Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Global Leaders Rush to Woo Trump, Hoping to Sway Him on Tariffs
The New York Times ^ | April 7, 2025, 3:33 p.m. ET | Ana Swanson, Alexandra Stevenson, Damien Cave and Jeanna Smialek

Posted on 04/07/2025 1:55:02 PM PDT by E. Pluribus Unum

Dozens of foreign governments were trying to appeal to the president to have steep tariffs rolled back, but the president and his advisers have indicated negotiations could be difficult.

President Trump’s plan to impose sweeping tariffs on most of America’s trading partners has governments across the globe racing to schedule phone calls, send delegations to Washington and offer up proposals to lower their import taxes in order to escape the levies.

On Monday, European officials offered to drop tariffs to zero on cars and industrial goods imported from the United States, in return for the same treatment. Israel’s prime minister was expected to personally petition Mr. Trump on Monday in meetings at the White House. Vietnam’s top leader, in a phone call last week, offered to get rid of tariffs on American goods, while Indonesia prepared to send a high-level delegation to Washington, D.C., to “directly negotiate with the U.S. government.”

Even Lesotho, the tiny landlocked country in Southern Africa, was assembling a delegation to send to Washington to protest the tariffs on its exports to the United States, which includes denim for Calvin Klein and Levi’s.

Mr. Trump and his advisers have given mixed signals on whether the United States is willing to negotiate. On Sunday, Mr. Trump said that the tariffs would remain in place until U.S. trade deficits disappeared, meaning the United States is no longer buying more from these countries than it sells to them. But the administration still appeared to be welcoming offers from foreign nations, which are desperate to try to forestall more levies that go into effect on Wednesday.

On Monday, as markets recoiled for a third day and Mr. Trump threatened even more punishing tariffs on China, the president said that “negotiations with other countries, which have also requested meetings, will begin taking...”

(Excerpt) Read more at nytimes.com ...


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Foreign Affairs; Government
KEYWORDS: tariffs; woo; woohoo

1 posted on 04/07/2025 1:55:02 PM PDT by E. Pluribus Unum
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

One does not woo Trump; one negotiates with Trump.


2 posted on 04/07/2025 2:01:19 PM PDT by vaskypilot
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

The hat in hand express.


3 posted on 04/07/2025 2:01:38 PM PDT by Track9 (Make haste slowly. )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

Giving him a bouquet and saying “We meant calling you an out of control orangeman dictator before in a nice way. You know, sort of us guys kidding each other with putdowns.”


4 posted on 04/07/2025 2:01:54 PM PDT by frank ballenger (There's a battle outside and it's raging. It'll soon shake your windows and rattle your walls. )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

Wow, all the doom and gloom about how wrong Trump is on tariffs. This is just the very beginning of the golden age for America despite the Democrat’s desperate efforts to destroy America and halt the destruction of their Deep State globalist lotus of power.


5 posted on 04/07/2025 2:03:49 PM PDT by Obadiah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

What many people failed to realize when they talk about smoot Hawley is that that was an active during a time when the US was a trade surplus nation.

It’s not possible for a trade deficit nation to lose a trade war against a trade, surplus nation.


6 posted on 04/07/2025 2:17:50 PM PDT by NoLibZone (Scary that a party can "run" a candidate that doesn't feel any need to campaign.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NoLibZone

Very good point. They were punitive tariffs, not reactionary.


7 posted on 04/07/2025 2:28:31 PM PDT by HYPOCRACY (Long live The Great MAGA Kangz!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

Screw the tariffs. Let’s talk about trade barriers. Then we’ll talk tariffs.


8 posted on 04/07/2025 2:28:41 PM PDT by Wilderness Conservative (Nature is the ultimate conservative)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NoLibZone
It’s not possible for a trade deficit nation to lose a trade war against a trade, surplus nation.

I do not disbelieve you, but I am not sure how that works.

Could you expand on it a little so I can use the same argument in the future?

9 posted on 04/07/2025 2:31:49 PM PDT by E. Pluribus Unum (Democrats are the Party of anger, hate and violence.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

Dozens NYT?


10 posted on 04/07/2025 2:42:19 PM PDT by WeaslesRippedMyFlesh
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

Keep Macron on hold.


11 posted on 04/07/2025 2:42:23 PM PDT by silent majority rising (When it is dark enough, men see the stars. Ralph Waldo Emerson)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum
Hard to believe this is from NYT.
Almost sounds like Gatewaypundit.
12 posted on 04/07/2025 2:50:32 PM PDT by SmokingJoe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NoLibZone

Exactly what I keep trying to explain. It’s a near mathematical certainty that the US wins the tariff war.


13 posted on 04/07/2025 3:03:03 PM PDT by Obadiah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

It must’ve pained the NYT to write this.


14 posted on 04/07/2025 3:21:05 PM PDT by libertylover (Our biggest problem, by far, is that almost all of big media is AGENDA-DRIVEN, not-truth driven.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: libertylover

Indeed. ‘’The Devil holds the prayer book.’’.


15 posted on 04/07/2025 3:36:34 PM PDT by jmacusa (Liberals. Too stupid to be idiots.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Track9

Bend the knee.


16 posted on 04/07/2025 3:53:55 PM PDT by Salamander (Please visit my profile page to help me go home again. https://www.givesendgo.com/GCRRD)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

You have 10 grapes

I have no grapes.

We negotiate for grapes.

I falil.

Did I lose any grapes?


17 posted on 04/07/2025 7:34:43 PM PDT by NoLibZone (Scary that a party can "run" a candidate that doesn't feel any need to campaign.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: NoLibZone

In 1930 trade was .7% of GDP. That is tiny. POINT 7 PERCENT. Smoot Hawley had little to no effect on the US GD.


18 posted on 04/07/2025 7:39:37 PM PDT by central_va (I won't be reconstructed and I do not give a damn...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: central_va

Hi.

Was it just .7 % of GDP in 1930?

Every thing i find says 7%.

I like your number better.


19 posted on 04/07/2025 9:07:39 PM PDT by NoLibZone (Scary that a party can "run" a candidate that doesn't feel any need to campaign.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson