his experience is fairly limited - politics. He can now take on his enemies on a playing field where his experience is considerable - energy.

6. The Dems will try to tar and feather GWB and Cheney with the 'BIG ENERGY' mantra. This is the one area where they will both have to be in-your-face defiant of the environmentalists.

7. Hillary tried to stonewall Whitewater - in the face of advice from nearly everyone. Why? She was guilty - she knows it and we know it. GWB is going to encourage the Enron investigation . Why? Because he's innocent - he knows it and WE know it - now we will have to wait for the investigation to prove it.

8. Is there a big mess w/r/t Enron? Of course, and probably a great deal of culpability on the part of the executives - if it can be documented. The SEC will be under scrutiny, too.

9. Remember how everyone hated Ken Starr because he was 'effeminate' and 'pasty' looking, etc.? Well, put a picture of Henry Waxman in your mind's eye. He's not going to glean a lot of support either. Who wants to watch him on TV all day? Rosa Lauro, Patty Murray?

10. I know I'm going to get flamed again (I do every time I bring this up), but GWB needs to replace Ari Fleischer. He cannot handle the press on this issue; they will chew him up. It's so bad now that I cringe every time I see him step up to the podium. Nice guy? Yes. Smart? Probably. Press Secretary? Bush can and should do better.

Terry Keenan (FOX) gave Bill O'Reilly an excellent summary the other night. She said savvy investors did not put a lot of money in Enron because they were trading broadband instead of dealing in energy. She said 'what does an energy company know about broadband? It made ME very suspicious and it should have made the employees very suspicious too.' O'Reilly admitted he had shares in Enron and he wanted a 'full investigation'. She suggested that if Enron was worthy of investigation, then so were many other companies.

There's way too much wailing and gnashing of teeth about this. GWB's got a lot at stake and I for one would never want to play poker with him. Besides, he's from TX and they just love a good fight. The Democrats may be biting off more than they can chew.

Bush & Waxman - wanted dead or alive. Wanna bet who wins?

22 posted on 01/10/2002 5:16:34 PM PST by SmartBlonde
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: MeeknMing
``The White House had knowledge that Enron was likely to collapse but did nothing to try to protect innocent employees and shareholders who ultimately lost their life savings,''

That's all you got, nostril-boy?

29 posted on 01/10/2002 5:52:48 PM PST by copycat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: MeeknMing
Enron/Clinton connections.
33 posted on 01/10/2002 6:18:13 PM PST by Salvation
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: MeeknMing
"I have never discussed with Mr. Lay the financial problems of the company."---George W. Bush, January 10, 2002

Or, to paraphrase: "I did not have financial discussions with that man, Mr. Lay."

Give me a break!

38 posted on 01/10/2002 8:15:36 PM PST by Judge Me
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: MeeknMing
Pardon my ignorance but, wasn't enron one of the companies that California couldn't pay during their energy crisis?
39 posted on 01/10/2002 9:02:35 PM PST by Big Guy and Rusty 99
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: MeeknMing
Enron’s Campaign Contributions, 1989-2001- Senate & House
41 posted on 01/11/2002 7:36:16 AM PST by angkor
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: MeeknMing
The Enron Scandal and Democrats website
42 posted on 01/12/2002 10:20:28 PM PST by anymouse
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson