If you are pro-life or pro-constitution, you must vote for Trump

American Thinker ^ | 09/03/2024 | Wolf Howling

[SeekAndFind]

All pro-life people need to support and vote for Trump in the 2024 election. They need to take the huge, giant “W” (aka the win) on abortion that the Supreme Court gave America with the Dobbs decision and carry their fight against abortion to the state level. They also must understand that the moral fight over abortion is inextricably intertwined with the greatest cancer of 20th-century American government, namely, judicial activism. If we lose this one, we’ve lost the nation.

This is how close we are:

They want to overthrow The Constitution

pic.twitter.com/d1g35Vavwy

— Elon Musk (@elonmusk) September 1, 2024

A vocal minority of pro-life supporters are claiming that Trump has turned his back on the pro-life cause. A number are threatening to withhold their vote for Trump because of it, while in the most extreme cases, some claim they will vote for Harris. Many of these people are well-meaning, but they don’t understand the law nor why Trump’s position is as pro-life as possible. And they do not appreciate the existential stakes at issue.

Our Constitution, at Article I Section 8, enumerates the limited areas in which the federal legislature may create laws. Abortion is not mentioned there, nor is it mentioned in the Bill of Rights. Thus, for 186 years after Americans ratified the Constitution in 1787, abortion was wholly an issue of state law. During this time, abortion was never mentioned in a Republican Party platform.

That changed in 1973 when seven activist judges used Roe v Wade to usurp the power of the people to amend the Constitution by penning a right to abortion on the margins. But in truth, this was just one of a series of radical and unconstitutional Supreme Court decisions...

[Dick Bachert]

BEWARE THE LIES RE. THE MISNAMED “SAVE” ACT!
Patriots! Beware of Talking Points and Bill Summaries - they lie. The so-called “SAVE” Act does the opposite of what you’ve been told. Under the “SAVE” Act, the children born here of the 10 to 40 Million invaders (CCP, Islamists, etc.) will be US Citizens entitled to vote in OUR federal elections. The “SAVE” Act provides that the requirements for voting in our federal elections are that one have a government issued ID Card (this is to ultimately force us into the egregious “REAL ID” card) and a birth certificate showing that one was born in the United States. Read Kelleigh Nelson’s article: https://newswithviews.com/the-diabolical-save-act-puts-americans-in-chains/
So! the Children of the invaders born here are to be US citizens - and YOU will have to get a government issued ID Card to be permitted to vote. Tell your (dumb) Republican US Senators to oppose the “SAVE” Act.

[Dick Bachert]

BEWARE THE LIES RE. THE MISNAMED “SAVE” ACT!
Patriots! Beware of Talking Points and Bill Summaries - they lie. The so-called “SAVE” Act does the opposite of what you’ve been told. Under the “SAVE” Act, the children born here of the 10 to 40 Million invaders (CCP, Islamists, etc.) will be US Citizens entitled to vote in OUR federal elections. The “SAVE” Act provides that the requirements for voting in our federal elections are that one have a government issued ID Card (this is to ultimately force us into the egregious “REAL ID” card) and a birth certificate showing that one was born in the United States. Read Kelleigh Nelson’s article: https://newswithviews.com/the-diabolical-save-act-puts-americans-in-chains/
So! the Children of the invaders born here are to be US citizens - and YOU will have to get a government issued ID Card to be permitted to vote. Tell your (dumb) Republican US Senators to oppose the “SAVE” Act.

[SeekAndFind]

RE: I might write-in American Solidarity candidate Peter Sonski, a solid Pro-Life candidate

1. Does he favor the DOBBS decision? Or is it not enough in his view?

2. Does he support a federal ban on all abortions from the moment of conception?

3. What is his stance on abortion for rape and incest?

[Gene Eric]

Kansas 2022

[NorthMountain]

And that is why we must hold “our guys” accountable. NO politician is entirely to be trusted. To his credit, Mr. Trump listened to the criticism, and did the right thing.

[Recovering_Democrat]

Agreed. DJT delivered as he said he would on Constitutionalists on SCOTUS.

Some of us in the pro-life movement seem put-out that we have to work on the personal and state level to make abortion repulsive to a public that had 50 years of pro-infanticide propaganda fed to them.

We worked to elect DJT, and he made good—better than Reagan or the Bush family. Now we need to buckle down and do our part on the local level.

Quit depending on Big Daddy Fed to do the work again. Once we have done the job (with God’s grace of course) of getting abortion to be as sickening to our neighbors as it is to us, the table will be set to maybe federalize the issue.

Right now, we are not at the “federalize” the issue...doing so would be to do the right thing in the wrong way. We would be doing what the Roe decision did for the Molech worshipers.

Let’s work and pray to bring people to our side on this important issue. This is the way.

[enumerated]

If you are even partially sane, you must vote for Trump.

[Responsibility2nd]

If you are pro-life or pro-constitution, you must vote for Trump

________________________________________________

Oh we will vote for him all right. Despite his pro-choice anti constitutional positions.

[Responsibility2nd]

Since it’s a state issue I only care about the position of candidate’s abortion stance when they are running for state office.

You think it doesn't matter that Trump is pro-choice in his own home state? That his pro-choice positions won't carry over on a national level?

Guess what? It alreaady has.

Trump cannot claim the federal government has no input on abortion, yet allow the government to aid in mailing abortion pills.

[Responsibility2nd]

1. Does he favor the DOBBS decision? Or is it not enough in his view?

The Dobbs decision is too much. It's unconstitutional and one of the worst SC decisions ever.

[tsowellfan]

If you are pro-abortion and for or against the Constitution you must vote for Trump.

At the rates for motels these days under Biden/Harris, who can afford to accidentally make babies?

[Sam Gamgee]

Yes but the Christian left will go bananas with this idea. Trump represents “meanness” and “arrogance”. Blah blah blah. Trump could be a legless monkey and you still would be an idiot for not voting that ticket if you are pro-life.

[SeekAndFind]

RE: The Dobbs decision is too much. It’s unconstitutional and one of the worst SC decisions ever.

The Dobbs decision left the decision on abortion to each individual states to decides, instead of the all-encompassing Roe v. Wade.

Since you said the Dobbs decision is in fact too much, what kind of SC decision would satisfy Peter Sonski?

[Responsibility2nd]

The Dobbs decision left the decision on abortion to each individual states to decides....

______________________________________________

And the Dred Scott decision left the decision on slavery up to each individual states to decide.

Both decisions were evil and unconstitutional.

[SeekAndFind]

OK, what should have been the right SCOTUS decision by your lights?

[Responsibility2nd]

Enforce the 14th

No State shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the United States; nor shall any State deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws.