Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

How U.S. responses to public health emergencies could be hamstrung by the Supreme Court
StatNews ^ | June 28, 2024 | John Wilkerson

Posted on 06/28/2024 9:21:50 PM PDT by ProgressingAmerica

WASHINGTON — The U.S. response to the Covid-19 pandemic got politically messy. A Friday Supreme Court ruling could frustrate government responses to public health emergencies even further.

The Supreme Court struck down a long-standing legal doctrine that directed judges to defer to reasonable federal agency interpretations of ambiguous or technically challenging aspects of the law. The loss of the so-called Chevron doctrine calls into question every federal agency’s interpretation of a statute, so the ruling affects the regulations of all federal agencies.

...

There were other cases in which Chevron didn’t come up but that involved agencies making legal justification for rules that were very broad, she said. Those include mask requirements for travel, vaccinate-or-test requirements for large employers, and an eviction moratorium. Most of those were struck down even with the Chevron doctrine in place.

“Without Chevron, agencies may be wary of acting, even during an emergency, because their actions could be challenged, and they would no longer be able to cite Chevron in defense of their policy choices,” White said.

(Excerpt) Read more at statnews.com ...


TOPICS: Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: chevron; chevrondoctrine; covid; fascism; johnwilkerson; mandate; scotus; supremecourt; tyranny
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-23 next last

1 posted on 06/28/2024 9:21:50 PM PDT by ProgressingAmerica
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: All

Good, they need some hamstringing.


2 posted on 06/28/2024 9:30:40 PM PDT by BipolarBob (My shrink says I have a sort of road disease. He called me a cycle path.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ProgressingAmerica

The answer? Like democrats say, “my body, my choice. “

This guy’s argument is just a back door excuse for egregious government overstep without benefit of actual specific codified statute. You want government mandate vaccines so bad? Then make Congress codify it. No sale. Chevron was rightfully axed.


3 posted on 06/28/2024 9:31:44 PM PDT by Gaffer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ProgressingAmerica

And the government worshipping slime oozes out from under their rocks to lie to the public about the Chevron deference for example

“ legal doctrine that directed judges to defer to reasonable federal agency interpretations”

there was nothing in the doctrine about reasonable interpretation it was defer to EVERY interpretation y agencies


4 posted on 06/28/2024 9:33:09 PM PDT by from occupied ga (Your government is your most dangerous enemy - EVs a solution for which there is no problem)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ProgressingAmerica

Sounds like someone is Big Mad that they won’t be able to just lock us in our homes and stick us full of poisoned voodoo needles.


5 posted on 06/28/2024 9:40:07 PM PDT by ponygirl (Stay gold.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ProgressingAmerica

Let them think twice about tyrranizing the public with half baked theories.

CC


6 posted on 06/28/2024 9:42:17 PM PDT by Celtic Conservative (My cats are more amusing than 200 channels worth of TV.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ponygirl

“Sounds like someone is Big Mad that they won’t be able to just lock us in our homes and stick us full of poisoned voodoo needles.”

Preceded by unleashing a super bug that Fauci and the Chinese create to kill millions in the U.S. this time.
I don’t put anything past these devils.


7 posted on 06/28/2024 9:47:39 PM PDT by Deo volente ("When we see the image of a baby in the womb, we glimpse the majesty of God's creation." Pres. Trump)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: BipolarBob

If the statutes are ambiguous, Congress can write them more clearly. And if Congress can’t come to an agreement on unambiguous language, Congress can simply do nothing.

When it comes to government, doing nothing is almost always the right thing to do.


8 posted on 06/28/2024 9:53:01 PM PDT by jdege
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: jdege

“The government which governs least governs best”.


9 posted on 06/28/2024 9:54:58 PM PDT by lightman (I am a binary Trinitarian. Deal with it!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: ProgressingAmerica

They mean public health emergencies created by the Chi-coms, and deliberately released on the world. Thanks, but I survived the last manufactured one not doing a damn thing different than I’ve been doing all along.


10 posted on 06/28/2024 9:57:01 PM PDT by mass55th (“Courage is being scared to death, but saddling up anyway.” ― John Wayne)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BipolarBob

The fascist SOB’s need some stringing alright.


11 posted on 06/28/2024 10:02:13 PM PDT by LastDayz (A blunt and brazen Texan. I will not be assimilated.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: ProgressingAmerica

During the Covid outbreak in 2020, the CDC cited the 1944 Public Health Services Act, (amended many times since) giving them very general powers “to prevent the introduction, transmission and spread of communicable diseases from foreign countries into the United States” - in their outrageous action to stop landlords from collecting rents from tenants (later unconstitutionally extended by Biden) for nearly 18 months

Where the hell did the Public Health Services Act say the CDC (which didn’t even exist at the time) have the right to intervene in contracts between landlords and tenants on private property?


12 posted on 06/28/2024 10:16:33 PM PDT by PGR88
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ProgressingAmerica

Good.


13 posted on 06/29/2024 12:00:16 AM PDT by ilgipper (The mob only destroys. Never creates. )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ProgressingAmerica

There are 50,000 Fauci like petty tyrant bureaucrats in the federal agencies that need to be pulled out like ticks. Overturning Chevron is a good start.


14 posted on 06/29/2024 12:01:33 AM PDT by DeplorablePaul
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ProgressingAmerica

BULLSQUEEZE


15 posted on 06/29/2024 1:43:23 AM PDT by Organic Panic (Democrats. Memories as short as Joe Biden's eyes)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ProgressingAmerica
Only a fascist would describe overturning the Chevron "doctrine" as a loss.
16 posted on 06/29/2024 2:05:46 AM PDT by Chad C. Mulligan (Your insults are my rocket fuel. Thank you!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ProgressingAmerica

The chevron dictate was a thief in the nite to our liberty. Good it is gone.


17 posted on 06/29/2024 2:19:09 AM PDT by exnavy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ProgressingAmerica

Good. Many pronouncements by “experts” were crap or kneejerk guesswork.


18 posted on 06/29/2024 2:27:18 AM PDT by Sgt_Schultze (When your business model depends on slave labor, you're always going to need more slaves.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sgt_Schultze

Many were worse than random crap. They were deliberately unconstitutional actions to further leftist agendas


19 posted on 06/29/2024 3:22:14 AM PDT by from occupied ga (Your government is your most dangerous enemy - EVs a solution for which there is no problem)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: ProgressingAmerica

Don’t fall for the author’s focus on disease. It is about control.

Plans to call climate change or guns a health emergency have now been quenched a little. It would take congressional action and a president’s signature to happen. Little Fauci wannabes can’t bully around the US populous as easily anymore.

EC


20 posted on 06/29/2024 3:33:28 AM PDT by Ex-Con777
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-23 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson