Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Lujan Grisham rescinds radical anti-gun order as November election nears
Pinon Post ^ | October 17, 2024 | Pinon Post

Posted on 10/19/2024 7:32:46 AM PDT by Towed_Jumper

Far-left, anti-gun Gov. Michelle Lujan Grisham announced on Wednesday that she is allowing the expiration of her emergency public health order, which temporarily suspended the right to carry guns in public parks and playgrounds within the Albuquerque metro area, an attack on Second Amendment rights.

The initial order, issued in September 2023, created a firestorm across the state, leading to public protests, legal challenges, and impeachment articles introduced. Lujan Grisham’s action, which aimed to curb gun violence following several tragic shootings that claimed the lives of children, ignited a broader debate over the limits of executive power and gun rights.

“I have decided to allow the public health order to expire, but our fight to protect New Mexico communities from the dangers posed by guns and illegal drugs will continue,” the governor stated.

(Excerpt) Read more at pinonpost.com ...


TOPICS: News/Current Events; US: New Mexico
KEYWORDS: banglist; gunban; lujangrisham; newmexico
I can see Grisham reinstating this anti-gun order sometime after November 5th. She'll do it in the name of "public order and safety" especially if political chaos breaks out in the country following the election.
1 posted on 10/19/2024 7:32:46 AM PDT by Towed_Jumper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Towed_Jumper

Not to worry. It’ll be back after the election. Like Frosty the Snowman.


2 posted on 10/19/2024 7:37:38 AM PDT by BenLurkin (The above is not a statement of fact. It is either opinion, or satire, or both.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Towed_Jumper

Well, don’t re-elect her.


3 posted on 10/19/2024 7:38:05 AM PDT by Larry Lucido (Donate! Don't just post clickbait!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BenLurkin
"Not to worry. It’ll be back after the election."

This is an indictment of the voters themselves. The voters are going to go back to sleep. These rotten people know they have time on their side and can do what they want in a very short time.

4 posted on 10/19/2024 7:45:01 AM PDT by ProgressingAmerica (We cannot vote our way out of these problems. The only way out is to activist our way out.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Towed_Jumper

And that’s when you really need to be armed or die.


5 posted on 10/19/2024 7:50:58 AM PDT by Ronald77
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Towed_Jumper

Knew it was facing defeat in the courts.


6 posted on 10/19/2024 7:54:00 AM PDT by DesertRhino (2016 Star Wars, 2020 The Empire Strikes Back, 2024... RETURN OF THE JEDI. )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Towed_Jumper

Gun laws have nothing to do with public safety. They are attacks on freedom that are intended to punish law abiding citizens with nonconforming ideas. Every gun law should have a sunset provision and require proof of effectiveness to be renewed. Making life miserable for lawful gun owners does not make the restrictions effective.


7 posted on 10/19/2024 8:05:52 AM PDT by Spok (Listen to seekers of truth; avoid those who have found it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Towed_Jumper

“Lujan Grisham’s action, which aimed to curb gun violence following several tragic shootings that claimed the lives of children, ignited a broader debate over the limits of executive power and gun rights....”

Yeah, like the bad guys are gonna follow this “action”. She knows better. Democrats are always after our means of defense against them.


8 posted on 10/19/2024 8:26:43 AM PDT by bk1000 (Banned from Breitbart)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Comment #9 Removed by Moderator

To: Towed_Jumper

Carry anyway.

Your constitutional rights are not up to the whim of some public servant

Emphasis on “servant”


10 posted on 10/19/2024 8:56:21 AM PDT by NFHale (The Second Amendment - By Any Means)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Towed_Jumper

Look deeper. Is it possible her actions on this are negatively affecting the 2024 election for her party? These little ripples in the water can start telling us a lot about where this election is heading.


11 posted on 10/19/2024 8:58:34 AM PDT by Frank Drebin (And don't ever let me catch you guys in America!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NFHale
Your constitutional rights are not up to the whim of some public servant.

To the contrary, they most certainly are. In this instance they were effectively revoked for over a year at the whim of a public servant.

For that entire year a citizen exercising the right to carry could be crushed and bankrupted by the strong arm of the government. This is a vivid example of what we face nation-wide.

Now your premise is also certainly correct. With a little thought it is apparent there are a number of ways to better protect those rights and avoid lapses in our enjoyment of those rights.

An unrelated example, the DOD recently published rules that described abortion protesters as "terrorists". That sounds like a camel's nose under the tent, no telling what sort of trouble could result when using the military as crowd control. The DOD civilians and officers involved should face conclusive repercussions for that action.

12 posted on 10/19/2024 10:50:05 AM PDT by frog in a pot (Men can have babies and play in female sports and claims of 2020 election fraud are false.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Frank Drebin
Look deeper. Is it possible her actions on this are negatively affecting the 2024 election for her party? These little ripples in the water can start telling us a lot about where this election is heading.

Great observation...I hadn't thought about that angle.

13 posted on 10/19/2024 11:07:13 AM PDT by Towed_Jumper (Please remain seated until your civilization comes to a complete stop.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: frog in a pot

Whether you to obey and comply or not is entirely up to you.

There are consequences to either choice.

But it is STILL a choice.

For myself, I WILL and ALWAYS do carry, anywhere and everywhere I choose.

My life is more valuable to me than stupid democrat apparatchik law.

Everyone must choose for themselves.

My rights are non- negotiable; the moment you let “them” dictate what you can and can’t do, you’ve surrendered to them.

For me. That’s not an option.


14 posted on 10/19/2024 9:51:06 PM PDT by NFHale (The Second Amendment - By Any Means)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Levy78

Oh sure we’re all drunk Indians only until you need help fighting the enemies of the USA.

Navajo Code Talker John Kinsel Sr. passes away at 107

https://freerepublic.com/focus/f-chat/4272161/posts


15 posted on 10/20/2024 8:40:34 AM PDT by Redcitizen
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

Comment #16 Removed by Moderator

To: Levy78

I’m a Navajo myself living on the Reservation. So I have knowledge of how we live. Only thing that helps alcoholism in any race is being saved by the Blood of Jesus Christ.


17 posted on 10/20/2024 9:10:48 AM PDT by Redcitizen
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson