Posted on 07/24/2024 6:32:07 AM PDT by SeekAndFind
Everybody knows that the “lone gunman” is dead, but the controversy surrounding the theory that Thomas Matthew Crooks was a “lone gunman” is not.
Many feel entirely justified to continue exploring whether others had to be involved in this operation for it to unfold in the way it did.
Monday morning, Secret Service Director Cheatle studiously avoided answering any questions members of Congress were asking to help bring forth truth and transparency to the public. In response to Cheatle’s non-responses, Rep. Anna Paulina Luna tweeted out the following: “After leaving the oversight briefing this morning, I’m more convinced than ever that Crooks wasn’t working alone.”
At this point, the American public should not naively accept that a 20-year-old was acting alone any more than we should hold to any belief in the veracity of the Warren Report, which has been questioned since its issuance sixty years ago.
AI image of the real investigators.
Today, the question is the same that haunts the Kennedy assassination: Was Crooks, like Oswald, a disposable patsy set up by others to take the fall and thereby cloak the evil conspiracy and identity of the real conspirators?
In considering that question, the public should be slow to form conclusions and remain relentless in their pursuit of the real truth. We need to question the tidbits being released—i.e. leaked—by a bureaucracy that, for the time being, seems to be supporting the notion that Crooks was a single shooter operating on his own.
But there is good news.
Things have changed since 1963. Today, forensic evidence abounds. Videos and audio recordings from every conceivable perspective are almost certain to have been recorded on a host of cell phones in the hands of a multitude of ordinary private citizens.
(Excerpt) Read more at americanthinker.com ...
You might be surprised to know many people were quite vocal about how fixed they thought the Warren Commission report was. I was a young teenager at the time. I imagine most people did believe it, but there were many that never did. As I remember it at any rate.
Earl Warren was not a popular man in this country before that. I remember going down US 1 and seeing impeach Earl Warren billboards
LOL. The Warren Report flew?!? The criticisms of it have been continuous for 60 years. Geraldo, David Crosby, various other leftists.
Pelosi and Merrick’s “courts” couldn’t get rid of Trump so they tried assassination. Assassination has failed and now they’re going to pimp an Indo/Jamaican descendent of slave owners. The retarded half of people living in this country have to buy something. Something has got to stick or the far-left communist “democrazy” is toast.
Spoiling the crime scene, would probably indicate a culpability far beyond anything previously observed.
If the FBI was in fact covering up the presence of “assets”, after determining through their intelligence gathering there was another independent scheme for an assault on the President, then the reliability of their investigation is completely tarnished and probably not worth the value of the paper used in issuing the report. The “plausible denial” aspect is badly disrupted.
Are there FBI agents or “assets” willing to do this kind of “wet work”? If so, how did they get into positions of authority within the FBI, and who is protecting them?
FBI, now Famous But Incompetent.
Bongino has reported Martenson’s second shooter existed, but was actually a non—SS sniper shooting at the perp and missing. If so that should not be difficult to confirm and will resolve some of remaining mysteries. NOT including why we weren’t told about this promptly.
FYI: The demented dickhead shooter had more than head wounds....
But you can be sure they will try.
Trump Assassination Attempt: Nothing to see here, move along.
Thanks for the post; ping; posts. BUMP!
“Are there FBI agents or “assets” willing to do this kind of “wet work”?”
The short answer is “yes”.
We have the history as the template:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/COINTELPRO
Then the FBI just changed the name of the operation and buried it deep in secrecy and compartmentalization.
Today they probably have infiltrated groups like BLM and Antifa, got them training and assassination supplies and prepared them for potential missions.
If you dig deep into the MLK assassination you will see how they did the dirty.
The MLK family figured it out after they did their own investigation:
https://www.history.com/news/who-killed-martin-luther-king-james-earl-ray-mlk-assassination
Meanwhile the mass media coverup continues to this day.
#16. Bkmrk for later
Many problems with an “ official “, honest investigation conducted by our government. Who to trust? Congress? Justice depart? Fact is no one trusts our government anymore.
The only answer is a non- governmental organization. But who? Everyday more records will be “ lost”, leads buried, evidence destroyed and investigation stone walled as we saw with the SS director’s interview by Congress.
Lets hope for a SS whistleblower to come forward.
IIRC, TRUMP SAID HE WOULD RELEASE ALL THE JFK REPORTS.
“AI image of the real investigators.”
:)
I’ll call it...deliberate ‘lax security’ AND a patsy that knew it could be exploited during a one-off event, when he was seen and not stopped. Too big of a coincidence.
When President Trump was asked by one interviewers why he refused to release all of the JFK files he said something to the effect that “if you knew what I knew about these files you wouldn’t release them either”.
There is some really nasty stuff in there.
Imho even most Freepers are not ready to deal with it.
The phony baloney reports are for the academic historians so they have nice footnotes for their fake history books.
Oliver Stone’s movie made up characters, and made up facts. Not a credible movie.
You really think the FBI and the CIA would let President Trump - or any President - do that? Really?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.