Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 09/20/2001 12:47:40 AM PDT by JohnHuang2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-34 next last
To: JohnHuang2
I was wondering how long it would take for this to come out in the open...
2 posted on 09/20/2001 12:51:04 AM PDT by Cold Heat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: JohnHuang2
No surprises here

.

3 posted on 09/20/2001 12:53:34 AM PDT by Elle Bee
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: _Jim
Well _Jim, care to explain what we really read here? You've stated emphatically that the government line on this incident was irrefutable. Now even the government is backing away from it's hard line.
4 posted on 09/20/2001 12:55:17 AM PDT by DoughtyOne
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: JohnHuang2, LSJohn, Judge Parker
heads up
7 posted on 09/20/2001 1:18:55 AM PDT by thinden
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: JohnHuang2
So... a bombing and not a feul tank explosion, and not a missile strike from either terrorists or the Rivero Theory?

A bombing still won't explain people seeing what looked like a missile.

Did they not really know what happened but had known of threats, and thus met in the situation room?

9 posted on 09/20/2001 1:27:46 AM PDT by piasa
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: JohnHuang2
JohnHuang2

you're the best....keep bumpin
10 posted on 09/20/2001 1:30:51 AM PDT by stylin19a
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: JohnHuang2
Bump (for later reading)
11 posted on 09/20/2001 1:37:15 AM PDT by Las Vegas Dave
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: JohnHuang2
This seems especially relevant in light of the threats made against Air Force One on 9/11. Since a hijacked jetliner would be just about impossible to use as a weapon against a moving target, the substantial and credible threat cited by Ari Fleischer had to be missile or a fighter jet. And we know it wasn't the latter.

And we know that Afghanistan, whatever dismal state it's in, has had the capacity to bring down airplanes with missiles fired from the ground for about 15 years now... Because we gave them Stinger missiles to bring down Soviet aircraft during the Reagan Administration. (Not questioning RR's wisdom at the time, it's just a fact.)

Seems reasonable to me to assume that the Taliban's pals bin Laden,and Saddam Hussein have the same capability. Probably for some time now.

13 posted on 09/20/2001 1:55:32 AM PDT by Sabertooth
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: JohnHuang2
Well which is it, a terrorist’s bombing or a US Navy test gone wrong?

I have not read of any lawsuits over this crash. Why in lawsuit happy America?

I have not read of any bulletin by Boeing to “Fix” the fuel tank problem. Why in lawsuit happy America would a major corporation leave itself open to further damages from a ‘major problem’ with the 747?

I have not read of any FAA directive to the airlines to ‘Fix’ the fuel tanks on 747s.

Why at this time did both Mr. Stephanopoulos and Mr. Kallstrom bring up TWA 800? What’s the connection to the terrorist’s WTC action and TWA 800? For those that do not believe in coincidence, the timing of the both these statements is very interesting. And not from ‘one source’ but two major Clinton administration players. Remember that TWA 800 was not a bombing, or missile strike according to the Clinton regimen, so now what’s the connection to a hijacking by terrorists?

Could this be both a terrorist’s action and a US Navy test gone wrong? Could some how the terrorists discovered the ‘Secret' US Navy test and flown TWA 800 into the test area to draw the missile away from the target and towards TWA 800? Or just a bad time for a missile test, which leads us back to coincidence!

More questions then answers, but it seems there is something rotten in Denmark. We need to pressure the sources to explain. This maybe the crack in the Clinton dam. Time to apply pressure! For five years the press may have been covering up this story to cover Clinton. What a story, the ‘free press’ kill a story about either the terrorist’s first blood of US civilians, or a major Clinton mistake that killed US civilians.

Either way, I want to know!

15 posted on 09/20/2001 2:21:03 AM PDT by Lockbox
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: JohnHuang2
Just went to the FAA’s web site and found the ‘AVIATION MAINTENANCE ALERTS‘ page. The links for the ‘View present and previous issues‘, ‘Search the database‘ and the ‘Instant M or D, Form (8010-4)‘ return ‘The page cannot be found’

Interesting, but I’ll try back later, maybe the computer system is down for maintenance!

18 posted on 09/20/2001 2:32:20 AM PDT by Lockbox
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: JohnHuang2
Stephanopoulos' future doesn't look very bright... Arkanicide or mental institution?
21 posted on 09/20/2001 2:41:34 AM PDT by Lion's Cub
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: JohnHuang2
Calm down, Freepers... they would have suspected it was a bombing at the time and Stephanopolous probably just slipped back into using the word because bombs and bombing were on everybody's mind Sept. 11th. This really is nothing.
24 posted on 09/20/2001 2:51:04 AM PDT by Grut
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: JohnHuang2
Safety Critical Bulletins. For a bulletin to be Safety Critical, which means it is published immediately, without union coordination, it must be: A subject matter that requires immediate implementation for safety of flight, e.g., emergency Airworthiness directives, special emphasis inspections, and responses to natural disasters, major accidents, national security or other catastrophic events.

GOLD! This database provides you with all Airworthiness Directives (ADs) issued by the FAA which are still in effect -- some date back to the 1940's. You can quickly view recently published data in this database. ADs can be searched by any word or group of words; or viewed by AD number, Make (Type Certificate Holder) or Model.

FAA database

keyword search ‘747 fuel center tank’ reply ‘No Documents Found‘

keyword search ‘747 fuel tank’ reply ‘No Documents Found‘

keyword search ‘fuel tank’ reply ‘No Documents Found’

HELP, what was the exact model of the 747 for flight TWA 800? I need to review the ‘Airworthiness Directives‘ by model.


25 posted on 09/20/2001 2:58:45 AM PDT by Lockbox
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: JohnHuang2
Verrrrrry interesting.
29 posted on 09/20/2001 3:04:37 AM PDT by Hugh Akston
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: JohnHuang2
George S. certainly could have made an innocent verbal mistake in the early hours after the September 11 attacks. Not saying he did, just saying he might have. There were lots of verbal gaffes in those first two days.

"Peter Jennings [talked] about President Bush being flown to Offutt Air Force Base in Nebraska and taken to the situation room on the base where he could keep in touch with Washington by teleconferencing. Stephanopoulos, implying that this was unnecessary ... "
Well, George, that would work just dandy AFTER the president got back safely to DC, wouldn't it? But he wasn't in DC, was he?

And Petah is taking so many backstabbing swipes at Bush I'm about ready to call him Petunia Jennings. He's acting like a 13-year-old girl who's trying to undercut the girl in her class who is adored by all the guys.

31 posted on 09/20/2001 3:07:40 AM PDT by GretchenEE
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: JohnHuang2
bttt
39 posted on 09/20/2001 5:22:25 AM PDT by willyb_jr
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: JohnHuang2, Grut, Lockbox
Add to the list, John Kerry (D-Mass.) in a radio interview with Don Imus a day or two later. He ran off a list of past terrorist attacks. Neatly tucked in the middle he included TWA Flight 800.
40 posted on 09/20/2001 5:34:27 AM PDT by Hatteras
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: JohnHuang2
Here we go again!
41 posted on 09/20/2001 5:39:30 AM PDT by verity
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: JohnHuang2
... the crash of TWA Flight 800 killed 230 people....

I don't think it was the crash that killed them.
42 posted on 09/20/2001 5:41:26 AM PDT by aruanan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: JohnHuang2
1) Pan AM 103 over Scotland

2) TWA Flight 800 off of New York

3) Egypt Air flight 900 off of New York.

4) Now the Twin Towers atrocity in New York using
American air carriers.

Commercial air travel has not been safe for Americans for quite awhile and the U.S. Government
knows this. No doubt in my mind that the Feds have been covering up this lack of security.
Particularly, the Clinton Administration.

43 posted on 09/20/2001 5:57:42 AM PDT by StormEye
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-34 next last

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson