Posted on 07/11/2025 10:12:03 AM PDT by george76
You knew in your heart of hearts from the very beginning.
Even as you watched those first flames take the first houses and then leap up through the canyons and down through the hillsides, through the breaks, even jumping PCH to gobble up the houses tucked next to the highway itself - those uniquely SoCal structures sandwiched between the asphalt and that big, blue Pacific surf...you knew.
You knew would never see it again, for all the gargoyle grin assurances of the mayor who couldn't be bothered to be there when the flames broke out. For all the slickster, huckstering, faux promises of a governor faking phone calls as he skittered like a cockroach from angry, heartbroken residents who only wanted answers.
You knew.
You knew when comedian turned prophet Adam Corolla went on an epic rant from a hotel room desk, a fire refugee himself waiting on word whether he had a home or not, telling you then and there if your home was gone, it was gone for good.
Because Mayor Karen Bass, Governor Gavin Newsom, and the soul-crushing machinery of the State of California had the will and the power to ensure you would never rebuild, one way or the other.
...
And you knew he was right.
That sick feeling only grew as months passed. The empty words of a nervous-as-a-cat Bass, defensively deflecting Donald Trump's directions to make residents as whole as possible as soon as possible, hang in the air still.
...
In hard-hit Altadena alone, the rebuilding process six months later is sucking the lives and hope out of people.
And every dime they ever had.
...
Addressing the concerns of homeowners at a recent community meeting, Barger told them, “You have lost so much, you shouldn't have to worry about permitting fees getting in the way of rebuilding your home. For most families, these fees may have exceeded $20,000. That's a barrier we cannot allow to stand.”
The deferral of fees only applies to people who lived in their own single-family homes before the fire. It does not apply to non-owner-occupied rental properties, multi-family housing units or commercial structures.
The county estimates that if 60% of homeowners in Altadena and elsewhere in unincorporated Palisades rebuild, it would amount to $84 million in building permit fees.
Permitting is only one hurdle. For most, state and local building codes have changed in the decades since many of these homes were originally built, meaning the house has to have changes and extras that insurance covering a like-to-like rebuild does not account for.
“It adds expenses that we didn’t expect. Like, solar is required on all new builds, and so is the easement from the property line. It’s got to be five feet now and ours was only three,” says Toomey, as she stands under a backyard oak tree that survived.
“And insurance doesn’t pay for that stuff. That’s on us,” Silvernail adds.
Soil sampling is now required, and that tacks another $5000-$8000 onto the process.
The very long and tedious process, which is beginning to look as if it's specifically designed to soak as much money out of the homeowner as possible before they give up in disgust and move elsewhere.
There has been only an unconscionable 44 building permits approved in LA County since the fires.
...
But the process is still slow. As of midday July 1, 2025, the LA County Permitting Progress Dashboard showed 890 rebuild applications in the Eaton Fire area, but only 44 building permits have been issued, taking an average turnaround of about 10 weeks to get through the process.
And speed matters. A survey of fire victims found that the longer it takes to rebuild, the more likely it is people won’t move back.
“So even folks that fully intend to move back today, if this process, either through permitting or financing or insurance, takes more than three years, the percentage of people that want to move back drops to like 50%,” Kawahara says.
Those are the single-family homeowners' travails.
Back in February, I wrote about a new Los Angeles ordinance that had come into effect, requiring low-income housing to be erected, replacing apartment buildings that were lost.
What that meant to fire victims who'd lost their rental homes was they might never have a home to return to if the landlord rebuilt their building and they now earned too much to make the qualifications for the low-income threshold.
In effect, LA County would be making them homeless.
...
This also means that “affordability” is likely to be determined based on citywide median household income that is half the Palisades amount.
If all units in RSO buildings must be replaced with units affordable to lower-income households making up to about $80,000 per year for a family of four, rents would be about $2,000 per month. For the units in newer, non-RSO buildings that must be affordable to very-low-income households making up to about $50,000 for a family of four, rents would be about $1,300 per month.
Before the fire, a market-rate two-bedroom apartment cost between $4,000 and $5,000 per month, requiring a monthly annual household income of $160,000 to comfortably afford, which means that the RPO replacement requirements could significantly alter the area’s demographics — and even bar higher earning residents from renting out homes at their old addresses.
So, conceivably, if you once rented a lovely apartment in the area and this ordinance as written is in effect for the rebuild, you will now make too much money to return to your former home, even if it's the same landlord rebuilding on the exact same address.
The state's oleaginous chief executive delivered the coup de grâce to former renters and landlords yesterday.
In a self-congratulatory moment, Newsom grandly announced his intentions to bring 'multifamily low-income housing development' to Pacific Palisades, Eaton, and Altadena, creating a more 'resilient and - keyword here - equitable Los Angeles.'
