A ‘Warren Report’ isn’t going to fly in 2024: It’s 2024, not 1963, and this time around, America has a mountain of evidence and an army of investigators

American Thinker ^ | 07/24/2024 | Cliff Nichols

[SeekAndFind]

Everybody knows that the “lone gunman” is dead, but the controversy surrounding the theory that Thomas Matthew Crooks was a “lone gunman” is not.

Many feel entirely justified to continue exploring whether others had to be involved in this operation for it to unfold in the way it did.

Monday morning, Secret Service Director Cheatle studiously avoided answering any questions members of Congress were asking to help bring forth truth and transparency to the public. In response to Cheatle’s non-responses, Rep. Anna Paulina Luna tweeted out the following: “After leaving the oversight briefing this morning, I’m more convinced than ever that Crooks wasn’t working alone.”

At this point, the American public should not naively accept that a 20-year-old was acting alone any more than we should hold to any belief in the veracity of the Warren Report, which has been questioned since its issuance sixty years ago.

AI image of the real investigators.

Today, the question is the same that haunts the Kennedy assassination: Was Crooks, like Oswald, a disposable patsy set up by others to take the fall and thereby cloak the evil conspiracy and identity of the real conspirators?

In considering that question, the public should be slow to form conclusions and remain relentless in their pursuit of the real truth. We need to question the tidbits being released—i.e. leaked—by a bureaucracy that, for the time being, seems to be supporting the notion that Crooks was a single shooter operating on his own.

But there is good news.

Things have changed since 1963. Today, forensic evidence abounds. Videos and audio recordings from every conceivable perspective are almost certain to have been recorded on a host of cell phones in the hands of a multitude of ordinary private citizens.

[SeekAndFind]

For instance, consider just one of these independent analysts—Chris Martenson, Ph.D.—who examined audio recordings of the shots fired that day. If you are interested, listen here to the evidence he offers to support his finding that not one, but a least two shooters, and perhaps three, were involved that day in the attempted assassination of President Trump.

Whether you agree with Dr. Martenson’s conclusions or not, is not the point.

The important point is that, at minimum, independent analysis like his adds to the mix of information now available to all of us from independent sources for our further evaluation in real-time. We are no longer solely dependent on our government to arrive at the conclusion it wants the Americans to have.

We can now explore issues on our own. We can ask whether the F.B.I. has made the same type of audio analysis as Dr. Martenson. If it has, what are its conclusions (along with proof)? And if it hasn’t, why not? Indeed, if the F.B.I. isn’t following obvious forensic trails, that itself is food for thought and something a cadre of independent forensic experts and citizen journalists will likely be free to pursue with justified vigor.

[brownsfan]

Don’t forget, the ability to compose strongly worded letters.

[rktman]

Meanwhile in meritless garlands office....😴😴😴😴😴

[GMMC0987]

The Feds were however, very quick to spoil the crime scene.

[LachlanMinnesota]

There is also a video of what a human head would look like if struck by the SS sniper from the claimed distance, and it looks nothing like the alleged photos of shooter previously on the internet. The damage is catastrophic, yet the shooter’s head is in tact, placing into question the direction from which he was shot, the weapon used, and the LEO who pulled the trigger, and the location of origin.

[z3n]

#WarrenReport.
Well I don’t really know how much you can trust Oliver Stone to be factual and objective, but if you’ve ever watched “JFK Revisited” (Not “JFK” the Kevin Costner staring semi-factual movie), you might be shocked by rigged the Warren commission was.

It’s the kind of thing you wouldn’t be surprised by these days, but back then, I think most people had a naive trust in government.

[cgbg]

Cheatle made a hilarious unforced error.

When asked whether the assassination was a conspiracy she said it absolutely was not.

The problem is that the investigation has just started and she blurted out the conclusion already.

This is a “tell” of a conspiracy.

[z3n]

This is a “tell” of a conspiracy.

~~~

At least a coverup. But then again, a coverup is a conspiracy in itself.

Because you are right, all they basically say is obstructionist stuff like “I will have to get back to you about that” and “an investigation in ongoing”. So why would she answer No to the question of a conspiracy?

[GeorgiaDawg32]

And if that doesn’t work, a sternly worded letter is next on the agenda..

[Highest Authority]

There is probably a manual on how to disrupt and clean the crime scene ever since the book depository, waco, and the merrett building.

[bitt]

p

[nopardons]

BTTT

[central_va]

“They” ( and you know who they are ) will blatantly cover up the crime and tell you there is nothing to see here, move along.

[The_Media_never_lie]

Don’t forget, the ability to compose strongly worded letters.

________________

This is what our elite government overlords fear most! /s

[RummyChick]

Watch Eli Crane, a former navy seal sniper, ask questions.

https://x.com/wlctv_ca/status/1815856105417032061

See how many questions it raises for you. Watch Col Paris carefully during the questions.

[cgbg]

Yup—it was actually a softball question.

The obvious correct answer is “We are currently investigating all aspects of the assassination attempt. It is far too early to draw any conclusions.”

[uranium penguin]

When Trump takes office...
He really should declassify just about everything.

It will discredit a lot of FBI/ CIA and hit the US in the short term.

But, it would allow him to do a massive house cleaning and readjustments of these agencies.

[Soul of the South]

“There is probably a manual on how to disrupt and clean the crime scene ever since the book depository, waco, and the merrett building.”

Such has hosing down the rooftop of the building where Crooks was located within hours.

[laconic]

Go on to Youtube and type in “Donald Sutherland JFK”. There is a five minute segment on the JFK murder in which Sutherland plays Col. Fletcher Prouty talking to DA Jim Garrison and explaining the key points of Dallas 1963. Most of it is verifiable.