Posted on 07/18/2024 1:31:31 PM PDT by Zhang Fei
Would-be Donald Trump assassin Thomas Matthew Crooks purportedly wrote a chilling online message that hinted at his sinister plans for the day he shot up the former president’s Butler, Pa. rally over the weekend.
“July 13 will be my premiere, watch as it unfolds,” the 20-year-old gunman allegedly wrote on Steam, a popular online platform where gamers communicate, Fox News reported. Investigators are currently working to determine whether the posting is legitimate.
The foreshadowing was revealed to US senators during a briefing by top law enforcement officials Wednesday.
(Excerpt) Read more at nypost.com ...
"Purportedly" is the clever new term for idiots wanting read time for their bullshit articles........
And it's also bait for the idiots who want to jump in and pretend they're lawyers........LOL!
Watch the new documentaries of JFK shooting with new information out that was held for over 60 years.
JFK was going to end the CIA, Bobby was going after Mafia. So much information, witness testimonies, was left out of the warren commission.
I do believe it was a hit job by you know who.
“ They were just up against a smart kid”
That’s why worked at some old folks place place feeding them
There’s been news about how the kid was too bad a shot to be admitted to the school rifle team.
= = =
This sounds really bogus.
Kids may start off a rest, at 50 feet. hard to miss a 5”x7” paper at that distance.
Then prone with sling. Again hard to miss paper. Bullseye is about an inch dia. Usually they quickly get groups of 1/2 inch, then improve.
Unless he is flailing his rifle around, spraying and praying, with teammates diving for cover.
And LBJ and his wife were on the receiving end of that!! EVIL PEOPLE!
The 10’ step ladder belonged to the police.
Crooks’ 5’ ladder was atop the a/c unit on the next building over.
There’s a clear photo of both in place floating around.
Your premier and your swan song. You forgot that man proposes but God disposes.
I was under the impression he had no online profile. FBI claimed there was nothing on his phone. He allegedly had two phones. No confirmation on that. Now we’re supposed to believe this?
Ditto. He allegedly had no online profile either. Now this pops up? No thanks.
Unless he was set up.
There are plenty of really smart people who are underachievers and/or socially backward.
Online account thought to belong to Trump shooter was fake, source says
Another posted article made the same claim earlier.
But, Crooks must have had an online account. It just hasn't been found, yet.
Planned...intentional...blown. The coverup is in full swing.
[“ They were just up against a smart kid”
That’s why worked at some old folks place place feeding them]
https://www.cbsnews.com/news/trump-rally-gunman-identified/
How much training did he did to feed peas to senile people?
It’s likely they scrubbed his stuff early if he had any online presence
I want the “registered Republican” nonsense upended.
Repeated more times than Bill Clinton’s trips to Epstein’s Lolita Island.
In the interest of harmony however I would accept “Crooks was an avid supporter of Liz Cheney.” Maybe.
Cop experts can usually match word usage, syntax and so on to past letters and school papers. Also references only to himself versus fakes showing concern for others and so on. Books about Zodiac and others discuss this.
I would think that the new AI would be even more expert than that.
[How much training did he did to feed peas to senile people?]
The thing about some smart people is that they are socially awkward, some in the extreme. But in carrying out what interests them, they are fearless, focused and relentless.
Note that all Crooks had to do was stay alive for the minute or so he shouldered the rifle. Until then, he was just a kid looking at the rally with a pair of binoculars, belatedly identified as a rangefinder - something common in exurbs like Butler, along with pocket knives and Gerber multitools.
Plenty of literal dictators have been killed in more controlled settings. Rich Hanania, who counts JD Vance as a friend, has an essay on how political assassinations used to be more common.
https://www.richardhanania.com/p/why-are-there-so-few-assassinations
Most of the ones who succeeded or came within striking distance had one thing in common - they were prepared to die trying.
He was so smart even the spectators had his number crawling along llke a rat and he would have been shot dead if competent security had been in charge
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.