Click here: to donate by Credit Card
Or here: to donate by PayPal
Or by mail to: Free Republic, LLC - PO Box 9771 - Fresno, CA 93794
Thank you very much and God bless you.
Posted on 09/01/2025 3:00:16 AM PDT by Tom Tetroxide
A bombshell peer-reviewed study (https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12381369/) out of Italy has just shattered the narrative peddled by Big Pharma, corporate media, and government health bureaucrats.
For the first time, a population-wide cohort of nearly 300,000 people tracked over 30 months has revealed that the so-called “safe and effective” COVID-19 shots are linked to alarming spikes in multiple forms of cancer.
Researchers followed every resident aged 11 and older in Italy’s Pescara province from June 2021 through December 2023, examining hospital records and adjusting for age, sex, prior health conditions, and even prior COVID infection.
The researchers allegedly found that those who received at least one vaccine dose had a much lower risk of dying from any cause compared to the unvaccinated, and this protective effect was even stronger in people who had three or more doses. ADVERTISEMENT
When looking at cancer, the picture was less clear. People who had been vaccinated appeared somewhat more likely to be hospitalized with a new cancer diagnosis than those who were unvaccinated, particularly for cancers of the breast, bladder, and colon.
However, this increased risk was only evident in people who had never been infected with COVID-19, and it disappeared—or even reversed—when the analysis required at least twelve months to pass between vaccination and a hospital admission for cancer.
Hospitalizations for cancer were 35% higher in vaccinated individuals versus the unvaccinated (HR 1.23). The link was strongest in men and in those with no prior COVID infection. Overall Cancer Risk: +23% after just one dose Breast Cancer: +54% risk after vaccination Bladder Cancer: +62% increased risk Colorectal Cancer: +35% increased risk
Even after multiple doses, the risks remained elevated across the board.
The authors noted that vaccinated individuals are usually healthier, wealthier, and more likely to get preventative care, a phenomenon called the “healthy vaccinee bias.”
If anything, the numbers should have shown lower cancer rates. Instead, cancers surged. That means the real danger could be far worse than what the data shows.
Doctors and whistleblowers have been warning for years about sudden, aggressive cancers appearing in otherwise healthy people after the jab.
This study, alongside more than 100 other peer-reviewed papers, confirms the link between mRNA injections and deadly cancer pathways. A new medical term has even been coined: COVID-19 Vaccine-Induced “Turbo Cancer.”
More from Focal Points:
THE FIRST FORMAL SIGNAL: INCREASED CANCER RISK
Despite strong “healthy vaccinee bias” (explained below), the study still found multiple increases in cancer hospitalizations among vaccinated individuals. Overall cancer risk:
+23% increased risk after ≥1 dose (HR 1.23, 95% CI 1.11–1.37) (statistically significant) +9% increased risk after ≥3 doses (HR 1.09, 95% CI 1.02–1.16) (statistically significant)
BY CANCER SITE (Hazard Ratios Converted to % Increased Risk)
Breast cancer
+54% with ≥1 dose (HR 1.54, 95% CI 1.10–2.16) (statistically significant) +36% with ≥3 doses (HR 1.36, 95% CI 1.08–1.72) (statistically significant)
Bladder cancer
+62% with ≥1 dose (HR 1.62, 95% CI 1.07–2.45) (statistically significant) +43% with ≥3 doses (HR 1.43, 95% CI 1.08–1.88) (statistically significant)
Colon-rectum cancer
+35% with ≥1 dose (HR 1.35, 95% CI 1.01–1.80) (statistically significant) +14% with ≥3 doses (HR 1.14, 95% CI 0.96–1.36) (not statistically significant)
Hematological cancers (leukemia/lymphoma)
+31% with ≥1 dose (HR 1.31, 95% CI 0.96–1.79) (not statistically significant) +7% with ≥3 doses (HR 1.07, 95% CI 0.89–1.29) (not statistically significant)
Uterine cancer
+77% with ≥1 dose (HR 1.77, 95% CI 0.76–4.13) (not statistically significant) +20% with ≥3 doses (HR 1.20, 95% CI 0.73–1.96) (not statistically significant)
Ovarian cancer
+71% with ≥1 dose (HR 1.71, 95% CI 0.60–4.82) (not statistically significant) +86% with ≥3 doses (HR 1.86, 95% CI 0.68–5.12) (not statistically significant)
Thyroid cancer
+58% with ≥1 dose (HR 1.58, 95% CI 0.84–2.99) (not statistically significant) -3% with ≥3 doses (HR 0.97, 95% CI 0.67–1.45) (not statistically significant)
Prostate cancer
+1% with ≥1 dose (HR 1.01, 95% CI 0.68–1.49) (not statistically significant) -3% with ≥3 doses (HR 0.97, 95% CI 0.76–1.23) (not statistically significant)
Lung cancer
-10% with ≥1 dose (HR 0.90, 95% CI 0.68–1.18) (not statistically significant) -7% with ≥3 doses (HR 0.93, 95% CI 0.79–1.11) (not statistically significant)
WHAT THIS MEANS
The strongest, statistically significant increases were found for breast, bladder, colorectal, and overall cancer risk. Nearly all other cancer sites also showed an upward trend, though not statistically significant due to wide confidence intervals. Only lung and prostate cancers showed no evidence of increased risk.
This pattern suggests a real signal that is partially obscured by confounders and limited follow-up time.
Read the data below:
https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/wp-content/plugins/pdfjs-viewer-shortcode/pdfjs/web/viewer.php?file=https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/08/covid-19-vaccination-all-cause-mortality-and-hospitalization-for-cancer_-30-month-cohort-study-in-an-italian-province-pmc.pdf&attachment_id=1445936&dButton=true&pButton=true&oButton=false&sButton=true&editButtons=true&pagemode=none&_wpnonce=a6c5147a8c
|
|
Click here: to donate by Credit Card Or here: to donate by PayPal Or by mail to: Free Republic, LLC - PO Box 9771 - Fresno, CA 93794 Thank you very much and God bless you. |
safe AND effective
Population Reduction...
And Fauci laughs all the way to the Bank
Ping
Please tell me who here believes that Big Pharma, corporate media, and government health bureaucrats will ever be held accountable on this Earth.
As far as I’m concerned, they can all ROT IN HELL FOR ETERNITY!!
Anecdote: My neighbor, 78 and vaxxed to the max developed bile duct cancer and was gone in 4 months. I had never heard of bile duct cancer before.
Safe and effective my ass...
[[People who had been vaccinated appeared somewhat more likely to be hospitalized with a new cancer diagnosis]]
Then lower it says:
[[Hospitalizations for cancer were 35% higher in vaccinated individuals versus the unvaccinated]]
So an INCREASE in hospitalization for cancer among vaccinated who got cancer after getting vaxxed, to the tune of 1 in every three people, is “Somewhat more likely”?
Seems like the article is intentionally trying to down0lay the seriousness of the cancer issue caused by vaccines!
Thanks for posting. RIP DG, DF, DW.
"I came up with a vaccine, with three vaccines all are very, very good.”
"I was able to get something approved that, you know, that has proven to have saved a lot of lives. Some people say that I saved 100 million lives worldwide."
He’s said a few knuckeheaded things. Still voted for him six times.
Remember when certain folks wanted to arrest us for “misinformation” when we first started noticing how some of the folks we knew started suffering after the jabs?
Walls are closing in. But will the guilty pay for it?
Sod off Troll.
He did save lives by preventing the jabs from being made mandatory.
Maybe the mRNA hangs out in certain kinds of tissues and upsets/interferes with the regular cell life RNA processes the regulate normal cell life and death.
Cancer is normal cell reproduction gone amok.
Not sure I understand your post ... Why was it not fixed ...
He treated his cancer with CONVENTIONAL “standard of care” aka chemo.
Is that what you mean? It wasn’t fixed because he treated with chemo (slash and burn standard of care)?
Just trying to get your point. Thx.
We lost my cousins wife to a turbo cancer last February. Now suddenly he’s got some rare blood cancer with no treatment. They trusted their doctor. Don’t do that.
Thank you ... that one likes to let his TDS quips slip out, on threads like these.
It’s been explained, ad nauseam, on FR, why/how these jabs were rolled out by PDJT, who - at the time - trusted the so-called experts.
Is he on the Makis/Marik protocol of repurposed (actually safe and effective!) meds?
Prayers up.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.