Six months after the devastating Palisades and Eaton fires, California Gov. Gavin Newsom unveiled $101 million in funding Tuesday for “multifamily low-income housing development” that will “contribute to a more equitable and resilient Los Angeles." The priority is for “geographic proximity to the fire perimeters of the Eaton, Hughes, and Palisades fires.”
Earlier this year, The Center Square broke news that California state law and a local Los Angeles ordinance require fire-destroyed rent-protected housing — which includes all apartments in the city built before October 1978 — be replaced with low-income housing. Because the affordability requirements use county-level income data, not more local incomes, definitions for “low” and “very low” income housing reflect much lower incomes than the norm for the affluent Palisades community.
“Thousands of families – from Pacific Palisades to Altadena to Malibu – are still displaced, and we owe it to them to help,” said Newsom in a statement. “The funding we’re announcing today will accelerate the development of affordable multifamily rental housing so that those rebuilding their lives after this tragedy have access to a safe, affordable place to come home to.”
Those who actually are 'rebuilding their lives' because of the fires are not going to qualify for what is being rebuilt.
You just knew.
....
And you just know that every homeowner who finally walks away is one more chalk mark on the progressive tote board to remake an equitable city out of what they see as the privileged life in those once beloved old communities dotting the hillsides.
Someone said they would hate to assign sinister motives to all this, but it really looks bad.
I don't have any problem assigning sinister motives to all of it, particularly knowing who the leading players are.
...
No one should doubt for a minute that this hasn't been the contingency plan all along, for any Los Angeles area that 'burns' or suffers a 'natural disaster.' Like a fire that has no reservoir to quench the flames, or prescribed burns to mitigate them before they break out, or a fire department funded, trained, and ready to go in chaparral that burns in the blink of an eye.
When there are people setting fires in that tinder-dry wilderness constantly.
....
You know they're in the societal transformation business, and rebuilding your precious private homestead isn't any part of that master plan.
You just knew what was coming.
What I don't know is when people finally learn.
Don’t forget Hawaii.
Our little town was hit by a tornado over a year and a half ago. I am still fighting the joint underwriters to repair the damage to my home. Still going through the “process” to satisfy my homeowner policy which also states I have up to 2 years after the date of damage to file any suit in the courts. I suspect they have an eye on that time frame as well.
Effing criminals...
Adam Checks Out the Palisades 🔥 The Adam Carolla Vlog
22:33
Adam Carolla
470K subscribers
462,530 views
Premiered May 22, 2025
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TriaE2bhCmo
Why Are There No Digital Records for Karen Bass during Palisades Fire?
9:32
Adam Carolla
470K subscribers
76,425 views
May 21, 2025
Months after the wildfires scorched a path of destruction through several Los Angeles County communities, the city of L.A. says no digital communications exist for the acting mayor. Adam breaks it down.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OBBsbVDpWIw
Think about this. The section 8 housing will be built near the edges of the fires. If another fire starts that housing will be very likely to burn as well due to the proximity of brush still unburned. Fiendish plan.
Move over Lahaina...
...more land grab to be done and residents to be moved out.
I hear L.V is just like Hawaiia now, sans beaches .
Take the insurance money and move somewhere else.
Welcome to the party Pacific Palisades! They’re a bit late.
The CA Communist left have eff’d over the entire state. It seems those in the Palisades are just figuring out what the rest of us have known for decades.
They pat themselves piously on the back and mouth such platitudes as "the law is the law".
IN BASS’ MIND-—SHE HAS EVERYTHING ON A VERY FAST TRACK
EVERYTHING WITH HER & NEWSCUM IS SEMANTICS
Maybe ten low income dwellings max by the time the cronies get their cuts.
Hardly enough to house more than a handful of nannies, landscapers and drug dealers to the stars and definitely not enough to make any serious demographic impact.
Do you also love other annoying things or just this one? :-)
Snort!
All those lib$ that voted for this in effect just $crewed themselves real good.
As a residential renovator, I saw this coming from miles away and they aren’t even close to the nightmare to come. Heads will explode as anger builds over the next two years. They can facilitate the permits, but the soil thing is a problem. If that’s not done correctly, and approved, it will be far worse. A large handful of the victims will be “formerly wealthy” and it’s amazing that, although mostly liberals were presumably affected, political heads have not yet been collected and used as bowling balls.
Thanks for posting. BUMP.
Just remember when you allow lawyers to make and carry out your laws . . .
The process will be your punishment and will be their fortune.
Things are simmering like France in 1792 before the people got tired of all the stalling and took the law into their own hands.
Oleaginous - that’s the word of the day!
Going to be hard to do.
These rules are applied to large scale developers working on the planned community/sub division level.
They do not apply to single family home owners trying to rebuild after the Bass/Newsome disaster. Bass is up for re election next year and if she gets re elected after all the destruction she has brought upon the city then LA is going to deserve everything it gets.
The Communist left destroyed the entire state, made it unaffordable and unlivable. Not hard to do at all. It’s obviously easy for them!
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.