Senator Charles Sumner was unavailable for comment.
Posted on 11/20/2025 2:35:36 PM PST by E. Pluribus Unum
Democratic senators clashed with Senate Majority Leader John Thune (R-S.D.) on the Senate floor Thursday when the GOP leader proposed a resolution to clarify that any damages won by Republican senators from lawsuits against the Department of Justice (DOJ) would go to the U.S. Treasury and not to the senators’ bank accounts.
Responding to complaints that empowering Republican senators to sue the Justice Department for millions of dollars is inappropriate or unseemly, Thune on Thursday proposed a compromise.
He suggested that colleagues approve a resolution by unanimous consent to clarify that any financial compensation awarded to senators would go to the U.S. Treasury, so that lawmakers would not be seen as enriching themselves.
“This would clarify that any damages awarded under this law would be forfeited to the United States Treasury. So, no United States senator could benefit,” Thune, who this week has steadfastly defended the provision that’s divided lawmakers, said.
Democrats immediately shot down the proposal, declaring it didn’t go far enough to address the appearance that the recently passed law had created a major conflict of interest.
Sen. Martin Heinrich (D-N.M.) said he wanted to make a “statutory change” to ensure that senators would not benefit financially and argued that the Senate should work with the House to address the “outrageous damage provisions.” He then objected to Thune’s proposal.
A provision tucked into the government funding bill passed last week empowers GOP senators surveilled by the Biden-era Justice Department to sue the federal government for hundreds of thousands or even millions of dollars in damages. It is retroactive to 2022, meaning it applies to senators whose phone records were sought by former special counsel Jack Smith.
(Excerpt) Read more at thehill.com ...
Dear FRiends,
We need your continuing support to keep FR funded. Your donations are our sole source of funding. No sugar daddies, no advertisers, no paid memberships, no commercial sales, no gimmicks, no tax subsidies. No spam, no pop-ups, no ad trackers.
If you enjoy using FR and agree it's a worthwhile endeavor, please consider making a contribution today:
Click here: to donate by Credit Card
Or here: to donate by PayPal
Or by mail to: Free Republic, LLC - PO Box 9771 - Fresno, CA 93794
Thank you very much and God bless you,
Jim
Senator Charles Sumner was unavailable for comment.
Why shouldn’t Senators who were spied on not be able to sue?
He deserved that beatdown...lol.
So, the Treasury gets the money from .... the Treasury aka US Taxpayer?
All of these Senators are beyond disgusting.
Pay AMERICAN citizens who’ve been wrongly spied upon, by DOJ, first.
Forget these grifters ... on BOTH sides.
Sue the corporations They are taking taxpayer money.
Yes, THAT was a figjt.
MA ans SC . The 2 Syates most responsible for the 1st Civil War.
I would much rather see those who signed off on the search warrants (whether prosecutor or judge), went without a warrant, or complied with an illegal request (I’m looking at you Verizon) get some hard jail time that the senators profit from this.
Campaign war chests are on life-support now that the USAID grift has been exposed and ended.
It wasn’t just Democrats.
Let them sue the individuals who engaged in the illegal acts, i.e. the prosecutors and judges.
Campaign war chests are on life-support now that the USAID grift has been exposed and ended.
It wasn’t just Democrats.
xxxxxxxxxxxx
HAR! True.
Because they didn’t care until it happened to them.
Thousands of people were spied on the same way. Families of January 6 participants, and the participants. President and candidate Trump and his acquaintances and cabinet members.
“Why shouldn’t Senators who were spied on not be able to sue?“
___________________
This has nothing to do with being able to sue, but rather who pays for it. They all can sue.
Congress was made aware of this in 2022. They didn’t care, until it was exposed that they too were spied on. Then all of a sudden it became important.
That’s when they carved out their own special treatment where the taxpayer would cover Congress’ legal fees to bring suit.
What about the legal fees for all the other U.S. citizens they spied on? Why don’t they get the same privileges?
This is typical DC corruption.
Was it a fight or an argument????
Maybe more like a spat.
You read my thoughts completely. Individuals, not institutions.
Thune is a total idiot.
If there WOULD be a fight, I’d like to see Jim Jordan punch Jerry Nadler in the nose...LOL
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.