Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Justice Elena Kagan says Supreme Court’s code of conduct needs an enforcement plan. Takeaways from her wide-ranging comments.
CNN ^ | July 25, 2024 | Devan Cole

Posted on 07/25/2024 7:27:52 PM PDT by Reno89519

Justice Elena Kagan on Thursday defended the code of conduct the Supreme Court created last year, but conceded there needs to be a way to enforce the rules for it to be more effective.

“I think that the rules that we put out are good ones,” Kagan said at a judicial conference in Sacramento. “I think that the thing that can be criticized is, you know, rules usually have enforcement mechanisms attached to them. And this one, this set of rules does not.”

...

Kagan’s criticism of the court on Thursday was not limited to its new code of conduct. She also expressed frustration with the large number of concurrences her colleagues have been issuing in cases, which she described as “not a good thing for the court.”

...

Kagan also made clear that she was growing impatient with the increased use of the court’s emergency docket, in which the court can issue unsigned and unexplained orders that allow the justices to act on a case while also shielding the legal analysis behind the decision and the vote count.

...

(Excerpt) Read more at cnn.com ...


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Culture/Society; Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: elenakagan; nevertrumpingtroll; rino89519; scotus; supremecourt; zotthistroll
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-36 next last
This is actually a quick read and interesting discussion covering a range of topics involving the Supreme Court. It's worth a read.
1 posted on 07/25/2024 7:27:52 PM PDT by Reno89519
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Reno89519

How about you start interpreting the law instead of taking orders on how you’re going to rule.


2 posted on 07/25/2024 7:30:02 PM PDT by WeaslesRippedMyFlesh (there will come a day when FR rejects articles from the NYT, et. al. as "Commie trash, no thank you")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Reno89519

Careful what you wish for, Alana, for you shall surely get it.


3 posted on 07/25/2024 7:30:43 PM PDT by E. Pluribus Unum (The worst thing about censorship is █████ ██ ████ ████ ████ █ ███████ ████. FJB.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Reno89519

Why are concurrences bad?


4 posted on 07/25/2024 7:37:39 PM PDT by nickcarraway
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

If she doesn’t like it, she can quit.


5 posted on 07/25/2024 7:37:39 PM PDT by Indy Pendance (Jesus can't get here soon enough!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Reno89519

Uh, we’re not exactly talkin’ the bright star of the S Court.
More like a burnt out asteroid.

Sorta like CNN’s status in the media world.


6 posted on 07/25/2024 7:38:57 PM PDT by Da Coyote
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: nickcarraway

Read what she says. Her concern is that there are recently too many and they muddy up decisions, which will have negative consequences in the future. Makes sense.


7 posted on 07/25/2024 7:42:37 PM PDT by Reno89519 (Biden's Given His Farewell Address, So When Is He Leaving?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Reno89519

““not a good thing for the court.””

Whatta bout rulings being good for the Country?


8 posted on 07/25/2024 7:45:29 PM PDT by Paladin2 (YMMV)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Paladin2

Yes, she’s unhappy with rulings. Sounds like she’s not totally rejecting Chevron, just concern with abrupt impact. Now sure how they’d do anything less.


9 posted on 07/25/2024 7:47:59 PM PDT by Reno89519 (Biden's Given His Farewell Address, So When Is He Leaving?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Reno89519
Read what she says. Her concern is that there are recently too many and they muddy up decisions, which will have negative consequences in the future. Makes sense.

The problem with SCOTUS is they LOVE to hear cases to "set policy", and then they usually do nothing when the lower courts violate that policy. It's a much more boring job to rein in renegade decisions, but very necessary. If the constitution functioned as intended, Congress would be setting the policies, addressing the lacuna in the law, etc., and not SCOTUS.
10 posted on 07/25/2024 7:48:27 PM PDT by Dr. Franklin ("A republic, if you can keep it." )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Reno89519

they didn’t care one whit about this with RBG was smoozing with liberals all the time


11 posted on 07/25/2024 7:52:51 PM PDT by TexasFreeper2009
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Reno89519

Honestly, I didn’t know she could think on her own.

Sure she wrote this?


12 posted on 07/25/2024 7:56:19 PM PDT by WeaslesRippedMyFlesh (there will come a day when FR rejects articles from the NYT, et. al. as "Commie trash, no thank you")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Reno89519

All government elected and hired or appointed should meet the same standards. From the executive, the two houses, judixary, and all departments and agencies.


13 posted on 07/25/2024 7:56:43 PM PDT by Jumper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TexasFreeper2009

Yeah, they are a bit selective about what concerns them. I cannot see how they establish oversight since they are top of the food chain. It seems like anything would require a constitutional amendment.


14 posted on 07/25/2024 7:57:36 PM PDT by Reno89519 (Biden's Given His Farewell Address, So When Is He Leaving?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Reno89519

yep, all this talk is just bs, since they themselves will get to decide if any limits are constitutional, which they wont.

They will continue to police themselves. Liberal is just mad that she doesn’t get to decide to exclude conservatives from any case she wants.


15 posted on 07/25/2024 7:59:47 PM PDT by TexasFreeper2009
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: All

.
Kagan knows there’s no enforcement for Dems in the DC Swamp.

Write all the rules you want, they won’t apply to her. Simple

Look at Classified Docs and Joe Biden, Comey, and Pence.


16 posted on 07/25/2024 7:59:53 PM PDT by AnthonySoprano (Impeachment Inquiry is necessary since Deep State is blocking )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Indy Pendance

she can quit after Trump is elected ;)


17 posted on 07/25/2024 8:00:36 PM PDT by TexasFreeper2009
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum
I too believe Elana should be careful about wishful desires.

Who knows? Next we may even put in place a test on her ability to read. . . . And heaven above, we may even require Justices to demonstrate their ability to LOGICALLY express what she actually read.

Someone who can't express what the WORDS say over 90% needs to resign. Reminds me of bad cops.

18 posted on 07/25/2024 8:18:39 PM PDT by Freeper (My authority? I can read, do logic and math plus words have meanings!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: WeaslesRippedMyFlesh

I do think they should be under the rule no more than a ten dollar gift can be accepted. If they get a physical gift that is more than ten dollars, they have to donate it to the US government. It’s ridiculous for them to accept trips, prizes and other Bennie’s. They make more than enough money for the work they do.


19 posted on 07/25/2024 8:34:54 PM PDT by napscoordinator (DeSantis is a beast! Florida is the freest state in the country! )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: TexasFreeper2009

From your keyboard to God’s ears...


20 posted on 07/25/2024 8:43:12 PM PDT by Texan5 ("You've got to saddle up your boys, you've got to draw a hard line"...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-36 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson