Posted on 06/25/2025 9:21:38 AM PDT by CFW
The Department of Justice (DOJ) sued the entire federal district court of Maryland on Tuesday.
The lawsuit challenges a standing order issued by the court to automatically block the deportation of any illegal migrant who files a petition for writ of habeas corpus. It names all 15 judges, as well as the court clerk, as defendants.
“Defendants’ automatic injunction issues whether or not the alien needs or seeks emergency relief, whether or not the court has jurisdiction over the alien’s claims, and no matter how frivolous the alien’s claims may be,” the lawsuit states. “And it does so in the immigration context, thus intruding on core Executive Branch powers.”
Chief Judge George L. Russell III, an Obama appointee, issued a standing order in May to block the administration from “removing Petitioners in such cases from the continental United States or altering their legal status.” The order remains in place until 4:00 pm on the second business day after a migrant files, unless extended by the judge.
(Excerpt) Read more at dailycaller.com ...
But they CAN be sent to ALLIGATOR ALCATRAZ!!!
Habeas corpus applies unless you were in Washington, DC on January 6, 2020.
For all those bitching about AG Blondie... this is what she’s been working on.
I’m hoping this is mute after tomorrow’s SCOTUS ruling on ‘injunctions’ - and, the Chief Justice could have signaled a favorable ruling in the Presidents favor when he allowed 3rd country deportations to resume over the weekend
Law school would have been so much easier with Grok.
This is good.
They started lawfare. They should suffer lawfare.
Even if this doesn’t win, make them fight for it.
Why would you hope Grok would give a different reply? The very point of habeas corpus is to allow someone to challenge their detention. If you deny it to anyone, it can easily be denied to you. Witness the J6 defendants. The fact that it has been denied to them should make you very skeptical of any attempt to deny it to anyone. If you want to deny it to illegal aliens, then how could a valid U.S. citizen challenge their deportation. I have family members who are U.S. citizens, having come to America the right way, who could easily be arrested for being an illegal alien because of their appearance and accent. If they don’t have the opportunity to assert their citizenship before being deported, that would be a grave miscarriage of justice. We on Free Republic should be the ones most protective of habeas corpus.
They tried to handcuff the president. I wonder if the judges can be removed if found that their rulings are unconstitutional or illegal. A judge who breaks the law should not be able to rule.
“AI” isn’t worth spit.
All it is is a conglomeration of known things out there in the intrawebs. There’s no ‘Intelligence” to it at all.
Or close thereabouts.
That would be fartsensitive as well as others.
likely, at most, a judge ruling unconstitutional or illegally will at maybe say “oops! my bad” and keep right on judging as they wish.
Under U.S. federal law, habeas corpus applies to illegal aliens in certain circumstances, but its application is subject to significant limitations. Under 28 USCS § 2241, federal courts have jurisdiction to entertain habeas corpus petitions, including those filed by aliens, unless specifically restricted by statute. However, 8 USCS § 1252 imposes jurisdictional limits on courts regarding the review of removal orders and other immigration-related decisions, except in specific cases where constitutional or statutory claims are raised. For example, the Supreme Court has held that aliens may seek habeas corpus relief under 28 USCS § 2241 to avoid constitutional issues, even when other statutes like 8 USCS § 1252 limit judicial review. See 28 USCS § 2241, 8 USCS § 1252, § 27.08 Statutory and Constitutional Interpretation.
Additionally, 8 USCS § 1226a provides that judicial review of certain detention decisions related to national security is available exclusively through habeas corpus proceedings, but only in specific courts, such as the Supreme Court or the D.C. Circuit. 8 USCS § 1226a. Furthermore, 8 USCS § 1503 allows habeas corpus review for individuals denied admission to the United States under certain circumstances. 8 USCS § 1503.
Bill of Rights and Constitutional protections:
1. Freedom of Speech, Religion, Press.
Probably extended to everyone including visitors. If an illegal alien says Joe Biden is demented, would he get to stay in the US? This seems to be ‘differentially’ prosecuted and treated by the Government.
2. Right to Bear Arms.
Limited to Citizens. How about Non-Citizens? Do non-Citizens have free and unfettered access to firearms? What about Automatic Weapons? Can non-Citizens form militia’s and go against the Government? I would say that this right is NOT granted to Illegal aliens. Doesn’t seem like this followed for illegal immigrants.
3. Quartering Soldiers. Does an illegal alien, living in the United States, have to quarter military persons in their dwelling or give up their residence? Probably, under the eminent domain and the portion of ‘illegal’ they probably could do it now. Probably not protected.
4. Searches and Seizures. Probably protected for illegal aliens.
5. Rights in Criminal cases. Probably protected for illegal aliens.
6. Right to a fair trial. Probably protected for illegals.
7. Right in Civil cases. Probably protected for illegals
8. Bails, fines, punishment. Probably protected.
I would say that some of the Amendments of the Constitution appear to be applicable, but not necessarily guaranteed to illegal aliens. The second Amendment does not appear to be guaranteed or applicable to all Citizens now, despite the language in the bill. So, some of the Constitution appears to apply to Citizens and some to illegals, but not all to individuals in either group. Especially if you were present in Washington DC on Jan 2020, where the Bill of Rights was ignored by the Democrats after.
“petition for writ of habeas corpus.”
The “corpus” is your arse being in the country ILLEGALLY.
It seems to me once the threshold of a person being here illegally is established…. Thats it. Its constitutionally legal to be detained and subsequently deported. There is no defense for it. Asylum seekers who have not went the “due process” for asylum have missed their chance, they are simply illegal.This applies to about 99% of illegals who claim “asylum”. Good bye, try again later.
“If you want to deny it to illegal aliens, then how could a valid U.S. citizen challenge their deportation.”
There is only ONE question to ask: “Are you a US Citizen?” In the vast majority of cases, the person ADMITS they are not.
Finished with habeas corpus for deportation purposes.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.