Posted on 09/03/2024 11:03:39 AM PDT by SeekAndFind
All pro-life people need to support and vote for Trump in the 2024 election. They need to take the huge, giant “W” (aka the win) on abortion that the Supreme Court gave America with the Dobbs decision and carry their fight against abortion to the state level. They also must understand that the moral fight over abortion is inextricably intertwined with the greatest cancer of 20th-century American government, namely, judicial activism. If we lose this one, we’ve lost the nation.
This is how close we are:
They want to overthrow The Constitution
— Elon Musk (@elonmusk) September 1, 2024
A vocal minority of pro-life supporters are claiming that Trump has turned his back on the pro-life cause. A number are threatening to withhold their vote for Trump because of it, while in the most extreme cases, some claim they will vote for Harris. Many of these people are well-meaning, but they don’t understand the law nor why Trump’s position is as pro-life as possible. And they do not appreciate the existential stakes at issue.
Our Constitution, at Article I Section 8, enumerates the limited areas in which the federal legislature may create laws. Abortion is not mentioned there, nor is it mentioned in the Bill of Rights. Thus, for 186 years after Americans ratified the Constitution in 1787, abortion was wholly an issue of state law. During this time, abortion was never mentioned in a Republican Party platform.
That changed in 1973 when seven activist judges used Roe v Wade to usurp the power of the people to amend the Constitution by penning a right to abortion on the margins. But in truth, this was just one of a series of radical and unconstitutional Supreme Court decisions...
(Excerpt) Read more at americanthinker.com ...
He DID turn his back on the pro-life cause, until he was badgered into saying he’d vote against Am. 4 in FL.
It would break my heart if a 747 were to crash right on the NY Times building.
And our fates are in the hands of the undecideds. People too stupid to see a clear choice.
It might not be a good idea at all to listen to good sense.
RE: He DID turn his back on the pro-life cause, until he was badgered into saying he’d vote against Am. 4 in FL.
1) Think about the alternative... would Kamala allow herself to be badgered/convince to vote against Amendment 4?
2) We don’t have other choices unfortunately. Kamala, RFK Jr., Cornel West, Jill Stein... are ALL pro-choice. The only alternative if you won’t vote for Trump is to stay home.
And if you do, Think about what would happen if ENOUGH pro-lifers stay home.
I’m pro - “taking the Neo-marxist boot off America’s neck.”
My vote won’t matter in Kentucky but I might write-in American Solidarity candidate Peter Sonski, a solid Pro-Life candidate. He got 408 votes in Kentucky in 20. The last straw for me was Trump’s Truth Social post the day after Harris’ speech: “My Administration will be great for women and their reproductive rights.” How much more plain could he be? What kind of judges will we get from him in a second term? Squish Roberts types who will let you start doing something about abortion at 15 weeks when 93% of the abortions have taken place? He and Vance keep saying they won’t do anything about the abortion pill. That 60% of abortions. He’s Pro-Abortion now. Let’s come out of our denial. I have no interest being in a cult. If he’s not going to defend the principle of Life, next up. Republicans should fight against having their Party turned into a Rockefeller Pro-Abortion Party. At least when the Bushes betrayed us they were done running for office. He initially was going to vote Pro-Abortion on the Florida ballot initiative. God bless the Pro-Lifer/Lifers who must given him the last straw speech behind the scenes on the Florida initiative.
Also if you’re a gun owner. Harris wants to ban ALL firearms.
According to this source, female homemakers are the MOST reliable donors to Trump.
No wonder the marxists want women to kill their children.
Point 1 is the interesting thing about the Donald.
As for the current landscape, what you say is plainly seen. My point is to point out what is.
he’s got ‘em by the you-know-what’s!
While the “choice” argument is important, we have more pressing issues than that, since the outcome of the others will directly influence the outcome of that one.
Corrupt voting process.
Close the border.
2nd amendment issues (if the 2nd gets weaker and/or fails all the rest are toilet paper).
Out of control spending.
Endless wars and police actions.
Dredge the deep state.
Shrink government.
Repeal the 17th and give states back their voice.
Fix the tax coded and stimulate the economy. (repeal the 16th)
Drill, drill, drill.
Handle these issues and the abortion issue will be easier to address once we have teeth as a people again.
“we have more pressing issues than” 3000 infants being murdered every day in the country? No way! Disagree! This is end of the Roman Empire stuff. This is about the survival of our nation.
I think you’re exactly right. But I think the most important is not in your list.
#1: The First Amendment MUST be protected and strictly enforced before the abortion will be solved. Once freedom of religion is gone, all morality will be illegal and/or swept under the rug. (It already has started.)
If people hear the Gospel and change their ways, only then will they seriously not consider aborting a child.
I agree on that point, but without the 2nd staying strong we will lose the 1st at the front of the battle.
The journalist is both overreaching and whitewashing history. That said, there are thousands of reasons to vote for Trump over Harris.
I agree, one death sickens me, but I also know you cannot fight if you don’t have anything to fight with... If we as a people are not financially sound, armed, remove most corruption, and have fair elections for the real people’s voice to be heard, then nothing will ever change.
You cannot fight if you are not armed and supplied. Roamn’s downfall was completed by unfettered immigration and the population becoming so hedonist and self-absorbed that the military was manned by mercenaries and foreigners with no allegiance to Rome (what they are trying with our military now).
To me with the reversal of R v W, what any one seeking a federal office’s position on abortion is no longer really a relevant question. Since it’s a state issue I only care about the position of candidate’s abortion stance when they are running for state office.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.