Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Russia’s MiG-35 Fighter: Really Just a MiG-29 on Steroids?
National Security Journal ^ | 8/2/2024 | Christian D. Orr

Posted on 08/04/2024 5:11:22 AM PDT by whyilovetexas111

The MiG-35, also known as the “Fulcrum-F,” is a modernized version of the MiG-29 designed as a “4++ generation” fighter.

First flown in 2016 and entering service in 2019, it features upgrades like an AESA radar, reduced radar signature, improved engines, and the ability to serve as a refueling tanker.

Despite these enhancements, the MiG-35 has struggled to find success, both domestically and internationally.

(Excerpt) Read more at nationalsecurityjournal.org ...


TOPICS: Foreign Affairs; Government; Russia
KEYWORDS: aviation; defense; military; russia
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021 next last
I had never heard of the MiG-35 until now. While many seem to not like this fighter, I have a lot more respect for Russian Aviation since the Ukraine war. They seem like their forces can take a pounding and keep on fighting.
1 posted on 08/04/2024 5:11:22 AM PDT by whyilovetexas111
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: whyilovetexas111

America’s F-35, the 71% sitting on the ground unable to fly just Sopwith Camels on steroids sitting there?


2 posted on 08/04/2024 5:16:35 AM PDT by hardspunned (Former DC GOP globalist stoogeas)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: whyilovetexas111



3 posted on 08/04/2024 6:08:16 AM PDT by null and void (I identify as a conspiracy theorist. My personal pronouns are told/you/so.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: whyilovetexas111

The dirty little MIC secret is that stealth isn’t. Every “stealth” aircraft can be seen, just at reduced distances, but still seen far enough away to be shot down.


4 posted on 08/04/2024 6:10:02 AM PDT by CodeToad (Rule #1: The elites want you dead.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: whyilovetexas111

That is a nice looking jet as it looks a lot like an F-15.


5 posted on 08/04/2024 6:14:21 AM PDT by bosco24
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: CodeToad

First, it’s no secret that ‘stealth’ just reduces return signature to something below threshold detection for the system it is s designed to defeat. Thats just physics and nothing to do with MIC insinuations.

Secondly, like many weapon systems, their useful life is limited to the time it takes to developed defense against it. Thus always the pursuit of the next new thing or upgrade, and the desire to keep the new thing under wraps until it’s needed. The F117 for example was highly successful in Desert Storm, but retired afterwards as its capabilities became known and could be countered.


6 posted on 08/04/2024 6:27:32 AM PDT by Magnum44 (...against all enemies, foreign and domestic... )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: whyilovetexas111

Russian military aircraft are few in number and would not last long against the US in combat. Even now, Ukraine’s air defenses suffice to keep Russian aircraft out of Ukrainian airspace.


7 posted on 08/04/2024 6:29:44 AM PDT by Rockingham
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: whyilovetexas111

My rule of thumb is if it looks good, it probably is.


8 posted on 08/04/2024 7:13:14 AM PDT by fso301
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Rockingham

The new weapons should be unmanned strike weapons. Cheaper to build and could be of much higher performance capability due to the fact that no onboard human pilot is required.


9 posted on 08/04/2024 7:32:41 AM PDT by 9422WMR
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: null and void

Close copy of the F-15.


10 posted on 08/04/2024 7:33:34 AM PDT by DownInFlames (P)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: fso301
My rule of thumb is if it looks good, it probably is.

Depends on the definition of 'looks good'. The A-10 isn't pretty, Same for the C-130. The B-58 looked better than the B-52, but compare utility in 2024.

11 posted on 08/04/2024 7:34:36 AM PDT by PAR35
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: bosco24

Looks more like an F-14 Tomcat


12 posted on 08/04/2024 7:37:26 AM PDT by beethovenfan (The REAL Great Reset will be when Jesus returns. )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: PAR35
Beauty is in the eye of the beholder

Gets my vote.

13 posted on 08/04/2024 7:51:06 AM PDT by McGruff (Deep State is running the country.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: McGruff

Nice Grouping !!!


14 posted on 08/04/2024 9:48:17 AM PDT by mabarker1 ( (Congress- the opposite of PROGRESS!!! A fraud, a hypocrite, a liar. I'm a member of Congress!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: whyilovetexas111

They only work as long as Russia can get Western parts. Which are few and far between - they have to rely on Chinese to supply them with parts which may or may not work.


15 posted on 08/04/2024 9:57:56 AM PDT by PIF (They came for me and mine ... now its your turn)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: beethovenfan

No Variable Swing Wings.

More here: https://www.flightglobal.com/kings-of-the-swingers-top-13-swing-wing-aircraft-/114607.article


16 posted on 08/04/2024 10:00:15 AM PDT by mabarker1 ( (Congress- the opposite of PROGRESS!!! A fraud, a hypocrite, a liar. I'm a member of Congress!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: 9422WMR
That is how things are headed it seems. There are plans to have drones that operate as "loyal wingmen" to manned aircraft, or as that element of a strike package most suited to high risks where enemy airspace is heavily defended. Some versions of the next generation of a US fighter or strike aircraft also make it optionally manned.

My guess is that due to sanctions and Russia's heavy cost for their Ukraine war, they will be far behind in these developments.

17 posted on 08/04/2024 10:10:25 AM PDT by Rockingham
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]


18 posted on 08/04/2024 10:35:34 AM PDT by JonPreston ( ✌ ☮️ )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: whyilovetexas111

The fighter is just a platform, the AA missiles it carries has our Pentagon scared. A recent Ukie jet was downed by a Russian AA at least 200 miles, the Ukie pilot stated he never saw it coming.

The Pentagon is aware, but thus far has been unable to confirm Vlads new missile’s capabilities.


19 posted on 08/04/2024 1:33:32 PM PDT by delta7
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JonPreston

Jon, you silly savage

You look fabulous in that vid!


20 posted on 08/04/2024 3:18:44 PM PDT by canuck_conservative (NATO - now celebrating 75 successful years of keeping the Russian monsters out!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson