Posted on 07/12/2025 9:48:57 PM PDT by Kevin C
President Donald Trump on Saturday defended Attorney General Pam Bondi as doing a "fantastic job" after she came under fire from some Trump supporters over the Department of Justice’s handling of the Jeffrey Epstein files.
"What's going on with my ‘boys’ and, in some cases, ‘gals?' They’re all going after Attorney General Pam Bondi, who is doing a FANTASTIC JOB," Trump wrote in a lengthy post on Truth Social on Saturday. "We’re on one Team, MAGA, and I don’t like what’s happening."
He referred to Epstein as the "guy who never dies," adding, "For years, it’s Epstein, over and over again."
He continued to question why people were "giving publicity to Files written by Obama, Crooked Hillary, Comey, Brennan, and the Losers and Criminals of the Biden administration."
(Excerpt) Read more at foxnews.com ...
President Trump should approach this entire situation with a GREAT DEAL of CAUTION simply because this complete ISSUE is VERY IMPORTANT to the MAGA-Base.
It's IMPORTANT to the MAGA-Base to VALIDATE that we still HAVE a "JUSTICE SYSTEM"... They want to see PROSECUTIONS.. WITHOUT that type of VALIDATION, Mr. Trump's VALIDITY could COLLAPSE UNEXPECTEDLY.
It’s ok for Trump to criticize Bondi.
Epstein didn’t kill himself.
Bondi created problems
As one of the MAGA base I disagree BUT THANKS FOR YOUR CAPITALS.
Bondi is tough and loyal. I don’t care if she is transparent or stonewalls you because you have no stake in the Epstein saga but you do have a stake in Bondi’s success. Epstein is nothing more than dog shit on a lot of shoes.
Bondi is a liar.
But, he is the still the best we have.
Pam Bondi repeatedly lied on Faux News.
Bondi is the reason for the Epstein Disaster.
He had a great life in part because he fed the Epstein story without knowing jack shit about it, just throwing out red meat for engagement.
Then he got in and sounded like a jackass carrying the company line. Then a hissy fit and ultimatum
Agreed.
I agree with Roger Stone’s take he gave at the TPUSA conference.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Di2TOcEQ7ZM
How many investigations have to be done before people accept the findings as they are and not what they want it to be?
How many times did Bondi lie?
In or out of context?
I don’t know what you mean about context.
> 100% reading the room, wrong!
> Come on Trump, wake up!
I’m just shaking my head at all this. I am so very sad. We need answers. We need justice for these raped children, and PUNISH the powerful scumbags who have committed these despicable crimes! Why is our President doing this?????????
> I agree with the President. There are many other issues in need of attention that are strategic. As I mentioned before, even if we have the list, nothing can be done with it. All it shows simply person A, B and C were in the party. Unless there’s a photo or video of them engaging sexual activities with minors or foreign agents, what can the list do?
Blondi said there were tons of videos of children being raped. Now there aren’t? If there is video, then there is definitely someone on that video committing these despicable crimes. Do the videos exist or don’t they?
I don’t know about you, but exposing POWERFUL RAPISTS OF CHILDREN is very, very important! These children are important! Should we pay attention to other issues... YES. But to completely abandon the pursuit of justice for these children? WHY?
> So, do you prosecute this one pedophile at a time?
Why not? At least, expose the powerful pedos! What’s wrong with that?
Was Bondi lying then or is she lying now?
Regardless of which one it is—she needs to be gone.
Regardless of the facts on the ground this is a high alert public relations disaster.
I have a question for any of you law dogs.If someone was recorded having sex with an underage person in a private setting and the person doing the recording is now dead, can that recording be used against the perp or could it be argued that the recording is inadmissible as evidence? This might be the reason nothing is being released. Private recording, private property, no consent to recording. Just a thought as to what might be happening in decision making.
Epstein is the prime suspect of criminal activity, and he is dead. I would imagine there are some very high-profile names associated with the allegations made against Epstein - just like everyone else believes - but the DOJ would have a difficult time prosecuting ANYONE with Epstein being dead. They could all claim they had no idea what was going on and that they just stumbled into the situation. Again, the main perpetrator is deceased, and without him, the DOJ decided they cannot/should not proceed.
Taking all of that into account, why release a bunch of speculative information when there is no way to prove what happened or didn't happen? Thinking like a lawyer here.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.