Skip to comments.
The Snakes Win!
Posted on 11/04/2001 7:19:52 PM PST by Cyber Liberty
Bwaahaaa!
TOPICS: Announcements; Breaking News; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS:
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 141-160, 161-180, 181-200 ... 241-252 next last
To: Cyber Liberty
Congratulations D'Backs!!! Although many in my family are currently throwing a "Bronx Tantrum," I myself am happy.
Enjoy yourselves Phoenix, for it will be THE METS IN 2002!!!
To: L.N. Smithee
Left me qualify something. When I say what I think he should have done, I mean in baseball strategy what he should have done, what makes the most sense. Like Pinch Hitting for a pitcher when he is leading off the inning but is not going to pitch the next inning. That is a smart baseball move and Brenly did not do that.
162
posted on
11/04/2001 11:42:22 PM PST
by
jf55510
To: L.N. Smithee
Brenly's faith in Kim -- and the law of averages that was overwhelmingly in Kim's favor -- wasn't rewarded with victory, so people like you say he's stupid. You make some good points about second-guessing, but you didn't see Brenly use Kim in Game 7 (or even Game 6), did you? And this was after he loudly proclaimed that he still had confidence in Kim, and that he would "absolutely" use him again. When it came down to it, he chose using a starter who had pitched the game before over using him.
To: Citizen of the Savage Nation
Because its irrelevant. Who cares what happened 70-80 years ago when one team had about 80% of the resources of the league...it was stupid for Fox to even bring it up during the game. Out of the 4 franchises they mentioned, only the Packers record bears any significance because it was much harder to pull off. Then why aren't you more impressed with the Yankees winning three World Series in a row, and coming within inches of winning a fourth in a row, considering how much harder it is for a team to do so now?
To: inkling
But the Diamondbacks own the 21st!!! Congratulations on your team winning, but it looks like in the *two years* so far in this century, the Yankees won one year, and the D-Backs won one. It's a bit premature to say you own an entire century.
To: doug from upland
Hillary, a lifelong Yanks fan... Yeah...right!!
Besides...it is a well known fact that liberals are fans of the National League teams. That's how I tell if my neighbors are libs. Other indicators are 1) vanilla ice cream preference 2) The belief that Ike started the Vietnam war.
I'm surprized at all the D-Back fans on the FR. Need to check their IDs more carefully.
To: jays911
"..if the yanks had the strike zone.."
Horsefeathers! They Yawnks didn't lose because of strike calls - they lost because they were out-hit big time.
The Diamondbacks outscored New York 37-14 and held the Yankees to a .183 batting average, the lowest ever in a seven-game series.
That ain't a call problem - that is a major batting problem. The Diamondbacks trounced NY for one reason - they ran rings around them with the bat.
167
posted on
11/05/2001 1:45:48 AM PST
by
Ron C.
To: jays911
"..if the yanks had the strike zone.."
'rings around them with the bat.' - continued..
Game 6 on Saturday night, a 15-2 romp.
The problem NY had was simple. Banking on pitching, while ignoring hitting.
168
posted on
11/05/2001 1:50:23 AM PST
by
Ron C.
To: Ron C.
Yeah, as a Yankee fan, I'm not gonna sit here and blame the strike zone. The Yanks had a heckuva run, but the D-Backs beat our best (Mariano Rivera, who hadn't lost in a post-season closing situation for four years until last night) so you've got to tip their hat to them. Schilling and Johnson were awesome, but the Yankees bats being MIA didn't help, either (they struggled even against Anderson and Batista, and were only able to beat up on Kim.)
To: NYCVirago
"they struggled even against Anderson and Batista" That specifically was a big wake-up call for me - I kept yelling at NY hitters. It almost seemed like they were asleep at times.
NY will be back alright - and AZ has a fraction of the money. But, this was a real hoot. This time spunk beat bucks.
170
posted on
11/05/2001 2:12:03 AM PST
by
Ron C.
To: Diddle E. Squat
Jeter does make great plays. At SS, he also plays a brand of ball covering second base that draws muttered curses from opposition coaches on the little league fields of America. Arm hooking, leg whipping and hooking. I guess it's true what that moron Rome says, "If you aren't cheating you aren't trying".
It was very satisfying to see the D-Back runners take the game to Jeter finally.
171
posted on
11/05/2001 3:31:16 AM PST
by
kingh99
To: Cyber Liberty
D'backs Deflate D'bags!
Congrats 'backs! You won in spite of my rooting for you. The jinx has been temporarily bronken.
Best FRegards,
LoneGOPinCT
A jealous, disgruntled Red Sox fan
To: jays911
You were probably an equally classless winner when the yankees won 4 of the last 5 series. Steinbluster will probably fire the whole team now in a hissy fit.
To: The Raven
Calling people "liberals." Last refuge of a scoundrel.
To: Davea
Wonder what Andy MacFail is thinking about his former first baseman? Probably still not good enough to roam the first base line, what with Stairsy, Cooms, and the rest of that cast...
Comment #176 Removed by Moderator
To: cdwright
History has a ways to go just yet. Don't get ahead of yourself :)
To: Cyber Liberty
Great game ending a great Series.
178
posted on
11/05/2001 5:03:56 AM PST
by
Valin
To: jf55510
Now, now, JF--show a little class. Our team beat the Yankees fair and square and you know it.
(What is it about these Yankee fans? Why are so many of them such SORE LOSERMEN?????)
To: JoeA
Yankees: Founded, 1903. 38 Pennants in 98 years = 39% winning percentage. 27 World series wins = 71% winning percentage.
Those who live in the past do so because they have no future.
And BTW, you should check your calculator. 27 WS wins = 27% winning percentage, not 71%. Not that 27% is bad, but still... let's get the facts straight.
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 141-160, 161-180, 181-200 ... 241-252 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson