Posted on 06/19/2024 9:43:56 AM PDT by Red Badger
The Tenth Circuit Court of Appeals has rejected a lawsuit filed by six members of a Wyoming sorority challenging the admission of a 6’2″, 260-pound trans-identified male, who the women have alleged has “watched” them undress with a visible erection. The University of Wyoming’s chapter of Kappa Kappa Gamma (KKG), the complainants argued, caused the women “emotional distress in a personalized and unique way” and circumvented voting bylaws in their 2022 decision to admit Dallin ‘Artemis’ Langford as a member of the sorority.
The six women were appealing an August 2023 ruling from Judge Alan Johnson that declined their initial litigation on the basis that re-defining “woman” to include males was “Kappa Kappa Gamma’s bedrock right as a private, voluntary organization — and one this Court may not invade.” Judge Johnson dismissed the case without prejudice, but suggested the lawsuit could be refiled.
Two months prior, the sorority had filed a motion to dismiss the suit, calling it a “frivolous” attempt to eject Langford for “their own political purposes.” According to the motion, the women suing had been flinging “dehumanizing mud” in order to “bully Ms. Langford on the national stage.”
Despite the indication from Judge Johnson in his dismissal that the complaint could be refiled, the sorority members’ latest appeal was dismissed on June 12 by a panel of judges on the grounds that the court lacked jurisdiction “due to the absence of a final order by the district court.”
Attorney May Mailman, representing the six sorority members, said in a statement that she disagreed that the court lacked the jurisdiction to hear the case, adding: “Women deserve the camaraderie and safety of sororities, but unfortunately, it also appears they first need courts brave enough to say so.”
Mailman has made the argument that the national sorority council and president Mary Pat Rooney violated KKG’s bylaws, which state that “a new member shall be a woman,” when they accepted Langford.
Other bylaws previously alleged to have been disregarded to secure Langford’s admission included dropping the requirement for a two-thirds majority approval vote via a convention of board members. This came in 2021 after KKG published a Guide For Supporting Our LGBTQIA+ Members which inserted a position statement that “Kappa Kappa Gamma is a single-gender organization comprised of women and individuals who identify as women.” As a Convention to approve this position statement was never held, the appeal stated, Langford’s acceptance into KKG was a violation of accepted policies.
Additionally, the initial complaint filed in March 2023 pointed out that Langford was accepted in KKG with a Grade Point Average (GPA) far below the admission requirement. The sorority’s policy was to only admit students whose GPA was 2.7 or higher, while Langford’s GPA was just 1.9. This indicated that Langford was “evaluated using a different standard” than female members were.
Legal representative for KKG, Natalie McLaughlin, last month argued that “the term ‘women’ is undefined in Kappa’s bylaws,” thereby insinuating that the lack of a definition of ‘woman’ as a female would have been needed for the sorority members to have a case. When defending its decision, KKG has insisted the word ‘woman’ is “unquestionably open to many interpretations.” Leadership for the sorority says the word ‘woman’ has evolved since the founding of the female-only organization 150 years ago.
The 2023 filing emphasizes that women who felt uncomfortable with Langford’s presence within the female-only sorority house were told: “since [Langford] identifies as a woman, you have no reason to feel uncomfortable,” and that such sentiments “do not subscribe to Kappa’s values of inclusion and diversity.”
Another issue presented within the legal challenge to Langford’s membership involved alleged harassment of the young women on the part of KKG. The lawsuit had alleged that sorority leaders had used “coercive” tactics during the process of voting on his application.
Although Langford required a majority vote to gain admission to KKG, the initial litigation points out that the female members were at first promised anonymity in the voting process, only to then be told they would have to identify themselves on the ballot form.
Last year, one sorority member came forward to state that despite being told their votes would be confidential, the women were suddenly required to expose their names on the online form. This resulted in women feeling “intimidated” with voicing their concerns about a male entering the sorority.
In a meeting held to discuss Langford’s potential candidacy, KKG chapter leaders, including the president and membership chair, allegedly dismissed the concerns of women who expressed discomfort.
“Regardless of what your political views are, our Kappa values are acceptance and kindness so if that is something that you disagree with, that’s not in line with Kappa values,” one member allegedly said at the time, according to the unnamed KKG member.
Another member allegedly said “If you vote no, it better be for issues with that new member or else it’s homophobic.”
Following the launch of their lawsuit, the women involved were similarly denied anonymity by the court, even as Langford’s identity was anonymized under the pseudonym “Terry Smith.”
As previously reported by Reduxx, the female KKG members involved in the lawsuit noted that there had been several disturbing instances of inappropriate behavior from Langford following his admission.
Court records revealed that the young women alleged Langford, who is 6’2″, had been voyeuristically peeping on them while they were in intimate situations, and, on at least one occasion, had a visible erection while doing so.
“One sorority member walked down the hall to take a shower, wearing only a towel … She felt an unsettling presence, turned, and saw [Langford] watching her silently,” one court document, which had anonymized Langford, reads.
“[Langford] has, while watching members enter the sorority house, had an erection visible through his leggings,” the suit says. “Other times, he has had a pillow in his lap.”
The initial complaint adds that Langford is “sexually interested in women” as evidenced by his Tinder profile “through which he seeks to meet women.” It is further alleged that Langford took photographs of the women while at a sorority slumber party, where he also is said to have made inappropriate comments.
“Smith repeatedly questioned the women about what vaginas look like, breast cup size, whether women were considering breast reductions and birth control,” the complaint alleges.
Last November, two veteran members of KKG were expelled after expressing disapproval towards the admission of Langford. Patsy Levang and Cheryl Tuck-Smith had been alumni members of the sorority for over 50 years, but were removed in apparent retaliation for advocating that membership be restricted to females only.
The women’s removal came after they vocally opposed to the admission of the trans-identified male to the KKG chapter at the University of Wyoming. Levang and Tuck-Smith had also supported the lawsuit launched by members of the sorority to have Langford removed.
Despite their long history of supporting KKG, Levang and Tuck-Smith were voted out by the sorority’s national leadership on November 9. Levang had been the past Kappa Kappa Gamma National Foundation President, while Tuck-Smith was an active contributor and organizer.
Langford, who began identifying as a “lesbian” in 2017, has received sympathetic coverage in US mainstream media, with one MSNBC host labeling him “brave and unique.” In a profile by the Washington Post published last year, Langford was given a platform to accuse the sorority sisters involved in the suit of lying while he was compared to women who had historically been denied the right to a basic education.
Reduxx was the first to reveal that Langford’s given name is Dallin, and that he declared a transgender identity while participating in mock micro-nations in high school.
According to a micro-nations wiki entry: “On the 11th of June 2017, Dallin Langford announced to the micro-national community that she was transgender and was given a name change to Artemis Langford as reflection of this revelation. The Kingdom changed into a Queendom and from King to Queen.”
There’s other ways.
Do it anyway.
Sounds like the court is correct and the Sorority is the problem. These real girls just need to find a new sorority that appreciates women.
Disband the chapter, then re-form it.
They should all quit the sorority and let it live there by itself.
In sum, the children voted to allow the tranny-dude into their sorority, because of "peer pressure."
Sadly, these girls will become adult karens, and vote for people like Kamala Harris because "hope and change" or something.
>> The Tenth Circuit Court of Appeals has rejected a lawsuit... challenging the admission of a 6’2″, 260-pound [mentally ill he-she]
Refresh my memory, is the Tenth Circuit one of those that was shifted from conservative to progressive by Jobama-cabal judicial picks (that the senate RINOs allowed to move forward)?
The war on women continues.
This kind of situation is totally unacceptable.
>> There’s other ways.
It’s Wyoming. I’m sure they are well-supplied with the “hardware” to deal with the problem once and for all.
How’s that libtardism working out for you college kids?
I went to college, but not a university, and I still don’t know very much about how sororities or fraternities are run.
That said, couldn’t a “new” sorority be formed on that campus, one with different By Laws and dictates?
Or do most universities only permit ONE sorority and ONE fraternity per campus, per semester year?
The girls are not going to change these brainwashed, fanatics now controlling such on campus organizations.
Besides, shouldn’t this GUY be getting close to graduation anyway? Maybe he’ll simply age out of the entire caper.
“There’s other ways.”
Yes, more traditional and historic. A good, earnest talking to; should be easy to set this man’s mind right.
Which of these doesn’t look like the others. 😆
They will have to move.
Charge him an exhorbitant amount of rent.
Yep. Better call Saul.
I don’t know either.................
If you’re gay, you don’t “identify” as gay. You’re just gay. Same with lesbian or any other feature of human existence. You don’t for example identify as a musical genius. You are, or you aren’t. Only if you’re pretending to be something you are not must you “identify” as that thing. And, you have to tell people so they can be part of your fantasy. The problem is, if you don’t want to be part of someone’s fantasy, then YOU are the bad guy. It’s insane. And because it makes no sense, I suspect it will be a short-lived fashion statement. Like Nahur jackets and bellbottoms, in a few years people will look at the photos and think, “oh, how gross.”
I was criticized by an Uber-liberal for bringing my 1952 straight eight Pontiac to a Mustang club meeting. I said, “It self-identifies as a Mustang.” He just stood there looking at me while everyone burst out laughing. As far as I’m concerned, the whole “self-Identity” trend is just that silly.
Best of all, the Greek system is highly networked so most frats and sororities are following this and hopefully will learn an object lesson about DEI culture and tranny relations.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.