Posted on 09/10/2025 6:39:23 PM PDT by TBP
2 facts about Charlie Kirk’s killer are VERY rare in the modern history of assassinations…
1) Firing ONLY one shot & it being perfect
2) Eluding capture until at least nightfall that day
I would be willing to bet that this was not this killer’s 1st rodeo, & he may be a “pro.”
People tend to overrate the "security net". We really are not that type of society yet.
Mr. GG2 who is a marksman says it looks like an attempted head shot but the perp forgot to aim a couple of inches high and ended up with a neck shot. He doubts its a pro.
We are disagreeing on this one. Im leaning toward it was a pro with a Difficult shot as Charlie was sitting under a canopy tent.
Supposedly Steven Crowder received an email from an ATF agent saying that an old Ma user with one expended cartridge was found wrapped in a towel in the woods. Now I see on Fox that the FBI is reporting finding a weapon in the woods. This feels like a narrative is being set up to me. My guess is we’ll never really know who shot Charlie Kirk. They’ll eventually bring out the usual drugged up nut job.
I'm here to tell you different. Besides, locks aren't that difficult to pick; and, you can bet your last dollar that there are no guards posted at roof access points.
Don’t even go there cuz... It was a simple observation FROM AN IMAGE THAT WAS SHARED RIGHT HERE ON THE FR. Why would you even go there and try to cause suspicion against me like that? That there is downright chickenshit stuff. That you would even think like that shows even Conservatives and fellow members here cannot turn their back on you or they might get stabbed or thrown under the bus.
I was going to apologize to you this morning but after that chickenshit accusation screw you...
“I’m here to tell you different. Besides, locks aren’t that difficult to pick; and, you can bet your last dollar that there are no guards posted at roof access points.”
There is a dirt/lawn hill that goes right up the side of the building to that rooftop level. I found it while looking at a picture someone HERE shared with EVERYONE here. It was in an outside link so I have no clue where it is now. I don’t have an image site account or I would link to my copy I downloaded.
LOL! That because these beautiful animals are clever and stealthy in the brush. We could never get close enough otherwise.
Although I do know a few old-timers that can successfully track and approach on the ground. The rest of us aren’t really that good in the woods.
The tippy top has changed ... but the subversive base hasn’t. Going underground just mean finding way to skirt the boss.
Is it a function of my ignorance to think that 30-06 Mauser is an awfully unusual chamber?
“Every Conservative speaker cannot afford a Presidential level of security.”
Check the statistics. I bet more “non-speaker” activists are assassinated than “speakers”. I knew a long string of activists in Chicago who were assasinated. Only one, Mike Baretto, was known for his speaking ability. The rest were troops in the trenches. But their death does not get the MSM attention.
“Every Conservative speaker cannot afford a Presidential level of security.”
Check the statistics. I bet more “non-speaker” activists are assassinated than “speakers”. I knew a long string of activists in Chicago who were assasinated. Only one, Mike Baretto, was known for his speaking ability. The rest were troops in the trenches. But their death does not get the MSM attention.
“Every Conservative speaker cannot afford a Presidential level of security.”
Check the statistics. I bet more “non-speaker” activists are assassinated than “speakers”. I knew a long string of activists in Chicago who were assasinated. Only one, Mike Baretto, was known for his speaking ability. The rest were troops in the trenches. But their death does not get the MSM attention.
“Every Conservative speaker cannot afford a Presidential level of security.”
Check the statistics. I bet more “non-speaker” activists are assassinated than “speakers”. I knew a long string of activists in Chicago who were assasinated. Only one, Mike Baretto, was known for his speaking ability. The rest were troops in the trenches. But their death does not get the MSM attention.
Goto reply #128
click link
go to timeline 1:29
you can see the grassy slope up to roof.
I do not know how to find the 3d imagery in that video.
I recall a line delivered by Jeff Daniels in the movie "Arlington Road":
"We don't want others. We want one name, and we want it fast, because it gives us our security back".
The point being the media and public tend to focus on a single perpetrator to make sense of a attack and to reassure themselves that it was an isolated incident, not the result of a larger, more frightening conspiracy.
Thank you...
Based on what I heard over and over while investigating the videos that was not the shot report of a 30-06. Too high pitched of a “crack” and not loud enough. A 30-06 sounds more like a twelve gauge shotgun report. There is no “crack” to it, it is a solid lower pitched “boom” like a cannon.
I just saw another video that confirms your points.
Who ever was gunning for Charlie found this nightmare of a location for this event.
Still hard to believe no one saw him before hand with all those people there.
But then again he could have went there at 2am and just waited .
You dont have to be militarized or paranoid to use a drone for security surveillance and recording purposes, especially for an area this large and a crowd this big. Also given the speaker wears a bullet resistant vest wherever he went to speak, kinda says something.
Why would you even go there and try to cause suspicion against me like that?
/
WTH are you talking about ?
Suspicion of what ?
You were right about the accessibility being easy peasy.
My comment was more about those investigating than it was about you.
Why the paranoia ?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.